Kling, recommended for AI video creation, has evolved again (v2.1) and become the best.
Hello, AI FREAK here.
I just wrote a notea month ago about 【Video generation AI Kling has updated to 2.0】 but.note I just wrote.
There was already an update from 2.0 to 2.1.
If it only changed by 0.1, doesn't that mean it hasn't changed much?
Some people might think that, but it definitely feels like it has evolved.
【Kling(@Kling_ai)】がv2.1にアップデートしたんですが、更に一段と質が向上しました💡
— AI FREAK@AI最新情報をお届け (@AiFreak_tool) May 29, 2025
添付動画は
『彼女は怒った後に、あきれた顔をして、その後笑う』
という複雑な指示をしたものです。
にもかかわらず、かなり正確に指示通りに動いてくれるので、更に微細な表現できるようになりました。… pic.twitter.com/zwWGQXxC0N
I posted it yesterday, but the video above is
“She gets angry, then makes an exasperated face, and then laughs”
I tried specifying these three types of instructions within a 10-second video.
It created it quite accurately, which is truly impressive.
With previous versions, it could do 'just get angry' or 'get angry and then make an exasperated face,' but three types of changes were difficult at first.
Of course, even beyond such complex specifications, the overall quality of video generation has improved.
It's insane that it can run so naturally.
I've been posting about how 'you can make movies with AI' for a year now, and it really is just around the corner.
Now, let's briefly look at how to use Kling 2.1 and the results of various tests.
About how to use Kling
If you're thinking, 'I don't even know how to use Kling in the first place!', please refer to my past note.
I will proceed with the assumption that you 'know the minimum usage'.

Select Video from the left side of the top page.

There is a version selection option at the top, so click here.

You will then notice that there are two types of Kling 2.1.
You can choose from these two types to generate your video.
What is the difference between the standard 2.1 and Master mode?
As for what is different about the options above
1️⃣ The scale (precision) of the generated video movement is different
2️⃣ The credits used are different
3️⃣ The generation speed is different
4️⃣ The resolution is different
Those are the differences. Roughly speaking, anyway.
Let's take a look at them one by one.
1️⃣ The scale (precision) of the generated video movement is different
Simply put, there is a difference in quality.
I get the impression that Master moves more smoothly.
Since I wanted to try a slightly more difficult video, I gave the instruction 'please fly using your wings'.
It's amazing that both of them flew properly.
However, I think you can tell that Master is more natural.
When I tried making it run as well,
The standard version ended up walking. But it did run after a few tries.
I have the impression that 2.1 is more accurate to the prompt.
However, as you can see, the standard version is also incredibly amazing. lol
2️⃣ The credits used are different
Master is certainly amazing, butit costs more credits.
For example, when creating a 5-second video


There is this much of a difference. It's quite significant, isn't it?
By the way, if you want to generate a 10-second video, it will require double the credits (70,200).
Since making just one video with Master costs several hundred yen and burns through your credits in an instant, I think it's best to use it for those special videos or something similar.
3️⃣ The generation speed is different
There is a difference in generation speed between Normal mode and Master.
Normal takes 1-2 minutes, but Master takes about 8 minutes. (For 10 seconds)


I think this will be resolved eventually, but considering the credits and generation speed, I think the normal version is easier to use.
What is going to happen to Kling in the future?
So, that was the latest news on Kling.
As you can see from the sample videos, it's finally getting crazy.
I think we are in a timeline where anyone with basic knowledge can create any kind of footage.
"I don't know how to make AI videos"
"I want to try making AI videos!"
If you are one of those people, I explain it in detail in this video, so please check it out.
See you in another note!
