Talk:Medicine

"Academic Medicine" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Academic Medicine has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 20 § Academic Medicine until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 23:10, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Reliability(History - India)

In India, the surgeon Sushruta described numerous surgical operations, including the earliest forms of plastic surgery.

1. Reliability on the first source: First source named "We need to think and act" published in Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery in 2003 by Singh A, Sarangi D is in a letter format(correspondence)to its editor by individuals from personal perspective who are not subject experts(history on medicine), hence unreliable. This citation was already tagged dubious back in 2010. Should the citation be kept as its unreliability is evident?
2. Reliability on the second source: The second source named Rana RE, Arora BS (2002). "History of plastic surgery in India". Journal of Postgraduate Medicine. has the abstract of the kind as shown below

Abstract: The earliest replantations were done by Lord Shiva by attaching an elephant's head on his son's body and by Ashwini Kumars who successfully replanted the severed head of Yagna. Thus the history of plastic surgery in India dates as far back or before the Vedic times nearly 4000 years ago. See https://www.bioline.org.br/abstract?jp02024 It is evident from the Abstract itself that how reliable would that publication be as the author is directly crediting science to mythology and deities, an Indian version of Young Earth Creationism, ie., using religion and scriptures to explain science. There is already a huge existing trend in articles or sections within an article of Wikipedia relating to Ancient India and Mediaeval India citing such publications of Indian origin which contains heavy embellishments of the actual fact. Needs special attention when dealing with such sections or articles. അദ്വൈതൻ (talk) 14:53, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

References

"Medical community" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Medical community has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 August 30 § Medical community until a consensus is reached. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 16:58, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

Question and report

At equation survey,

In our area 50 peoples in a 1000 are working in invisible cloths, but in total India how many people are working in invisible clothes ? 47.11.86.226 (talk) 18:41, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

Improving top-importance medicine articles: Join the Vital Signs campaign 2026

The goal of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/Vital Signs 2026 campaign is to bring all 101 top-importance articles—including this one—up to at least B-class quality. Many of these articles are widely read but overdue for review, so even small improvements can have a big impact.

If you watch or edit this article, your help would be very welcome. You can:

1. Add yourself as a participant
2. Note the state of the article in the Progress table (is the current class still correct?)
3. Update the article based on recent clinical guidelines and review papers
4. Help address gaps, improve clarity for a broad audience, or improve image selection

To reach B class, articles should have: suitable referencing, reasonable coverage, a clear structure, good prose, helpful illustrations, and be understandable to a broad audience. Contributions of any size are appreciated. Femke (talk) 16:00, 20 December 2025 (UTC)