Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1976 Aug;66(8):761-7.
doi: 10.2105/ajph.66.8.761.

Efficacy information in contraceptive counseling: those little white lies

Efficacy information in contraceptive counseling: those little white lies

T J Trussell et al. Am J Public Health. 1976 Aug.

Abstract

Various procedures for estimating the effectiveness of a method of contraception have been devised. These measures, in turn, have been used in populations which differ widely in their propensity to use contraceptives properly. Therefore, a wide array of failure rates is available in the family planning literature. Unfortunately, because of differences in measurement and in choice of population, a random selection of these reported failure rates will not produce a consistent ordinal or cardinal ranking of methods by their effectiveness. Moreover, such a wide variety or reported rates permits the family planning practitioner to choose selectively in order to maximize the attractiveness of his favorite method(s). By surveying family planning personnel in two major cities, we found that they do indeen appear to place the methods they actively dispense in an extremely favorable position. Specifically, they are biased against the traditional contraceptives, foam and the condom. In this paper, we discuss the theoretical underpinnings of the measurement of effectiveness, report the apparent bias in the levels of contraceptive effectiveness reported to the patient, and finally, recommend a procedure for eliminating the jumble of rates in the literature and the consequent confusion among family planning personnel.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Pa Med J. 1965 Apr;68:31-4 - PubMed
    1. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1960 Apr;38:140-52 - PubMed
    1. Fam Plann Perspect. 1973 Summer;5(3):133-42 - PubMed
    1. Contraception. 1975 Jan;11(1):1-13 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources