SYSTEM NOTICE

Auto translation by AI. Be sure, accuracy, nuances and authorial intent may not be fully reflected.
見出し画像

The Day I Decided 'Not to Cry Together.' How Cold Logic Can Become Someone's Lifeline

Introduction: The Support Worker Called Cold

'66% Intake Conversion Rate,' 'Scientific Sales,' 'Reproducible Support'

Recently, when I share these things on note or X, I sometimes receive comments like these: 'You're so focused on efficiency, it feels a bit cold.' 'Isn't welfare supposed to be about being closer to people's hearts?'

That is true. Welfare is a job that involves being close to people's hearts. It is a job that touches human pain and supports lives. However, that is precisely why I impose one rule on myself when I open the door to the interview room.

'I will never cry together with the client.'

This time, I am not talking about know-how. I will explain the reason why I came to pick up the cold scalpel of 'logic' instead of the warm blanket of 'empathy,' structured from three perspectives.

This is a story of a weak and fragile support worker who arrived at a 'survival strategy' in order to stay alive.

1. The Limits of Empathy: The Futility of 'Drowning Together'

I once believed that 'empathy is everything in support.' If a client said they were 'in pain,' my heart would tighten, and I would take their hand and say, 'I understand.' Seeing the client shed tears, I would cry along with them.

However, one day, I realized a cruel fact. No matter how much I cried with them, the client's reality did not change by even a millimeter.

Once they left the interview room, they would again face the cold reality of 'no money,' 'cannot sleep,' and 'nowhere to go.' My tears might have served as a temporary painkiller, but they were not the surgery needed to solve the problem.

Is the person who is drowning looking for someone to jump into the ocean and hug them? No. What they are truly looking for is someone who can calmly throw a rope from the shore, in the shortest distance possible.

2. The Expert's Frame: 'Factorization' as Kindness

Since then, I have changed my style. I decided to adopt the frame of an 'expert' (professional) who solves problems, rather than just a 'kind person.'

Imagine a skilled surgeon. What if a doctor started crying along with a patient who was in pain on the operating table, saying, 'It hurts, doesn't it? You poor thing'? The patient would despair. They would surely think, 'Don't cry, just fix it quickly.'

We support workers are the same. In my intake process, I thoroughly perform 'Structural Analysis' of the issues.

To a client who says, 'I feel like I'm going to be crushed by anxiety,' I calmly reply: 'Let's break down that anxiety. What percentage is financial anxiety, what percentage is health anxiety, and what percentage is relationship anxiety?'

It might sound cold at first glance. However, the moment you cut the monster of unknown 'anxiety' into concrete 'issues' like 'rent,' 'lack of sleep,' and 'conflict with parents,' light returns to the client's eyes.

'Oh, if it's like this, maybe I can solve them one by one.'

Cutting through the invisible fog of emotion with the technique of logic and making it a manageable size. I believe this 'structuring' is the greatest kindness I can provide.

3. Logic as a survival strategy: I build structures because I am 'weak'

I may sound arrogant, but in reality, I am not mentally strong myself. Quite the opposite. I have a past experience of taking a long-term leave due to mental health issues. I am easily swept away by waves of emotion, and if left alone, I am someone with a 'tofu-like' mentality who can easily lose sight of myself.

That is precisely why I needed 'logic'.

The reason I am particular about logic and structure is not because I am a genius. It is because I am a 'weak human' who is easily swayed by emotions. If I let my guard down, I tend to empathize too much, take on all of the other person's pain, and end up collapsing myself (empathy fatigue). To prevent this, I thoroughly systematize my work methods and fill the gaps where emotions might enter with 'structure'.

For me, 'scientific sales' and 'logic' are not weapons to attack others. They are desperate 'breakwaters (lifelines)' to protect both myself and the service users in front of me.

4. Conclusion: The deepest love is not crying together

If you, the reader of this article, are exhausted in the field of interpersonal support. If you are grinding down your own heart, thinking, 'I must be more supportive.'

Please, use 'logic' to protect yourself. Do not be afraid of becoming cold.

The deepest love is not crying together. It is calmly pointing out the 'route for you to survive'.

I will continue not to cry in the interview room. Instead, I am ready to be happier than anyone else on the day you overcome your difficulties and graduate with a smile.

For the sake of that day, I will continue to polish my cold logic today as well.


(Postscript: Regarding the contest) 'Well-being time' for me. It is the moment when I can be useful to someone as a professional within a 'system' I designed myself, without fearing bugs in my brain. You don't have to erase your weaknesses. You just have to love through systems. When I realized that, my life became rich.


(Author Profile)
Welfare Growth Architect
Background: Mental Health Social Worker / Certified Social Worker. Former sales representative at a specialized science trading company (13 years) x Current welfare company headquarters manager.
Achievements: Intake conversion rate 66% (2-3 times the industry average), LTV (retention rate) 1.5 times. Achieved full capacity within 5 months of opening.
Style: Believing in 'not creating manuals,' I provide unique support that fuses clinical dialogue with scientific sales. As a Neuro-Strategic Advisor, I design 'true survival strategies' for individuals and organizations. I also post useful information daily on X. I would be happy if you could follow me.👇


いいなと思ったら応援しよう!