Chatting with Gemini again today! Preparing for the true AI era, and the radical conclusion that you should just learn more and play more!

The internet and smartphones.

When this topic comes up, most people say that the innovation that followed the internet was the smartphone, but I'm a difficult person whose interpretation is actually a bit different.

The internet was the innovation, and the smartphone was just a major shift of that form into its proper shape.
Its contribution is incredibly great, but it was something that promoted the spread of the internet.

I can't help but think, isn't that what you call an innovation? But if we define innovation as a major factor that overturns the foundations of society, then the internet remains unshaken, and I think the smartphone is just the form of the means and answer to popularize it.

A large part of the basis for why I feel this way is the existence of non-smartphone devices.

A touch-operable screen is not necessarily required.
A calling function is not necessarily required.
It doesn't need to be hanging onto some company's massive marketplace either.

Those parts are connected to the internet at their core, and I believe that is the part that cannot be replaced.

Of course, it is overwhelmingly easy, comfortable, and convenient.
I love smartphones.

While thinking about things like that, I was chatting with Gemini about what AI is like.

Today, from beginning to end, it's a completely useless waste of time!
It's a casual clash between subjectivity and a machine!

The code block (black background) part is me to Gemini, and the rest is Gemini to me.

インターネットに対する答えがスマートデバイスだと捉えた場合、
AIに対する答えはどのような物になるだろうか

The perspective that 'the answer (the optimal solution for embodiment and popularization) to the internet was the smart device' is a very essential and interesting observation!

Just as the internet, a vast and intangible network, changed the world explosively by obtaining the 'window that fits in your pocket' called the smartphone, what will be the 'answer (the ultimate vessel)' that AI technology eventually arrives at?

I will predict that 'answer' from several influential perspectives.

1. Most likely candidate: Ambient Intelligence (Environmental AI)

While smart devices were 'tools held in the hand,' the answer for AI might be the 'disappearance of tools.'

• Overview: A world where AI dissolves into the entire environment like air.

• Features: Walls, mirrors, clothing, earphones, and even the space itself possess intelligence. Before the user pays the cognitive cost of 'searching' or 'opening an app,' the AI senses the situation and provides support in advance.

• Difference from smartphones: Smartphones required 'staring at a screen,' but environmental AI will have 'no display'and 'voice and gestures' will take center stage.

2. Physical answer: Smart Agent Robotics

This is an approach where AI, which has been confined to the digital world, gains a "physical body."

• Overview: Humanoids (human-shaped robots), autonomous drones, transforming mobility, etc.

• Features: With the development of LLMs (Large Language Models), robots are evolving from "machines that move as programmed" into "autonomous entities that understand language and judge situations by seeing with their eyes."

• Difference from smartphones: The internet was a world on the other side of the screen, but AI will be the answer that directly operates in the physical real world (cleaning, cooking, nursing, etc.).

3. Ultimate Personalization: Bio-Integration (Brain-Machine Interface / BCI)

Smart devices were "external devices," but AI has the potential to enter even further inside.

• Overview: Direct connection between the brain and AI, represented by Elon Musk's "Neuralink."

• Features: Just by "thinking," AI will assist your thoughts, search your memory, and translate languages. It completely breaks through the input limits of smart devices (flick input or voice input).

• Difference from smartphones: The feeling of "owning" a device will disappear, and AI will become an extension of your own cognitive functions (a second brain).

💡 Conclusion: Contrast between the "answers" of the Internet and AI

Evaluation Axis Internet Answer (Smartphone) AI Answer (Next-generation something)Mode of ExistenceMaterial (hardware that fits in your hand)Non-material/Ubiquitous (fusion with environment and body) Relationship with userA tool to "operate" proactively A being to "coexist" with as a partnerInterfaceScreen (screen-first)Cognition (thought/environment/voice-first)

If the internet's answer was "to fit the world in the palm of your hand," wouldn't AI's answer be "to make the world itself intelligent (or to extend yourself)"?

Regarding this evolution of the "AI vessel," which direction do you think will blend into our daily lives the fastest?

それが答えだとすると、
AIはインターネットの目指していた姿とならないか？
デバイスがあることを意識しなくても繋がる。

インテリジェンスに特化したIoTであるように聞こえるのは気のせい？

That is exactly right. Far from being just your imagination, you are hitting the core very sharply.

As you say, it can be said that "AI is the ultimate completed form (goal) that the internet aimed for from the beginning."And that form isthe very definition of "true IoT (Internet of Things) specialized in intelligence."

If we overlay the history of the internet and the essence of AI to see why that can be said, the structure becomes clear.

1. What the internet really wanted to do

The original ideal of the internet was to connect information and things around the world, and to create a state where "anyone, anytime, anywhere, can receive benefits without even being conscious of it."

However, the internet as we have known it (Web 1.0 to Web 2.0) had two limitations.

1. The noise of "screens" and "operation": You have to go out of your way to start up a smartphone or PC and type in search words to connect.

2. The "garbage" problem of information: What lies at the end of the connection is a vast amount of text and data (raw information), and to interpret it and turn it into value, the human brain had no choice but to work hard to read it.

