There was a paper about how to write a paper 2
There was a paper about how to write a paper 2
Hello, this is makokon.
I previously wrote an article titled "There was a paper about how to write a paper." I have found another paper, so I would like to introduce it.
The strongest argument in this paper is that there is a recommended "writing order" for completing an efficient and logical paper. Although one naturally wants to write in order from the beginning, it seems thatthe important thing is to write from the facts.
It seems that writing the objectives and abstract later results in a more consistent paper.
https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jsicm/18/1/18_1_49/_pdf/-char/ja
A Textbook on "High-Quality Paper Writing" for Young Researchers
Introduction
Conducting high-quality research and publishing it as a paper in clear prose is one of the greatest joys for a researcher. This textbook systematically explains the basic rules of paper writing, the efficient writing order, and the key points for passing peer review.
Chapter 1: The Big Picture of a Paper and the "Golden Writing Order"
Are you trying to write a paper in order from the beginning (Abstract → Objectives → ... )?
There is a recommended "writing order" for completing an efficient and logical paper.
1.1 Components of a Paper and Writing Order
A paper consists of many parts, but there is an order that is easier to write in, and some parts cannot be written until the data is solidified.
The figure below shows the components of a paper and the recommended writing order.
Explanation
Write from the facts: Since "Methods" and "Results" are based on facts, there are fewer elements to worry about, making it easier to proceed with writing.
Logic later: Although "Objectives" and "Abstract" are the face of the paper, it is easier to achieve consistency if they are written after the overall picture (especially the discussion content) has been finalized.
Chapter 2: [Practice] Solidifying the Facts (Methods, Results, Figures and Tables)
Accuracy that allows readers to replicate the study and visual clarity that allows results to be understood at a glance are required.
2.1 Materials and Methods
Reproducibility: Describe with enough accuracy that other researchers can read it and replicate the study as is.
Consistency: Clarify that the measurements and investigations are in line with the objectives.
Statistics: Clearly state the statistical methods used, software name, version, and significance level.
2.2 Results and Figures & Tables
Figures and tables are the stars: A single refined figure or table is better than a long-winded explanation in text.
Avoid redundancy: Do not repeat the numerical values in the figures and tables directly in the text.
-
Rules for figures and tables:
Table: Provide an appropriate title.
Figure: Provide an appropriate legend.
Independence: Ensure the content can be understood from the figures, tables, and legends alone without reading the main text.
Chapter 3: [Practice] The Soul of a Paper: "Discussion"
The discussion is the most important part that determines the evaluation of a paper, and it is the most difficult part to write.
3.1 Rules for the structure of the discussion
First paragraph: Briefly summarize the most important part of the results.
Development: Interpretation of your own results -> Comparison with existing research -> Logical discussion.
-
Taboos:
Mere repetition of results.
General theories or textbook-style descriptions unrelated to your own data.
Over-speculation: Extrapolating beyond what the data can support.
3.2 Logical Flow Diagram for Discussion
Chapter 4: Finalizing, Submitting, and Peer Review
4.1 Introduction and Abstract
Introduction: It is smoother to write this after the entire paper is finished, as an "introduction that leads to these results and discussion." Include three elements: "background," "problem," and "clear objective (hypothesis)."
Abstract: A miniature version of the entire paper. A structured abstract (Objective, Methods, Results, Conclusion) is common.
4.2 Responding to Peer Review
After submission, you will receive comments from reviewers. This is valuable feedback for polishing your paper.
Attitude: Accept them humbly and respond to every comment one by one.
Revisions: Make corrections for points you agree with, and provide logical counterarguments for those you do not.
Conclusion
Polishing: Before submitting, be sure to have colleagues or supervisors (others) read it. They will find logical leaps or typos you might miss yourself. Be prepared to rewrite it 10 times.
Mindset: A short paper is a good paper. Start writing first.
Hashtags
#PaperWriting #HowToWriteAPaper #Research #Researcher #Paper #AcademicPaper #PaperStructure #PaperDiscussion #PaperAbstract #PaperObjective #ResearchPaper #PaperCreation #AcademicWriting #ResearchLife #PaperPresentation #ResearchResults #PaperTechniques #PaperPolishing #PeerReview #YoungResearcher