Sorry for being too deep—The reason why reading is a session experience
My articles are voluminous, some are long, and above all, the content is deep.
I am often told that they are "too deep."
Honestly, it would be nice if I could write in a catchy way, like splashing around in the shallows.
But once I notice something, I can't help but want to convey it.
That is why my articles dive down into the deep sea.
Sorry about that.
I really mean it (laughs).
Why it is deep (just a quick reason)
People often think, "Aren't you just writing in a difficult way by intuition?"
That is not the case. On the contrary, I am translating and delivering it in an easy-to-understand way.
And because I write them quickly in as little as 10 minutes, I can write articles at lightning speed.
Even so, there is a reason why they become deep.
1️⃣ Design where article = session
The text in withchat is written using the same process as a session.
Pose a question (trigger a "movement" within you)
Unravel sensations (touch upon bodily sensations rather than thoughts)
Show the structure (make your own "why" visible)
Put into words (make them usable from tomorrow)
The reason why an "aftertaste remains / questions continue" after reading is because you are following this path.
Because I write with the goal of internal change rather than providing information, a certain "depth" inevitably emerges.
2️⃣ Translating with the "dual wheels" of immersion and barriers
I possess both a constitution that can immerse itself (thin boundaries) and a constitution that can draw lines with others (thick boundaries) at the same time.
Can dive into the other person's world as if it were my own (immersion)
Can translate calmly without getting swept away (barrier)
Because I can maintain this contradiction simultaneously, both my writing and my sessions become things that are "deep yet readable / capable of change."
💡 Related article
Too sensitive? No, it's a talent—The rare structure of immersion and barriers👇
The reason why it doesn't hit home immediately
My writing is designed not to "strike you the moment you read it," but rather to “resonate later.”
Shallow "easy-to-understand encouragement" provides temporary comfort, but it doesn't rewrite the blueprint of your life.
withchat articles aim to touch your unconscious wiring and rebuild the foundation of your words.
That is why it takes effect with a time lag.
It is designed so that when the reader is ready, a light will suddenly shine through, making you think, "Oh, this is about me."
Reader feedback (excerpts)
“Even after I finished reading, the questions remained, and the next morning, the answer just came to me.”
“My ‘pre-verbal sensations’ were finally put into words for the first time.”
“It didn't feel like encouragement, but rather like being given a ‘handrail for my structure.’”
💡Related articles (examples)👇
Sorry for being deep, but—that is why I can be of help
I want to provide not "ease of understanding," but a **“catalyst for change.”**
I don't want to write articles that make you feel comfortable in the shallows; I want to write articles that change who you are starting tomorrow.
That is precisely why I choose depth.
"Sorry for being too deep" is not my excuse; it is my design philosophy.
This is not a place to be comforted in the shallows, but
a place where your words are reborn..
Welcome to withchat♡
▶The sense of discomfort from being told "Aren't you overthinking it?"
🪞This is a place to clarify your judgment, rather than to seek correctness.
If, after finishing reading, you feel "something has moved" rather than "I understand."
That is a sign that the "assumptions" within you have begun to shake.
What we handle at withchat is the "assumption structure" that dulls your decision-making.
We do not deal in encouragement or know-how.
This is time for you to stand in a position from which you will never return.
If this feeling rings a bell, I recommend starting from here.