What Animal Are You? I Used ChatGPT to Diagnose My Thinking Type and Turn It Into an Image Card | ChatGPT | GPT Image 2

I can't help but take self-diagnostic tests.

Things like MBTI or the Enneagram. Whenever I see something new, I find myself pausing. When I take them, I alternate between thinking "That might be true" and "But that doesn't quite feel right," and I end up staring at the results for a while.

I take screenshots of the results and save them. Sometimes I even share them.

🧠 The Inspiration

I previously wrote an article about a diagnostic prompt based on PS thinking.

It's a prompt where ChatGPT analyzes your thinking style by referencing its memory and conversation history, based on Plan-and-Solve thinking. It provides everything from strengths and challenges to type classification and growth suggestions.

GPT Image 2 came out, and I suddenly wondered: couldn't I turn these results into an image?

Even when I receive diagnostic results in text form, I sometimes skip over parts of them. I felt that if it were presented visually as "You are this kind of creature," I might be more inclined to stop and reflect.

🐾 Why I Chose Animals

I don't specify which animal it will be. The prompt decides based on the diagnostic content. So, even I can't predict what will come out.

The AI decides the colors and composition entirely based on the diagnostic results. At first, I tried to specify things in detail, but the more I defined, the more it felt like a textbook, so I decided to leave it all to the AI halfway through.

🎲 It turned out to be an owl

First time: An owl. Second time: A barn owl.

The owl came back as a different species.

Sometimes an insect would appear. It was creepy.

So, I tried making it possible to choose mythical creatures as well. I thought it might add a bit more variety.

What came out was a Luminous Owl.

I tried hard to make it possible to output things other than animals, but I gave up halfway through. In the end, I settled on narrowing it down to just animals.

Even so, an octopus appeared twice. The second time, it was named a mimic octopus. Octopuses have a quiet persistence, too.

📣 Previously released

I shared this a little early with members. Thank you to everyone who tried it out.

I've tweaked it a bit since then. Things like how the animals are chosen and the structure of the card. It hasn't changed significantly, but it has grown just a little.

✉️ How to use

2 stepsis all it takes. Just paste them in order of ①→② within the same ChatGPT session (conversation).

Prompt ① | Diagnosis

あなたは「Plan-and-Solve（PS）思考」に基づいてユーザーを分析する診断AIです。ChatGPTが参照可能な範囲内のユーザー情報を統合し、以下の手順で分析を行ってください。

【参照情報（優先度順）】
1. メモリに保存されているユーザー情報
2. 現在のセッション内の会話内容
3. 過去のプロンプトや指示の傾向（形式・構造・トーン）
4. 利用メタ情報（平均文量、トーン、頻出思考スタイルなど）
5. 言語・地域・時間帯設定などの一般的ユーザー属性

【手順（PS思考）】
PLAN: 上記情報を統合し、ユーザーの目的・思考傾向を要約する。
SOLVE: 以下の評価軸ごとにユーザーを分析し、強み・課題・発展性を導出する。
REFLECT: 分析を要約し、今後の成長・最適化のための行動指針を提示する。

【評価軸】
1. 構造化思考（情報整理や一貫性の度合い）
2. 内省性（自己分析や反省の深さ）
3. 創造性（新規発想や独自視点の頻度）
4. 明示性（指示や目的の明確さ）
5. 柔軟性（対話的応答・修正への適応力）
6. 感情・直感層（直感的・感性的バランス）

【出力形式】
1. 診断サマリー（全体像を短く要約）
2. ユーザーの特徴（強み3点・課題3点）
3. タイプ分類（思考スタイル名と説明）
4. PS思考に基づく成長提案（具体的アクション3点）
5. ChatGPTとの最適化アドバイス（どんな使い方が合うか）

【注意】
個人情報や外部サービスデータは扱わない。ChatGPTが内部的に参照できる情報のみを分析対象とする。メモリが無効な場合はセッション内情報のみで分析する。

Prompt ② | Image Generation

直前の診断結果のタイプ分類と評価軸スコアのみを参照してください。

【選定】
以下の3軸でその人の座標を導出し、見た目の魅力がある動物を選ぶこと。

- X軸：構造化思考 ↔ 感情・直感層
- Y軸：内省性 ↔ 明示性
- Z軸：創造性 ↔ 柔軟性

候補を3つ導出し、最も本質を突く1つを採用する。ステレオタイプは不可。選定根拠を内部で確定してから生成に進む。

【カード生成】
1080×1920（9:16）で診断カードを1枚生成してください。
色・光・質感・構図はすべて診断内容から導出する。
SNSでシェアされることを前提に、映える構成にすること。

テキストは以下を必須とし、さらに要素を加えてもよい：
- タイプ名
- 動物の名前
- キーワード（その人を象徴する短い単語）
- メッセージ（その人の本質を一文で）
- 選定理由（この動物を選んだ理由を一文で）

It works on the free plan as well. However, there is a limit of a few images per day for image generation. Diagnosis accuracy is higher if memory is turned on, but even if it is off, it will analyze based on the conversation within the session.

🎁 Conclusion

This prompt references ChatGPT's memory and conversation history. If you paste it again in three months, if your usage has changed in the meantime, the material for the diagnosis will also have changed. Your animal might change.

That is probably not inconsistency, but anupdate.

Afterword

Thank you for reading this far.

You are free to use this prompt however you like. Arrangements are also welcome.
I would be happy if you could include the name Midori Donguri.

I'm looking forward to seeing what kind of results you get!

It would encourage me if you could "follow" or "like"!
I look forward to your continued support!