When interest rates rise, companies lose time before they lose profit
Rising interest rates and management
When interest rates rise, companies lose time before they lose profit.
Before the impact of rising interest rates clearly appears in financial results, a company's investment capacity and room for judgment begin to shrink.
Funds available for new businesses decrease.
The period a company can wait for loss-making businesses shortens.
The number of months a company can endure when sales payments are delayed decreases.
Strategic options that could have been chosen are no longer available due to a lack of funds.
In other words, what a company loses first is not just accounting profit.
It is the time to defer judgment and the options to correct mistakes.
While interest rates were low, it was easy to buy that time by borrowing funds.
Even if investment recovery was delayed, it could be bridged with the next round of funding.
Even if a new business did not launch as planned, it could wait a little longer.
Even for unprofitable businesses, withdrawal could be postponed if additional financing could be obtained.
However, when interest rates rise, the cost required to wait for the same period increases.
Rising interest rates do not just mean higher borrowing costs.
They mean that the cost of deferring management decisions increases.
Waiting just one more quarter eats away at a company's time
Suppose a new business is six months behind its original plan.
Sales are starting to materialize.
However, the monthly deficit has not shrunk.
Customer feedback is not bad, and it is not in a state where it can be concluded that there is no future.
In management meetings, such opinions are voiced.
Let's wait just one more quarter.
Since we have invested this much, it would be a waste to stop now.
As long as sales are starting to grow, it will become profitable if we wait a little longer.
The decision to wait is not necessarily a mistake.
A certain period of time is required to verify a business.
However, to wait those three months, you must continue to pay:
personnel costs,
advertising costs,
system costs,
and outsourcing costs.
If you are using borrowed money, interest will also accrue.
Furthermore, by continuing to spend funds on that business, the capital available for existing operations or other growth investments also decreases.
The question to ask at this point is not just whether that business has future potential.
Can the company wait until that future potential can be confirmed?
What is needed is not the magnitude of expectations, but a comparison between the funds required to wait and the time remaining for the company.
---
The premise of being able to use cheap capital for a long time has changed
On July 31, 2026, the Bank of Japan kept its policy interest rate at around 1.0%. The US Federal Reserve also kept its policy rate at 3.50-3.75% on July 29. In Japan, the policy rate has risen to 1%, and high interest rate levels continue in the United States as well.
What managers should be thinking about is not when the next rate hike or cut will occur.
It is whether they should continue with business plans created on the premise that cheap capital could be used for a long period.
Just because the policy interest rate has risen does not mean that all borrowing rates will rise on the same day by the same amount.
Is it a fixed or variable interest rate? When is the next interest rate review date? When will refinancing be necessary? The timing of the impact on your company varies depending on the contract.
First, you need to list your company's borrowings and estimate how much your annual interest payments will increase if the applicable interest rate rises by 0.5% or 1.0%.
However, what you really need to look at is not just the amount of increased interest.
How many months of investment capacity and decision-making leeway will be lost due to that burden?
Translating interest rate hikes into management means confirming exactly that.
---
The three types of time a company must manage
In daily transactions, the time until cash returns
Even if sales are recorded, it does not necessarily mean that cash has entered the company.
Even for projects with a gross profit,
if it takes six months from start to payment, the company must continue to front the labor costs, outsourcing costs, and purchase costs during that time.
For companies that hold inventory,
funds are tied up from the moment of purchase, and even after the product is sold, they must wait until payment is received.
In a low-interest-rate environment, it was easy to absorb these time lags with borrowed money.
If interest rates rise, the burden of tying up funds to earn the same gross profit becomes heavier.
What you need to look at is not just the gross profit margin.
How much capital is tied up, and for how many months, to earn that gross profit?
Even for profitable work, if the period until it becomes cash is long, a large amount of working capital will be required.
The ability to generate sales alone is not enough.
The ability to quickly convert generated sales into cash becomes necessary.
--
The time until growth investments are recovered
Hiring, new businesses, advertising, and capital investment.
Every investment has a period between expenditure and recovery.
