Implementation Theory of Degrowth (9): Start Small and Change the World—Strategies for Introducing a Design-Based Economy into Reality
Note:
(The following series is a compilation of a series of dialogues with ChatGPT.
For details of the dialogues, please refer to the links on the original site.)
Original site (PC viewing recommended):
Previous article:
Part 9: Start Small and Change the World
—Strategies for introducing a design-based economy into reality
The biggest obstacle is not 'theory'
Many of you who have read this far may be feeling this way.
I understand the logic.
I agree with the direction.
But can it actually be done?
That feeling is correct.
The biggest barrier to a design-based economy is not
the immaturity of the theory.
The biggest wall is
consensus building and the implementation process
itself.
Why 'sound arguments' do not prevail
Looking back at history,
the abolition of slavery
Universal suffrage
Labor hour regulations
Pollution control
were all
criticized as "unrealistic" or "economically destructive"
.
What is important is
the fact that arguments inconvenient to the existing system always appear "unrealistic"
.
Do not try to change everything at once
A design-based economy looks very radical with its
abandonment of growthism
redefinition of currency
internalization of external costs
.
That is precisely why
not introducing it all at once
is critically important.
The core of the strategy: "Start small, grow big"
What is effective here is
the same mindset as software development.
MVP (Minimum Viable Product)
Sandbox
Phased release
Economic systems are also
a type of massive social software
reimagined as such.
What is an experimental institutional sandbox?
An "experimental institutional sandbox" is a framework for
not breaking existing systems,
within a limited scope,
explicitly as an "experiment"
to operate new rules.
The features are as follows:
Participation is voluntary
Failure is permitted
Data is made public
Introduction Step 1: Start with non-monetary indicators
The first thing to touch is
not currency
What to introduce first is
environmental scores
recirculation scores
regional circulation indicators
and other evaluation metrics.
At this stage,
do not change market prices
do not change the tax system
do not establish penalties
Strictly speaking,
limit it to visualization only
.
Introduction Step 2: Connection with Public Allocation
The next step is
connecting with non-market incentives
.
For example,
subsidy allocation
Public procurement
Research funding
Municipal evaluation
will partially reflect the
recirculation score.
What is important here as well is
not to destroy market competition
.
Implementation Step 3: Limited Assignment of Exchange Value
Once the system has stabilized,
tax refunds
fee reductions
preferential public services
and other forms,
pseudo-exchange value
will begin to be assigned.
Only then will it begin to function
as an economic incentive
.
Realistic responses to vested interests
The greatest backlash will come from
those who benefit from the current system
.
However, what is important is
a design that does not make them enemies
.
avoid creating sudden losses
establish a transition period
reward companies that adapt
We are breaking the 'winner-takes-all' model, not
needing to 'destroy existing companies'.
A strategy that does not put 'degrowth' at the forefront
There is a politically very important point.
Do not advocate for 'degrowth' from the start
is the strategy.
The words to use instead are
stabilization
resilience
risk management
sustainability
In fact,
growth-ism is too high-risk
is a much easier explanation to reach a consensus on.
The Path to Global Consensus
Global consensus does not arise from
ideology → consensus
The order is reversed.
The order is reversed.
common metrics
comparable data
accumulation of success stories
practical collaboration
political consensus
The strength of a design-based economy lies in the
ability to cross-compare the same model
point.
Expanding the CBAM-like Concept
What is important here is
Border Adjustment (CBAM-style design)
.
No disadvantage even with unilateral introduction
Preventing free-riding from the outside
Gradually increasing participating countries
A design-based economy is a
model that expands through connection rather than exclusion
.
Public opinion is born from "possibility of participation"
Finally, the most important point.
People do not move based on
theory
mathematical formulas
ideals
.
They move based on whether they can get involved
.
Visualization
Simulation
Alternative Proposals
Voting and Feedback
When these are in place,
democracy will return to the economy
.
Next Episode Preview (Final Episode)
It is finally the last episode.
Part 10: The Choice to Redesign the Economy—Toward an OS Update for Civilization
Why Now?
What to Choose and What to Let Go
The Future This Vision Opens
—we will summarize these points.
> Next Article:
▶︎ Related Series Structure
Implementation Theory of Degrowth (6-3): How Systems Work—How Coarse Weighting Changes the Economy
Implementation Theory of Degrowth (9): Start Small and Change the World—Strategies for Introducing a Design-Based Economy into Reality --- This article
> Original Site (PC viewing recommended):
> Previous Page:
> Top Page:
> Overall Top:
Finally...
If you liked this article, please share it widely using the share buttons below! Let's realize a "quiet revolution" together.
▼ A call for a "quiet revolution":
