Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online May 5, 2022
Request permissions

Is Citizen Science a Remedy for Inequality?

Bruce V. Lewenstein [email protected]View all authors and affiliations
Volume 700, Issue 1
https://doi.org/10.1177/00027162221092697

Abstract

Is public engagement with science an effective response to threats against science? One form of public engagement—citizen science—might be especially useful for addressing issues of inequality that threaten public support for science. Citizen science is both public participation in the scientific process and public participation in the governance of science. In principle, citizen science empowers marginalized communities to participate in the scientific process, using the authority of science to challenge government, industry, or other institutions that exploit imbalances of social power. In practice, however, citizen science can also be used to redirect attention away from actions that address inequalities and to reinforce modes of knowledge production that exclude alternative ways of knowing relevant to those without social power. Thus, rhetoric about citizen science as a solution to threats against science needs to be tempered with attention to specific contexts and opportunities.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

Get Access

References

Ballard Heidi L., Huntsinger Lynn. 2006. Salal harvester local ecological knowledge, harvest practices and understory management on the Olympic Peninsula, Washington. Human Ecology 34 (4): 529–47. Available from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-006-9048-7.
Google Scholar
Beckwith Jonathan R. 2002. Making genes, making waves: A social activist in science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Besley John C., Lee Nicole M., Pressgrove Geah. 2021. Reassessing the variables used to measure public perceptions of scientists. Science Communication 43 (1): 3–32. Available from https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020949547.
Google Scholar
Blacker Sarah, Kimura Aya H., Kinchy Abby. 2021. When citizen science is public relations. Social Studies of Science, online ahead of print. Available from https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127211027662.
Google Scholar
Blake Charlie, Rhanor Allison, Pajic Cody. 2020. The demographics of citizen science participation and its implications for data quality and environmental justice. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 5 (1): Art. 21. Available from https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.320.
Google Scholar
Bonney Rick. 1996. Citizen science: A lab tradition [Project FeederWatch, FeederWatch in the Classroom, Project Tanager, Project PigeonWatch, Cornell Nest Box Network]. Living Bird, 7–15.
Google Scholar
Bonney Rick. 2021. Expanding the impact of citizen science. BioScience 71 (5): 448–51. Available from https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biab041.
Google Scholar
Bonney Rick, Ballard Heidi, Jordan Rebecca, McCallie Ellen, Phillips Tina, Shirk Jennifer, Wilderman Candie C. 2009. Participation in scientific research: Defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education. Washington, DC: Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education.
Google Scholar
Bonney Rick, Phillips Tina B., Ballard Heidi L., Enck Jody W. 2016. Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science? Public Understanding of Science 25 (1): 2–16. Available from https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515607406.
Google Scholar
Bonney Rick, Shirk Jennifer L., Phillips Tina B., Wiggins Andrea, Ballard Heidi L., Miller-Rushing Abraham J., Parrish Julia K. 2014. Next steps for citizen science. Science 343 (6178): 1436–37. Available from https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251554.
Google Scholar
Brossard Dominique, Lewenstein Bruce V., Bonney Rick. 2005. Scientific knowledge and attitude change: The impact of a citizen science project. International Journal of Science Education 27 (9): 1099–1121.
Crossref
Web of Science
Google Scholar
Cooper Caren B., Hawn Chris L., Larson Lincoln R., Parrish Julia K., Bowser Gillian, Cavalier Darlene, Dunn Robert R., Haklay Mordechai, Gupta Kaberi Kar, Jelks Na, et al. 2021. Inclusion in citizen science: The conundrum of rebranding. Science 372 (6549). Available from https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abi6487.
Google Scholar
Cooper Caren B., Lewenstein Bruce. 2016. Two meanings of citizen science. In The rightful place of science: Citizen science, eds. Cavalier D., Kennedy E. B., 51–62. Tempe, AZ: Consortium for Science, Policy & Outcomes.
Google Scholar
Dawson Emily. 2019. Equity, exclusion, and everyday science learning: The experiences of minoritised groups. London: Routledge.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Eitzel M. V., Cappadonna Jessica L., Santos-Lang Chris, Duerr Ruth Ellen, Virapongse Arika, West Sarah Elizabeth, Conrad Christopher, Kyba Maximillian, Bowser Anne, Cooper Caren Beth, et al. 2017. Citizen science terminology matters: Exploring key terms. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 2 (1): 1–20. Available from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.96.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Feinstein Noah Weeth. 2015. Education, communication, and science in the public sphere. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 52 (2): 145–63. Available from https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21192.
Google Scholar
