SYSTEM NOTICE

Auto translation by AI. Be sure, accuracy, nuances and authorial intent may not be fully reflected.
見出し画像

The bankruptcy of Zentoshin has brought the 'cash flow risk' hidden behind a cashless society to the surface


Zentoshin, which provided early payment services for credit card transactions, received an order to commence bankruptcy proceedings from the Osaka District Court on July 6, 2026.

According to Teikoku Databank, the company's liabilities totaled 125.929 billion yen. This is a significant scale for a 2026 bankruptcy, and its impact is too great to be dismissed as merely the failure of a single company.

What is important about this case is that Zentoshin was not just a simple payment processing company.

The company provided a service that allowed businesses such as restaurants to cash out their credit card sales early, before the funds were officially deposited by the credit card companies.

In other words, from the perspective of a restaurant, they were a presence that bridged the gap of 'waiting for credit card payment deposits'.

Restaurants do not always receive cash immediately even when sales are made.

In the case of credit card payments, it can take anywhere from several days to several weeks, or even longer depending on the contract, until the actual deposit is made.

On the other hand, payments on the restaurant side do not wait.

Purchasing ingredients.
Payments to liquor suppliers.
Labor costs.
Rent.
Utility bills.
Lease payments.

These occur on a daily basis.

There are sales.
But there is no cash on hand.

It was early payment services like Zentoshin's that bridged this gap.

From the store's perspective, cashless payment is 'deferred payment of sales'

From the user's perspective, cashless payment is convenient.

You don't have to carry cash.
It's easy to make large payments.
You earn points.
It's easy to accommodate inbound tourists.

However, from the store's perspective, the structure is a bit different.

With credit card payments, sales are not immediately converted into cash.

In a cash-based business, sales remain on hand right on the spot.

However, with credit card payments, even if a sale is recorded in the payment data, there is a time lag until it enters the store's account.

For companies with sufficient financial resources, this time lag can be absorbed.

However, for small restaurants and nightlife establishments that operate on day-to-day cash flow, this delay of a few days to a few weeks is a heavy burden.

That is precisely why there was demand for early payment services.

Even if interest rates and fees were somewhat high, there was value in receiving cash immediately.

Zentoshin's business cannot function if funding stops.

The weakness of this business model is that it requires advance funding.

Money is given to member stores first.
Payments from credit card companies are received later.
The funds for that interim period must be procured from somewhere.

Considering that much of that funding relied on borrowing from financial institutions, the structure is quite delicate.

Card sales at member stores are stable.
Payments from credit card companies arrive as scheduled.
Funding can be procured from financial institutions.

If these three conditions are met, it works.

However, if any part of it collapses, things become difficult all at once.

Restaurant sales decline.
Credit risk of business partners is called into question.
Financial institutions change their lending stance.
Advance funds run short.

When this happens, the early payment service stops.

This model looks like a payment service on the surface, but in reality, it was also a cash flow support business as well.

Therefore, the impact when it collapses does not end with a mere suspension of payments.

The impact on restaurants is uncollected sales and worsening cash flow.

The first to be affected are the restaurants that were using Zentoshin's service.

The Japan Food Service Association has also issued a warning regarding restaurants using the company's service, noting the possibility that it will be difficult to recover sales proceeds that have not been deposited despite the credit card payments having been processed.

This is quite tough.

From the store's perspective, the service has already been provided.

Food was served.
Drinks were served.
Labor costs were incurred.
Purchasing has already been completed.

Yet, there is a possibility that the revenue from card payments will not be received.

Rather than revenue disappearing, it is closer to 'the working capital that was supposed to come in disappearing'.

This is particularly difficult if it happens at the end of the month, before payday, or before payments for supplies are due.

For stores without a buffer in their cash flow, this could lead to delays in payments to suppliers, delays in employee salaries, and delays in rent payments.

In other words, the bankruptcy of Zento-shin will not only cause losses for restaurants but will also ripple out to their business partners.

The impact on nightlife establishments is even greater

Nightlife establishments are seen as being particularly affected by this incident.

Clubs, lounges, cabaret clubs, and host clubs have high average spending per customer, and the ratio of card payments tends to be high.

It is difficult to make high-value purchases with cash alone.
Additional orders are made because cards can be used.
The hurdle for visiting is lowered because cards can be used.

This is the structure.

If card payments cannot be used, or if deposits after payment become unstable, it will affect sales themselves.

From the customer's perspective, it is also difficult to go to a store where cards cannot be used.

Especially in business formats where high-value payments are a prerequisite, cashless support is not just a convenience, but a prerequisite for generating sales.

Therefore, this bankruptcy leads not only to the 'risk of non-payment' but also to the 'loss of future sales opportunities'.

Impact on existing restaurant companies

For existing restaurant companies, this incident forces a review of cash management.

Small chains and individual stores in particular will likely become quite cautious from now on.

