Reply to discussion on ‘Peat slope failures and other mass movements in western Ireland, August 2008’ by A. P. Dykes & P. Jennings Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology , 44, 5–16
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 2011
We thank Long & Boylan for their interest in our paper (Dykes & Jennings 2011) and for ta... more We thank Long & Boylan for their interest in our paper (Dykes & Jennings 2011) and for taking the trouble to comment on it. Indeed, their more detailed account of the rainfall at Tralee, near the large peat flow at Ballincollig Hill, is both relevant and informative. Our comment that ‘there was no triggering rainfall event for this landslide’ assumed the definition of a landslide ‘trigger’ to be a very short-term (seconds to hours) high-magnitude external disturbing influence that is immediately followed by the initiation of failure. In the absence of any evidence of excessive drying owing to prolonged dry summer weather, we implicitly assumed the peat to be in its normal (near-) saturated condition. The observations by Long & Boylan are of course entirely valid for this condition. The definition of what constitutes a ‘triggering rainfall event’ for a landslide is perhaps worthy of further consideration given that in some hillslope systems there may be a significant delay between a rainfall event and the development of pore water pressures in some critical configuration to initiate failure. This is more likely in bedrock landslides associated with deep water tables than in shallow hillslope systems. However, there are a few examples of blanket peat landslides in Ireland that were not triggered by a specific heavy rainfall event (Hendrick 1990; Wilson & Hegarty 1993). In particular, the 1984 Straduff Townland bogflow mentioned in our paper, which occurred after only 25 mm of rain falling over 3 days (Alexander et al . 1986), indicates the possibility of such delayed …
Uploads
Papers by Alan Dykes