SYSTEM NOTICE

Auto translation by AI. Be sure, accuracy, nuances and authorial intent may not be fully reflected.
見出し画像

What are the compatible patterns? Illustrating 'Subjective Type x Objective Type' (Part 1)

Last time, I summarized how my husband and I have different ways of 'perceiving the world' ↓

Roughly speaking,

Husband Objective perspective = Inhabitant of a blockchain-like world
Wife Subjective perspective = Inhabitant of a movie-like world

This time, I've delved into the previous content and illustrated the compatibility between subjective and objective types.



◯ For subjective types, 'overlapping fields of view' are important

Last time, I described subjective types as being in a movie screen world. Seen from above, it looks like a searchlight. If we define searchlight = field of view,

When fields of view overlap, you see the same world. (Left diagram)
When they don't overlap, you cannot see each other's worlds (Right diagram).

It's hard to understand each other when you have different ideas, but when you have the same ideas, you hit it off incredibly well...! This feels right for the subjective type's sense of things.

I feel that the more subjective a person is, the stronger the bond that is formed, or the more likely they are to remain on parallel lines.

I've come to interpret relationships where I previously thought 'no matter how much we talk, it doesn't get through...' as 'our fields of view just weren't overlapping.'

I am a subjective type, so this was my perspective, but it seems objective types have a different sense of things



● For objective types, 'number of people/distance' is important

I described objective types as being in a blockchain-like world, but basically, they are in a world where they see everyone from above.

From here on, these are stories I've heard from objective types around me; objective types seem to have particularly good compatibility with each other at work (Left diagram).

Since they are both people who can see everyone's movements, I could see the trust between them, with comments like 'It's easy to work when there's an objective type around' and 'Because they can see the whole picture, I feel like this person is reliable.'


Conversely, if they are together one-on-one too much, they tend to get exhausted trying to read each other, wondering 'How will they move?' (Right diagram).

Objective types decide their movements and positions based on others (previous article), but they say that when there are few people to base those decisions on, they get lost on how to move.

They seem to feel more comfortable in groups, saying things like, 'When it's one-on-one, I'm always checking how the other person is doing,' or 'Group LINE is easier because the attention is dispersed compared to individual LINE.'



Summary

[Subjective Type: Overlapping perspectives are important]
 ◎ When it works well: Perspectives overlap
 △ When it doesn't work well: Perspectives do not overlap

[Objective Type: Number of people and distance are important]
 
◎ When it works well: Doing something as a team
 △ When it doesn't work well: Staying one-on-one

In the second part, I will summarize the 'compatibility between Subjective and Objective types'.

As a Subjective type, I was surprised to find that the Objective type's perspective was completely different from mine...! It was interesting to hear the unique perspective of Objective types who can see the whole picture.

Although I interviewed Objective types, this article is still entirely from a Subjective perspective.
I would be happy if you could let me know if you notice anything.

Thank you to everyone who commented last time 😄🙏
It was very helpful and I was able to use it for this article and the next one.


That is all.
Thank you for reading until the end 😄


いいなと思ったら応援しよう!

この記事が参加している募集