Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Jun;30(2):165-169.
doi: 10.1007/s11031-006-9001-5.

Approach/Avoidance Motivation, Message Framing, and Health Behavior: Understanding the Congruency Effect

Affiliations

Approach/Avoidance Motivation, Message Framing, and Health Behavior: Understanding the Congruency Effect

David K Sherman et al. Motiv Emot. 2006 Jun.

Abstract

Health messages framed to be congruent with individuals' approach/avoidance motivations have been found to be more effective in promoting health behaviors than health messages incongruent with approach/avoidance motivations. This study examines the processes underlying this congruency effect. Participants (undergraduate students, N = 67) completed a measure of approach/avoidance orientation (the BIS/BAS scales) and read either a gain- or loss-framed message promoting dental flossing. Results demonstrated a congruency effect: Participants who read a congruently framed message had greater flossing efficacy, intended to floss more, and used more dental flosses than did the participants who read an incongruent message. Moreover, intention to perform the behavior predicted the congruency effect and self-efficacy mediated participants' intentions to perform the health behavior. Discussion centers on the role of personality factors and situational factors in models of behavior change.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The effect of message framing and approach/avoidance orientation on flossing behavior
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Path model showing efficacy and intention as predictors of the effect of approach/avoidance orientation and message frame on flossing behavior. *p < .05. **p < .01

References

    1. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991;50:179–211.
    1. Bandura Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory. Psychology and Health. 1998;13:623–649.
    1. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986;51:1173–1182. - PubMed
    1. Carver CS, Sutton SK, Scheier MF. Action, emotion, and personality: Emerging conceptual integration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2000;26:741–751.
    1. Carver CS, White TL. Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1994;67:319–333.

LinkOut - more resources