Gonzalez Priscilla A., Minkler Meredith, Garcia Analilla P., Gordon Margaret, Garzón Catalina, Palanlappan Meena, Prakash Swati, Beveridge Brian. 2011. Community-based participatory research and policy advocacy to reduce diesel exposure in West Oakland, California. American Journal of Public Health 101:S166–S175. Available from https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2010.196204.
Google Scholar
Haklay Muki. 2016. Why is participation inequality important? In European handbook of crowdsources geographic information, eds. Capineri C., Haklay M., Huang H., Antoniou V., Kettunen J., Ostermann F., Purves R., 35–44. London: Ubiquity Press. Available from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5334/bax.c.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Hohn Donovan. 16 August 2016. The zealot: Flint’s water crisis and the “troublemaker” scientist. New York Times Sunday Magazine.
Google Scholar
Howlett Robin, Sitbon Laurianne, Hoogstrate Maria, Balasuriya Saminda Sundeepa. 2021. Accessible citizen science, by people with intellectual disability. Presented at the 23rd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, Virtual Event. Available from https://doi.org/10.1145/3441852.3476558.
Google Scholar
Irwin Alan. 1995. Citizen science: A study of people, expertise, and sustainable development. New York, NY: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Kimura Aya H., Kinchy Abby. 2020. Citizen science in North American agri-food systems: Lessons learned. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 5 (1). Available from https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.246.
Google Scholar
Kinchy Abby, Parks Sarah, Jalbert Kirk. 2016. Fractured knowledge: Mapping the gaps in public and private water monitoring efforts in areas affected by shale gas development. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 34 (5): 879–99. Available from https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774x15614684.
Google Scholar
Kollipara Puneet. 2014. Science in the spotlight as New York state bans fracking. Science. Available from http://doi.org/10.1126/article.71678.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Lewenstein Bruce V. 2012. Public engagement. Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education. Available from https://www.informalscience.org/news-views/public-engagement (accessed 2 September 2021).
Google Scholar
Lewenstein Bruce V. 2016. Can we understand citizen science? JCOM: Journal of Science Communication 15 (1). Available from http://jcom.sissa.it/archive/15/01/JCOM_1501_2016_E.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Lewenstein Bruce V. 2020. Public engagement, power, and communities. Presented at Public Engagement with Science: Defining and Measuring Success [online conference]. Available from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NldHrETwKSU.
Google Scholar
Lewis E. Yvonne, Sadler Richard C. 2021. Community-academic partnerships helped Flint through its water crisis. Nature 594:326–29.
Crossref
Web of Science
Google Scholar
Liebenberg Louis, //Ao /Am, Lombard Marlize, Shermer Michael, Xhukwe /Uase, Biesele Megan, //xao Di, Carruthers Peter, Kxao ≠Oma, Hansson Sven Ove, et al. 2021. Tracking science: An alternative for those excluded by citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 6 (1). Available from https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.284.
Google Scholar
Markowitz Gerald, Rosner David. 2016. Citizen scientists and the lessons of Flint. Milbank Quarterly. Available from https://www.milbank.org/quarterly/articles/citizen-scientists-lessons-flint/.
Google Scholar
Márquez Melissa C., Porras Ana Maria. 2020. Science communication in multiple languages is critical to its effectiveness [Opinion]. Frontiers in Communication 5 (31). Available from https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00031.
Google Scholar
Mazzocchi Fulvio. 2006, Western science and traditional knowledge. EMBO Reports 7:463–66. Available from https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400693.
Google Scholar
Medin Douglas L., Bang Megan. 2014. The cultural side of science communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (suppl. 4): 13621–26. Available from https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317510111.
Google Scholar
Ottinger Gwen. 2016. Citizen engineers at the fenceline. Issues in Science and Technology 32 (2). Available from https://issues.org/citizen-engineers-at-the-fenceline/.
Google Scholar
Ottinger Gwen. 2017a. Crowdsourcing undone science. Engaging Science, Technology, & Society 3:560–74. Available from https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2017.124.
Google Scholar
Ottinger Gwen. 2017b. Reconstructing or reproducing: Scientific authority and models of change in two traditions of citizen science. In The Routledge handbook of the political economy of science, eds. Tyfield D., Lave R., Randalls S., Thorpe C., 351–63. London: Routledge. Available from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/cornell/detail.action?docID=4851449.
Google Scholar
Ottinger Gwen, Sarantschin Elisa. 2017. Exposing infrastructure: How activists and experts connect ambient air monitoring and environmental health. Environmental Sociology 3 (2): 155–65. Available from https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2016.1226690.
Google Scholar
Paleco Carole, García Peter Sabina, Seoane Nora Salas, Kaufmann Julia, Argyri Panagiota. 2021. Inclusiveness and diversity in citizen science. In The science of citizen science, eds. Vohland K., Land-Zandstra A., Ceccaroni L., Lemmens R., Perelló J., Ponti M., Samson R., Wagenknecht K., 261–81. Cham: Springer International Publishing. Available from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_14.
Google Scholar
Pandya Rajul. 2012. A framework for engaging diverse communities in citizen science in the U.S. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10 (6): 314–17. Available from https://doi.org/10.1890/120007.
Google Scholar
Pandya Rajul, Dibner Kenne Ann, eds. 2018. Learning through citizen science: Enhancing opportunities by design. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Available from https://doi.org/10.17226/25183.
Google Scholar
Pateman Rachel, Dyke Alison, West Sarah. 2021. The diversity of participants in environmental citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 6 (1). Available from https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.369.
Google Scholar
Pauli Benjamin J. 2019. Flint fights back: Environmental justice and democracy in the Flint water crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Phillips Tina, Ballard Heidi, Bonney Rick, Lewenstein Bruce V. 2019. Examining engagement in science through citizen science: Moving beyond data collection. Science Education 103 (3): 665–90. Available from https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21501.
Google Scholar
Purcell Karen, Garibay Cecilia, Dickinson Janis L. 2012. A gateway to science for all. In Citizen science: Public participation in environmental research, eds. Dickinson J. L., Bonney R. E., 191–200. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Available from https://doi.org/10.7591/9780801463952-020.
Google Scholar
Roche Joseph, Bell Laura, Galvão Cecília, Golumbic Yaela N., Kloetzer Laure, Knoben Nieke, Laakso Mari, Lorke Julia, Mannion Greg, Massetti Lucian, et al. 2020. Citizen science, education, and learning: Challenges and opportunities. Frontiers in Sociology 5 (110). Available from https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2020.613814.
Google Scholar
Schneider Stephen H. 2000. Is the “scientist-advocate” an oxymoron? In Science, technology & democracy, ed. Kleinman D. L., 103–20. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Google Scholar
Shirk Jennifer L., Ballard Heidi L., Wilderman Candie C., Phillips Tina, Wiggins Andrea, Jordan Rebecca, McCallie Ellen, Minarchek Matthew, Lewenstein Bruce V., Krasny Marianne E., et al. 2012. Public participation in scientific research: A framework for intentional design. Ecology and Society 17 (2): 29–48. Available from https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04705-170229.
Google Scholar
Shirk Jennifer L., Bonney Rick. 2018. Scientific impacts and innovations of citizen science. In Citizen science, eds. Hecker Susanne, Haklay Muki, Bowser Anne, Makuch Zen, Vogel Johannes, Bonn Aletta, 41–51. London: UCL Press. Available from http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv550cf2.10.
Google Scholar
Southwell Brian, Corin Deanna, Eck Montana, Hessenius Angela, Li Leslie, Magnuson Audrey, Parkman Joanna, Sauer Rebecca, Turner Callie, Stansbury Shane. 2021. Dimensions of trust and information seeking on natural disasters, hazards, and extreme weather in North Carolina (USA). EMS Annual Meeting 2021, 6–10 September 2021. Available from https://doi.org/10.5194/ems2021-25.
Google Scholar
Spiers Helen, Swanson Alexandra, Fortson Lucy, Simmons Brooke, Trouille Laura, Blickhan Samantha, Lintott Chris. 2019. Everyone counts? Design considerations in online citizen science JCOM: Journal of Science Communication 18 (1). Available from https://doi.org/10.22323/2.18010204.
Google Scholar
Stevens Matthias, Vitos Michalis, Altenbuchner Julia, Conquest Gillian, Lewi Jerome, Haklay Muki. 2014. Taking participatory citizen science to extremes. IEEE Pervasive Computing 13 (2): 20–29. Available from https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2014.37.
Google Scholar
Walker David W., Smigaj Magdalena, Tani Masakazu. 2021. The benefits and negative impacts of citizen science applications to water as experienced by participants and communities. WIREs Water 8 (1): e1488. Available from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1488.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Weingart Peter, Joubert Marina, Connoway Karien. 2021. Public engagement with science—Origins, motives and impact in academic literature and science policy. PLOS ONE 16 (7): e0254201. Available from https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254201.
Google Scholar
Woodward Holly, Carneiro Barbara, Safaya Smriti, Woods Tim. 2021. Third international ECSA conference report: Encounters in citizen science. Zenodo. Available from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4558787.
Google Scholar
Wünsche Hannes, Schimmler Sonja. 2019. Citizen science and the dissolution of inequalities in scientific knowledge production. Presented at Weizenbaum Conference 2019, “Challenges of Digital Inequality - Digital Education, Digital Work, Digital Life,” Berlin. Available from https://doi.org/10.34669/wi.cp/2.28.
Google Scholar
Yearley Steve, Cinderby Steve, Forrester John, Bailey Peter, Rosen Paul. 2003. Participatory modelling and the local governance of the politics of UK air pollution: A three-city case study. Environmental Values 12:247–62.
Crossref
Web of Science
Google Scholar

Biographies

Bruce V. Lewenstein is a professor of science communication at Cornell University in the Departments of Communication and of Science & Technology Studies. Trained as a historian of science, he works across the field of public communication of science and technology, including informal science education, citizen science, and communication training for scientists.
|

Also from Sage