SYSTEM NOTICE

Auto translation by AI. Be sure, accuracy, nuances and authorial intent may not be fully reflected.
見出し画像

Implementation Theory of Degrowth (9): Start Small and Change the World—Strategies for Introducing a Design-Based Economy into Reality


Note:

  • (The following series is a compilation of a series of dialogues with ChatGPT.
    For details of the dialogues, please refer to the links on the original site.)

Original site (PC viewing recommended):

Previous article:





Part 9: Start Small and Change the World

—Strategies for introducing a design-based economy into reality


The biggest obstacle is not 'theory'

Many of you who have read this far may be feeling this way.

I understand the logic.
I agree with the direction.
But can it actually be done?

That feeling is correct.

The biggest barrier to a design-based economy is not
the immaturity of the theory.

The biggest wall is

consensus building and the implementation process

itself.



Why 'sound arguments' do not prevail

Looking back at history,

  • the abolition of slavery

  • Universal suffrage

  • Labor hour regulations

  • Pollution control

were all

criticized as "unrealistic" or "economically destructive"

.

What is important is

the fact that arguments inconvenient to the existing system always appear "unrealistic"

.



Do not try to change everything at once

A design-based economy looks very radical with its

  • abandonment of growthism

  • redefinition of currency

  • internalization of external costs

.

That is precisely why

not introducing it all at once

is critically important.



The core of the strategy: "Start small, grow big"

What is effective here is
the same mindset as software development.

  • MVP (Minimum Viable Product)

  • Sandbox

  • Phased release

Economic systems are also

a type of massive social software

reimagined as such.



What is an experimental institutional sandbox?

An "experimental institutional sandbox" is a framework for

  • not breaking existing systems,

  • within a limited scope,

  • explicitly as an "experiment"

to operate new rules.

The features are as follows:

  • Participation is voluntary

  • Failure is permitted

  • Data is made public


Introduction Step 1: Start with non-monetary indicators

The first thing to touch is

not currency

What to introduce first is

  • environmental scores

  • recirculation scores

  • regional circulation indicators

and other evaluation metrics.

At this stage,

  • do not change market prices

  • do not change the tax system

  • do not establish penalties

Strictly speaking,

limit it to visualization only

.


Introduction Step 2: Connection with Public Allocation

The next step is

connecting with non-market incentives

.

For example,

  • subsidy allocation

  • Public procurement

  • Research funding

  • Municipal evaluation

will partially reflect the
recirculation score.

What is important here as well is

not to destroy market competition

.


Implementation Step 3: Limited Assignment of Exchange Value

Once the system has stabilized,

  • tax refunds

  • fee reductions

  • preferential public services

and other forms,

pseudo-exchange value

will begin to be assigned.

Only then will it begin to function

as an economic incentive

.



Realistic responses to vested interests

The greatest backlash will come from

those who benefit from the current system

.

However, what is important is

a design that does not make them enemies

.

  • avoid creating sudden losses

  • establish a transition period

  • reward companies that adapt

We are breaking the 'winner-takes-all' model, not
needing to 'destroy existing companies'.



A strategy that does not put 'degrowth' at the forefront

There is a politically very important point.

Do not advocate for 'degrowth' from the start

is the strategy.

The words to use instead are

  • stabilization

  • resilience

  • risk management

  • sustainability

In fact,

growth-ism is too high-risk

is a much easier explanation to reach a consensus on.



The Path to Global Consensus

Global consensus does not arise from

ideology → consensus

The order is reversed.

The order is reversed.

  1. common metrics

  2. comparable data

  3. accumulation of success stories

  4. practical collaboration

  5. political consensus

The strength of a design-based economy lies in the

ability to cross-compare the same model

point.



Expanding the CBAM-like Concept

What is important here is

Border Adjustment (CBAM-style design)

.

  • No disadvantage even with unilateral introduction

  • Preventing free-riding from the outside

  • Gradually increasing participating countries

A design-based economy is a

model that expands through connection rather than exclusion

.



Public opinion is born from "possibility of participation"

Finally, the most important point.

People do not move based on

  • theory

  • mathematical formulas

  • ideals

.

They move based on whether they can get involved

.

  • Visualization

  • Simulation

  • Alternative Proposals

  • Voting and Feedback

When these are in place,

democracy will return to the economy

.



Next Episode Preview (Final Episode)

It is finally the last episode.

Part 10: The Choice to Redesign the Economy—Toward an OS Update for Civilization

  • Why Now?

  • What to Choose and What to Let Go

  • The Future This Vision Opens

—we will summarize these points.


> Next Article:



▶︎ Related Series Structure



> Original Site (PC viewing recommended):


> Previous Page:


> Top Page:


> Overall Top:


Finally...

If you liked this article, please share it widely using the share buttons below! Let's realize a "quiet revolution" together.

▼ A call for a "quiet revolution":


いいなと思ったら応援しよう!