Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2016 Mar 1;7(2):e00158.
doi: 10.1128/mBio.00158-16.

Revolutionary Science

Affiliations
Editorial

Revolutionary Science

Arturo Casadevall et al. mBio. .

Abstract

On rare occasions in the history of science, remarkable discoveries transform human society and forever alter mankind's view of the world. Examples of such discoveries include the heliocentric theory, Newtonian physics, the germ theory of disease, quantum theory, plate tectonics and the discovery that DNA carries genetic information. The science philosopher Thomas Kuhn famously described science as long periods of normality punctuated by times of crisis, when anomalous observations culminate in revolutionary changes that replace one paradigm with another. This essay examines several transformative discoveries in the light of Kuhn's formulation. We find that each scientific revolution is unique, with disparate origins that may include puzzle solving, serendipity, inspiration, or a convergence of disparate observations. The causes of revolutionary science are varied and lack an obvious common structure. Moreover, it can be difficult to draw a clear distinction between so-called normal and revolutionary science. Revolutionary discoveries often emerge from basic science and are critically dependent on nonrevolutionary research. Revolutionary discoveries may be conceptual or technological in nature, lead to the creation of new fields, and have a lasting impact on many fields in addition to the field from which they emerge. In contrast to political revolutions, scientific revolutions do not necessarily require the destruction of the previous order. For humanity to continue to benefit from revolutionary discoveries, a broad palette of scientific inquiry with a particular emphasis on basic science should be supported.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Kuhn TS. 1970. The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
    1. Toulmin S. 1970. Does the distinction between normal and revolutionary science hold water?, p 39–48. In Lakatos I, Musgrave A (ed), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
    1. Watkins J. 1970. Against ‘normal science’, p 25–38. In Lakatos I, Musgrave A (ed), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
    1. Wilkins AS. 1996. Are there ‘Kuhnian’ revolutions in biology? Bioessays 18:695–696.
    1. Casadevall A, Fang FC. 2008. Descriptive science. Infect Immun 76:3835–3836. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00743-08. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources