User talk:H2so4aq

Welcome!

Hi H2so4aq! I noticed your contributions to Center for Study of Science, Technology and Policy (CSTEP) and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Tacyarg (talk) 20:07, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of small modular reactor designs, a link pointing to the disambiguation page MSR was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kairos Power, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nuclear energy was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Requests

Just a reminder to put your signature on any request you take on the Guild of Copyeditors Requests page so that other people won't accidentally claim it as well, like you did with USS Iowa turret explosion. Mox Eden (talk) 10:28, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Ah, my apologies; I was unaware. I see you already marked it as partly completed by me; should I add a note there still? H2so4aq (talk) 16:28, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Yes, please put a {{Done}} tag to the request. But I didn't mark it as partly done by you, the tag refers to me because you already completed the request. Mox Eden (talk) 23:32, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Done!H2so4aq (talk) 23:43, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

March 2026 GOCE drive awards

		The (old school) League of Copy Editors Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to H2so4aq for copy edits totaling over 15,000 words (including rollover words) during the GOCE March 2026 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! GoldRomean (talk) 23:29, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

		Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Total Articles, 4th Place
		This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to H2so4aq for copyediting 6 articles during the GOCE March 2026 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! GoldRomean (talk) 23:29, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

		Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Total Words, 1st Place
		This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to H2so4aq for copyediting 25,511 total words during the GOCE March 2026 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! GoldRomean (talk) 23:29, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

		Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Long Articles, 1st Place
		This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to H2so4aq for copyediting 3 long articles during the GOCE March 2026 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! GoldRomean (talk) 23:29, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

		Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Old Articles, 4th Place
		This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to H2so4aq for copyediting 4 old articles during the GOCE March 2026 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! GoldRomean (talk) 23:29, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

		Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Longest Article, 1st Place
		This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to H2so4aq for copyediting one of the five longest articles – 10,863 words – during the GOCE March 2026 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! GoldRomean (talk) 23:29, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

Random aside

This relates to absolutely nothing, but I only just now realized that your username is aqueous sulfuric acid. As a scientist, I'm ashamed I didn't recognize it immediately. XD EducatedRedneck (talk) 17:44, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for noticing! Honestly, I've been using this handle for so long that I sometimes forget it means sulfuric acid until someone brings it up. H2so4aq (talk) 20:57, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Oregon State University College of Engineering (Research)

I am seeing evidence of edit warring by your continued reverts on this page. Please provide evidence before making changes to who is credited for the invention of the SMR on the talk page. A section has been established to continue this discussion. Ongoing reverts will be reported. Ludviggy (talk) 04:21, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Uranium-233

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Uranium-233, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:22, 20 June 2026 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Droop quota on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 10:30, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Windows 11 version history on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 09:31, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

Fixing issues and confusion

Hi @H2so4aq: I see that you are interested in editing pages on Nuclear Power, and so am I. I have been involved in creation, editing and updation of the page Bharat Small Modular Reactor. But some sources pose ambiguity regarding the nature of the reactor, some use the term Bharat Small Reactor (BSR) and others use BSMR. They generally term the BSMR to be a PWR while the BSR to be a PHWR. Please could you take some of your valuable time and pains for the analysis of the concerned sources and clear this confusion so as to fix the page. I think it would be the best if we collaborate in this regard. The article may need significant revisions, for which I would open a topic on its talk if necessary. Please let me know. Thanks. IND123456 (talk) 04:17, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

Certainly, I'd be happy to help. Give me some time to look through the sources; I'll try to find new ones too if possible. That should help a lot with clearing up the ambiguous terminology. H2so4aq (talk) 06:35, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

Sure, you may take your time. Thanks for your cooperation. IND123456 (talk) 09:45, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

Could you give an update if any regarding your said analysis of the said page? I would also like to invite you to through my manuscript, Draft:Partial meltdown of Leningrad unit 1 and Chernobyl unit 1 and build Draft:Rig-Veda-Sanhita, The Sacred Hymns Of The Brahmans. IND123456 (talk) 12:32, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

@H2so4aq I hope you are aware of my invitation and you may be working on it. Thanks IND123456 (talk) 10:26, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Violence by UFO believers on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 23:30, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Feedback for Radiant Nuclear

I reviewed this article as part of the Wikipedia:New pages patrol process. Excellent work; I wish every new article about a company would be as well-thought as this is. -- Reconrabbit (talk) 20:55, 24 August 2026 (UTC)

Thank you! I've had to clean up several poorly written/promotional articles about nuclear companies so I tried to make it as comprehensive (and neutral) as possible! H2so4aq (talk) 21:06, 24 August 2026 (UTC)

DYK for Radiant Nuclear

On 27 September 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Radiant Nuclear, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a factory making portable nuclear reactors is being built on an old Manhattan Project site in Tennessee? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Radiant Nuclear. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (Radiant Nuclear), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:02, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Radiant Nuclear is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Radiant Nuclear is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Operator 16 -- Operator 16 (talk) 14:28, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Radiant Nuclear

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Radiant Nuclear, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add a title to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help). Below are the references causing this error:
  • World Nuclear News. 2025-08-15 https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/articles/equinix-signs-further-agreements-with-smr-developers. Retrieved 2026-09-30. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:54, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Radiant Nuclear has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Radiant Nuclear has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Operator 16 -- Operator 16 (talk) 19:29, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Good job on that page! You more than earned the GA! Good luck on future pages and dont forget about the pledge =D — Preceding unsigned comment added by Operator 16 (talk • contribs) 19:35, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Thank you! I'll be starting on the pledge right away! H2so4aq (talk) 19:50, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of SEFOR is under review

Your good article nomination of the article SEFOR is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RadioactOlive -- RadioactOlive (talk) 02:48, 5 October 2026 (UTC)

Hi H2so4aq, I placed the review under hold for a few small things. Please see the review page to see the particular things I want to see before I can promote the article for GA. Thanks. radioactOlive_(she/it)(talk) 02:41, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of SEFOR has passed

Your good article nomination of the article SEFOR has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RadioactOlive -- RadioactOlive (talk) 04:29, 6 October 2026 (UTC)