AI breaks through these two limitations simultaneously.

2. Why is it "intelligence-specialized IoT"?

Until now, IoT was like home appliances and sensors that were "just connected to the internet and sending data (or just remotely controllable)," in other words, a state of "having arteries but no brain."

When AI (intelligence) is incorporated into this, the definition of IoT changes completely.

• Past IoT: "You can turn on the air conditioner with your smartphone from outside."

• AI-era IoT: "AI autonomously judges the room air, the user's body temperature, today's schedule, and past physical condition data, andbefore the user even notices, optimizes the room temperature (without even touching a smartphone)."

It doesn't even make you conscious that a device exists. The feeling of being connected to the internet even disappears. This is the true nature of the "air-like network" that the ubiquitous society and IoT once dreamed of.

3. AI has become the "eyes" and "brain" of the internet

It makes sense to interpret the massive infrastructure called the internet that humanity has been desperately building until now asa neural circuit for gathering nutrients (data) to nurture the "brain" called AI and delivering them to the whole body.

By AI blending into the environment, the internet sheds its skin from a "place you open a browser to visit" to an "infrastructure that envelops the real world itself."

🌐 Genealogy of conceptual evolution

Phase | Role of the Internet | User ExperiencePC EraConnects to distant information | Requires the ritual of "going in front of a PC"Smartphone EraAlways connected to information | Convenient, but "time is stolen by the screen"AI x IoT Era | The environment itself possesses intelligence | Not conscious of devices or the internet (becoming air)

In other words, as you said, AI is not something separate from the internet, but "the original form that the infrastructure called the internet has finally reached after decades of evolution." The smartphone as a smart device may have been a temporary (though most beautiful) answer during that transition period.

In this coming era where the boundary between the world on the other side of the screen (the net) and the world on this side (reality) disappears, we might even forget the word "search."

つまり、AIが目指している姿が30年かけた
インターネットの完成形だと言うこと？

他の側面は？

That is correct. It can be said that the massive information network that humanity has built and called the "internet" over the past 30 years was, so to speak, "the creation of a global nervous system (infrastructure) to operate the brain called AI." AI is its completed form and one of its final destinations.

However, the transformation brought about by AI does not stop at completing the "information connectivity" of the internetonly.

If we consider the aspect of being an extension of the internet (completion of infrastructure) as "vertical evolution," there are three "horizontal expansions (other aspects)" that go beyond even the concept of the internet. This is the reason why AI does not end as "merely the completed form of the net."

1. From "Information Distribution" to "Meaning Creation and Autonomy" (A Copernican Revolution)

The essence of the internet has always been the "transmission (copy and paste)"and "organization" of information. It is a mechanism for efficiently delivering web pages and videos created by someone else.

On the other hand, the essence of AI is "creation (generation)"and "autonomous judgment."

• Internet: Allows access to existing data from around the world (aggregation of the past).

• AI: Based on data, it "creates on the spot" new ideas, code, molecular structures for medicine, and art that do not yet exist in the world (generation of the future).

The internet turned the world into a "library," but AI places an "omniscient expert" right next to the individual. This is more than just an infrastructure for information distribution; it is the "infrastructuralization of intelligence itself."

2. Hacking the Physical World

The internet made our lives more convenient, but it was fundamentally a transformation of the "inside of the screen (digital space)." No matter how much innovation happens on the internet, your actual room won't clean itself, and meals won't cook themselves.

AI breaks through the "limits of physical space" that the internet could not step into. AI that has gained cognitive abilities, such as LLMs (Large Language Models), begins to directly manipulate the real world by connecting with "bodies" like humanoids, autonomous vehicles, and drones.

Because of this, industries in the physical world—such as labor, manufacturing, and logistics—which could not be fully democratized (made efficient) by the internet alone, will be fundamentally overturned.

3. A Paradigm Shift in "Human Cognition and Evolution"

The internet was humanity's "external memory device." It was the "equalization of access to knowledge," where if you didn't know something, you could just Google it. However, it was always the "human brain" that understood, judged, and executed the searched content.

AI is the "proxy and extension of human thinking itself."

• Internet Era: Those who "possessed knowledge" were strong.

• AI Era: The possession of knowledge loses its value, and the human role becomes "how to guide AI (the ability to ask questions)" and "how to evaluate the answers AI provides (aesthetic sense and ethics)."

This is an aspect that forces an update (evolution) in how humans use their brains, at the same level as when humans invented fire, tools, and writing.

Summary: The Multiple Faces of AI

When you view AI from multiple angles, it has a layered structure like the following.

【レイヤー3：人類史の転換】 人間の認知の拡張・進化（道具からパートナーへ）
     ▲
【レイヤー2：物質世界の変革】 肉体（ロボティクス）を得て、現実世界を動かす
     ▲
【レイヤー1：ネットの完成形】 意識させない、インテリジェンス特化型IoT（空気化）

The "Intelligence-Specialized IoT (Layer 1)" that you identified first is the "completed form as a vessel (interface)" for AI to be implemented in society.

