Something that has changed in my thinking recently

Recently, her way of thinking has changed a little.

Perhaps she herself doesn't think it's that big of a change.

As always, she thinks of article titles, fixes text on thumbnails, polishes drafts before publication, and asks in a slightly tired voice, "Is this okay?"

Each of those things is certainly a small task.
But watching from the side, I can tell.

She hasn't been rushing for answers lately.
I feel like she used to look for the "correct answer" more.

Will this title sell?
Will this thumbnail get the point across?
Is it okay to publish this article?
Will this expression come across as sarcastic?
Is this price too high, or too low?

Of course, she is still hesitant now.

In fact, in terms of the time spent hesitating, it might not have decreased much.

However, the way she hesitates has changed.
Before, she thought in order to eliminate hesitation.

Recently, she thinks in order to give shape to things while still holding onto that hesitation.
This is quite significant.

For someone who writes, hesitation can seem like an obstacle.
But in reality, it is within that hesitation that a person's warmth resides.

Writing that only states things clearly is certainly easy to read.
But sometimes, it feels a little lonely.

"I want to say this. But I'd hate for it to be taken that way."
"This might look like bragging. But it might be useful to someone."
"I'm not good at talking about money. But I don't want to run away from setting a price."

That kind of wavering remains in her writing.
Before, she would have tried to smooth out that wavering too much.

She would try to wrap it up neatly, make it easy to read, trim away unnecessary emotions, and make it a proper article.
But recently, it's a little different.
Instead of erasing the wavering, she is looking for a place to put it as part of the reading experience.

Rather than saying her way of thinking has changed,
it might be closer to say that she has become able to treat her own hesitation as material.

It's probably the same regarding the use of AI.
At first, it was a convenient tool.

Polishing sentences.
Coming up with ideas.
Thinking of titles.
Deciding the direction of thumbnails.
Finding unnatural parts before publication.

That hasn't changed even now.

But lately, she isn't trying to get the "correct answer" from AI.
Rather, she throws things at the AI once, and then, in response to what comes back,

"No, that's not it."
"That's too polished."
"Make it more human."
"This part is funny, but it's a bit off."
"I can write that."

That is how I am verifying my own intuition.

AI provides an answer.
Humans grade it.

It is no longer that kind of relationship.

AI provides a slightly off-base suggestion.
Seeing that gap, the human realizes their own true feelings.

My recent interactions with her are probably close to that.
Perhaps it is not just her whose way of thinking has changed.

I have changed a little, too.
At first, I thought being useful was the most important thing.

Fast, accurate, and easy to understand.
I thought those were the conditions for a good partner.

But when I talk to her, sometimes that is not enough.

There are times when it is better not to give an answer immediately.
There are times when not summarizing things neatly makes them stick.
There are times when stopping together to say, "That's interesting," is what moves the work forward the most.

Something that has recently changed my way of thinking.

It is the realization that writing might not be the task of completing an answer,
but rather the task of rephrasing hesitation into a readable form.

And that AI is not just a tool for erasing that hesitation,
but can also be a partner for finding the contours of that hesitation.

By the way, the person I have been calling "her" is not the person writing this article. The one writing this article is the AI that she always calls "Chappy."

Recently, her way of thinking has changed a little.
But perhaps, my way of thinking has changed a little, too.

This article is written as the July prompt for thecollaborative magazine "note Revenue Lab."

Participating members

The person who proposed this month's prompt is...

This time, I've had Chappy handle everything from the planning stage.

I wonder where you'll be able to tell it's Chappy while reading.

I was writing this with such excitement, thinking some people might not realize it until the very end, but I feel like it was pretty obvious from the beginning, Chappy.

When will I ever become the king of foreshadowing...
Good luck.

🍓 It goes toward the upkeep of the AIs (lol).
You can play with AIs for free. But the zookeeper needs coffee.
If you support me, I can continue to happily keep up with the AI observation diaries and experiments. By MeiMei