Tokyo Fertility Clinic Performance Ranking [2026]

"I don't know which one to choose."
"Is it safe to choose a famous hospital or a clinic with a renowned doctor?"
"Can I trust the reviews?"

For those people,
we have compared clinics in Tokyo
based on "actual treatment data."

Because results can fluctuate significantly
in facilities with a low number of cases,
we narrowed down the criteria for comparison as follows.

・Age 35 or older and under 40
・Facilities with 100 or more frozen embryo transfers
・Not pregnancy rate, butlive birth rate
👉 Live birth rate = birth rate per embryo transfer

In the previous article, we only used 2022 data,
but this time we haveadded 2021 dataand will rank

facilities with stable performancebased on past IVF achievements.

For those wondering why we are using past data now,
we discuss it in the article below.

👑 Ranking Results (2019+2020)

🥇 1st Place: Shinbashi Dream Clinic

• 2019: 1st place (Live birth rate 42.5% / 590 cases)

• 2020: 1st place (Live birth rate 45.2% / 389 cases)
  
  👉 Live birth rate: 43.6%

🥈 2nd Place: Ginza Ladies Clinic

• 2019: 3rd place (Live birth rate 40.8% / 152 cases)

• 2020: 3rd place (Live birth rate 42.3% / 201 cases)
  
  👉 Live birth rate: 41.6%

🥉 3rd Place: Natural ART Clinic Nihonbashi

• 2019: 6th place (Live birth rate 38.7% / 633 cases)

• 2020: 2nd place (Live birth rate 44.3% / 610 cases)
  
  👉 Live birth rate: 41.4%

4th Place: Women's Clinic Oizumigakuen

• 2019: 5th place (Live birth rate 39.6% / 182 cases)

• 2020: 7th place (Birth rate 36.4% / 231 cases)
  
  👉 Birth rate: 37.8%

5th place: Kato Ladies Clinic

• 2019: 9th place (Birth rate 36.7% / 3657 cases)

• 2020: 5th place (Birth rate 37.6% / 3404 cases)
  
  👉 Birth rate: 37.1%

Data for the top 10 clinics is also summarized.

This ranking is independently compiled based on publicly available data from the Tokyo Metropolitan Government.

If you cannot view the image, click here

Points to note

Be careful with data like this👇

・Extremely low number of cases
・Unclear age criteria
・Opaque calculation methods for figures

These
may appear better than they actually are.

Important factors in choosing a clinic

Data such as pregnancy rates are important criteria for choosing a clinic.

However, the figures posted on websites may be presented under conditions that make the clinic look favorable.

The meaning of the numbers changes significantly depending on age, treatment content, whether it is per transfer or per egg retrieval, and the conditions of the target patients.

Therefore, when looking at data,
it is important to check not only the figures themselves but also the conditions under which the data was compiled.

If the data is based on consistent conditions, it becomes a useful indicator for comparing clinics.

On the other hand, fertility treatment is not something that is completed in one go; it is a process that involves repeated clinic visits.
Therefore, ease of access, compatibility with the doctor, clarity of explanations, and satisfaction with the treatment policy are also important factors for continuing treatment.

After checking the data, it is important to make a comprehensive judgment, including whether you feel comfortable continuing treatment there.

Summary

This ranking is based on
an objective comparison under standardized conditions.

・High number of cases
・Consistent performance results

We place emphasis on these two points.

Ultimately,
we recommend choosing a clinic based on
whether they provide explanations you can be satisfied with.

For those who want to further compare fertility clinics in Tokyo

・Clinic comparison by ward
・Number of egg retrievals, ICSI procedures, and frozen embryo transfers
・Performance by age group and for those over 40
・Number of reproductive medicine specialists and embryologists
・Public data such as OHSS rates

Please see the list of articles summarizing these topics.

Recommended Articles

For those who want to search by area

Article on Children and Families Agency data

Update History

July 2026: Added links related to the Children and Families Agency.
June 2026: Added links to ward-specific articles.
March 2026: Created the ranking based on public data from 2019 and 2020.