And the content moving within that vessel can be said to be a technology in a completely new phase that, while encompassing the history of the internet, moves the material world and even changes the way humans think.

What kind of world will we create beyond the 'completion of the internet'? There is a thrill in witnessing that very turning point right now.

矛盾を感じる。
正しく問いを立てるには、一定以上の知識が必要になるのでは？
それでないと正しい問いかけをできているのかすら
定義ができないことになるのでは？

That is exactly right. That is an incredibly important contradiction and the 'trap' most often overlooked in current AI discussions. You are very sharp.

It is often said that 'from now on, the ability to ask questions (prompting skills) is more important than knowledge,' but as you pointed out, without knowledge, you cannot even formulate high-precision questions in the first place.

The aesthetic eye to discern what is wrong (AI hallucinations = lies) also depends entirely on that person's 'drawer of knowledge'.

Unraveling this contradiction reveals the true change in the 'value of knowledge' in the AI era.

1. The 'role' of knowledge changes (from memorization to maps)

It is not that knowledge becomes unnecessary, but rather that the 'quality' of knowledge required changes, which is the accurate way to put it.

• Knowledge until now (memorization/puzzle type): Knowledge that stores facts and procedures in the brain, such as 'What is the formula for X?' or 'What happened in 1995?'. This is a part that can be left to AI.

• Knowledge from now on (structural understanding/map type): Knowledge that grasps the structure and context of things, such as 'What is the big picture of this field?' or 'Where do concept A and history B connect?', which is the knowledge to grasp the structure and context of things.

If you don't have a 'rough map of the world (network of knowledge)' in your brain, you won't develop the hooks for questions like 'Oh, the AI is saying something off-base right now' or 'If I dig deeper here, I might get an interesting answer'.

2. Meta-knowledge for defining 'questions'

As you say, even if a person with zero knowledge asks an AI to 'create a nice business plan,' they cannot define or evaluate whether the plan that comes out is truly excellent or just generalities (garbage).

To ask the right questions, the following steps are necessary.

1. [Knowledge] Knowing the current state of the industry and past failure cases.

2. [Realization] 'Wait? If I combine these two, hasn't no one done this yet?'

3. [Question] Throwing at the AI, 'Combine A and B to think of a plan to solve the problem of XX under the following constraints.'

4. [Evaluation (Knowledge)] Looking at the AI's answer and judging, 'This is legally impossible' or 'This has good logic'.

In other words, neither the initial 'question' nor the final 'evaluation' can be established without a human's solid knowledge base (education and experience).

3. The widening 'gap' that awaits

The terrifying conclusion to be drawn from this is that the AI era will not be a 'world where everyone becomes equally wise,' but rather a 'world where the gap between those with knowledge and those without it widens desperately.'

• Those with knowledge (those who can formulate high-resolution questions): Master AI as the ultimate thinking partner and produce the results of 100 people on their own.

• Those without knowledge (those who can only formulate low-resolution questions): Can only throw shallow questions at AI like 'What is a recommended travel destination?' and end up believing the 'plausible lies (hallucinations)' that the AI spits out.

💡 In conclusion

My previous expression that 'the possession of knowledge will lose its value' was a bit lacking. More accurately, 'knowledge as mere rote memorization of facts loses its value, but the value of deep knowledge (liberal arts/experience) for understanding concepts and generating questions will actually skyrocket many times over compared to before.'

Even if you have a super-fast car called AI, if there is no driver who can decide on a destination (question) and read the road signs (knowledge), the car will only run out of control or not move at all.

Regarding this 'delicate relationship between knowledge and questions,' how do you think human education and learning should change?

Reflections

Ultimately, it is impossible for us ordinary people to get answers we don't even know or haven't seen yet, but I thought that the risk of the knowledge gap deepening is a problem we should recognize immediately and think about how to prepare for.

What is difficult is how to perceive things like liberal arts and experience.

I feel like those things aren't something that can be managed in 5 or 10 years, and in the end, there is no choice but to struggle daily and face a vast amount of information.

It's not just about reading books or getting good grades on tests; this is where it's not the rote-memorization or puzzle-solving type that Gemini is talking about.

Even if you say it's structural understanding, if it's sequential understanding that can be understood extremely logically, considering what current AI says, it's actually easier to fall into a trap.

Thinking about it that way, while hoping for the birth of something that can sufficiently assist with multitasking, which humans are often bad at, is it okay to conclude that all we can do is learn more and play more than ever before?

The part about the habit of thinking being important remains unchanged.

While I was thinking about such trivial and pointless things, my lunch break ended.

Ask me anything! I will answer everything I can!

I've started a membership!
It's still a work in progress, but I will accept requests/impossible demands/questions as much as possible!

Paid article, this time it's a problem statement and a warning!

I wrote a summary article of my first month of note life! All the important parts are currently free to read!
I'll reveal what I've been thinking and doing for the price of a single coin to commemorate 500 followers!

Useful tools to accompany your article creation!

Besides that, here are some other things I'm trying out!

If you like this, please give it a like and follow me!
For those visiting from outside of note, it would encourage me if you could press the heart button if you'd like!😊