Until now,
"the market is growing,"
"future profits will be made,"
"we are currently in the upfront investment stage"
some companies were able to wait for long-term growth based on these explanations.
However, if the interest rate environment changes, the time allowed for investment also changes.
When will sales be generated?
When will cash be received?
How much additional funding is needed until recovery?
Can the company withstand it if it is six months behind schedule?
At what number will you stop additional investment?
Even if an investment is good, if there is no capital to support it until recovery, the business cannot be sustained.
Do not look only at the potential for growth.
You must judge whether the company can survive until that growth can be confirmed.
The time to correct a wrong decision
This is the time most easily overlooked.
The business is performing below plan.
Inventory continues to increase.
Hiring plans are not leading to the projected sales or productivity.
Even so,
“It will change if we wait a little longer”
“Let's wait and see until the next quarter”
Decisions are postponed by these words.
Waiting itself is not the problem.
The problem is continuing to wait without setting deadlines or conditions.
While interest rates were low, it was easy to absorb delays in judgment with capital.
When interest rates rise, the financial burden incurred while holding off on decisions becomes heavier than before.
The decision to “wait a little longer” is not the problem.
The problem is not deciding how long to wait.
---
The problem is not past decisions, but failing to update the criteria
Making an investment that takes time to recover during an era of low interest rates was not a mistake in itself.
If the cost of capital is low and long-term growth can be expected, upfront investment is also rational.
The problem is not past decisions.
Investing when interest rates were low is not the problem
The problem is continuing to use the same payback periods,
the same deficit margins,
and the same exit criteria even after interest rates have risen.
A business that could wait a year in the past might now require a decision in six months.
Inventory levels that were acceptable in the past might now be tying up too much capital.
Payment terms that were not an issue in the past might now be putting pressure on working capital.
Management is not about sticking to standards once they are set.
It is about resetting those standards when the premises change.
---
Three things managers must decide again
Accelerate cash conversion
Review payment terms, billing cycles, down payments, advance payments, and acceptance conditions.
For inventory that does not move for long periods, decide how long to hold it, and whether to discount, dispose of, or stop purchasing it once that deadline passes.
The goal is not just to increase sales.
It is to reduce the number of days capital remains tied up.
Decide criteria for continuing investments
How long will you continue new business ventures, hiring, and advertising investments?
What figures must be achieved to continue?
If they are not achieved, will you stop additional investment, scale down, or withdraw?
Do not justify current cash outflows solely with the word 'potential'.
What is needed for continuation decisions is not expectation.
It is deadlines and conditions.
Set a decision date before funds run out
How many months can the company survive with its current cash and deposits?
Check based on actual cash inflow and outflow schedules, not sales plans.
However, simply knowing the day you run out of cash is too late.
You must decide what to determine, and by how many months in advance.
Negotiations with financial institutions.
Price revisions.
Halting investments.
Downsizing operations.
Withdrawal.
These options cannot be chosen once the funds are gone.
---
Standards you can use tomorrow
First, I would like you to check the following three things.
When will the funds used for sales and investments return as cash?
How long will you continue businesses that are underperforming against the plan?
Does your current decision reduce the options available to the company six months from now?
Rising interest rates shorten the grace period left for a company.
What exhausts that limited grace period is decision-making without deadlines.
How long will you wait?
At what point will you stop if performance falls below a certain level?
What will you change while you still have funds remaining?
A company does not suddenly break on the day it runs out of funds.
It breaks when it loses its options one by one and can no longer choose anything.
In a phase where interest rates are rising, it is not enough to just be able to raise funds.
You must also design what to use those funds for, when to recover them, and at what point to stop.
In the related article,
"Fundraising | Companies that only collect money cannot design their next growth—Management design that separates defensive finance from offensive finance"
I summarize how to separate the funds used to protect the company from the funds used for the next growth.
If reading this article made you feel there is a deadline you want to review first, please let me know in the comments to the extent you are comfortable.
If this article helps you rethink your management decisions, I would be happy if you could like or follow.
いいなと思ったら応援しよう!
この記事は noteマネー にピックアップされました