The first is the credit risk of payment service providers.

Until now, many stores have viewed credit card companies and payment service providers as 'infrastructure'.

However, this incident has brought to light the risk that the payment service provider itself could go bankrupt.

Moving forward, it will become necessary to look at points such as which payment company is being used, what the payment cycle is, who the contracting party is, and whether funds are being managed separately.

The second point is a review of reliance on payment deposits.

Stores that rely heavily on card payments for their sales and structure their cash flow based on early payment services are at risk.

Even though cashless sales are growing, cash on hand is thin.

This state is convenient in normal times, but it can cause a sudden bottleneck during a crisis.

The third point is securing multiple payment routes.

If you concentrate your payment processing with a single company, your business itself becomes vulnerable if that company stops operating.

In the future, there may be a move toward diversifying major card payments, QR payments, cash, and separate payment processing services.

Ripple effects on suppliers, liquor stores, and staffing agencies

When the cash flow of restaurants deteriorates, the impact spreads to their suppliers.

Liquor stores.
Food wholesalers.
Meat, fresh fish, and produce vendors.
Cleaning companies.
Linen supply services.
Staffing agencies.
Store equipment companies.

If restaurants delay payments, it also affects the collection of accounts receivable for these businesses.

In particular, community-based liquor stores and food wholesalers may have a high ratio of transactions with restaurants.

If payment delays at some stores trigger a chain reaction, the cash flow of the suppliers will also deteriorate.

In other words, the bankruptcy of Zentoshin is not just a 'restaurant industry problem'.

It has the potential to affect the entire regional commercial flow centered around restaurants.

Impact on financial institutions

The impact on financial institutions cannot be ignored either.

Shimane Bank has announced that there is a risk that its 800 million yen loan to Zentoshin may become uncollectible or delayed.

Looking only at the figure of 800 million yen, it may not be fatal for major banks.

However, it is not a light matter for regional banks.

Regional banks are already facing problems such as a shrinking regional economy, a difficult profit environment, and limits on borrowers.

When concerns about large-scale bad debts like this arise, credit management becomes even more cautious.

One possible impact is the tightening of lending stances toward payment processing companies and factoring-like businesses.

Early payment services.
Purchase of accounts receivable.
Advance payment of card sales.
Companies dealing with gray-area businesses.

Screening for these areas may become stricter.

As a result, the cost of financing for similar industries and business models will rise.

Ultimately, this will lead to higher fees for restaurants and a reduction in early payment services.

Impact on payment processing companies

For payment processing companies, this incident is also quite significant.

From now on, merchants will no longer choose providers based solely on 'low fees' or 'fast deposits'.

Rather, the following points will be emphasized.

Is the fund management transparent?
Is the source of funds for deposits stable?
Is the relationship with financial institutions sound?
Is merchant screening appropriate?
How are anti-social, illegal, and gray-area businesses handled?
How is the risk of non-payment handled in an emergency?

Payment processing companies will be viewed not just as convenient service providers, but as credit infrastructure.

As a result, this could be a tailwind for large, well-capitalized companies.

On the other hand, small and medium-sized payment processing companies and cash flow support services will face difficulties if they cannot prove their creditworthiness.

There is also a possibility that industry consolidation will progress.

There are also tailwinds for existing major payment, POS, and accounting services

This incident could also be a business opportunity for existing major payment companies, POS register companies, and accounting software companies.

Restaurants will think as follows from now on.

I want to make payments secure.
I want to accurately track expected deposits.
I want to manage sales and deposits in one place.
I want to automatically create cash flow statements.
I want to see the risk of non-payment for each payment company.

In other words, demand is growing for services that allow for the integrated management of payments, accounting, and cash flow, rather than just simple payment terminals.

Companies that can provide POS registers, accounting software, cashless payment services, bank account integration, and cash flow management as a single package will become stronger.

Restaurant owners need to look at 'deposits' and 'cash balances' more than 'sales' now more than ever.

This will be a tailwind for companies that can address these needs.

Impact on the cashless society itself

I do not think this incident will lead to a sudden return to cash.

Cashless payment is already well-established in society.

Consumers are also accustomed to the convenience.
Inbound tourists also demand card payments.
Card usage tends to be a prerequisite for high-value transactions.

Therefore, returning to a cash-only world is not realistic.

However, the burdens hidden behind cashless payments will be re-examined.

Who bears the transaction fees?
Who absorbs the gap in deposit cycles?
Who carries the risk of early deposits?
When a payment processing company goes bankrupt, how are the merchant's sales protected?

This issue has now come to the surface.

Until now, the convenience visible to consumers has been at the forefront.

However, from the store's perspective, cashless payment is also a system that comes with fees and delayed deposits.

How to share this burden.

This will be a challenge moving forward.

Issues of regulation and oversight will also emerge

This incident may also spark debate regarding regulation.

A particular point of concern is how the sales proceeds of merchants were being managed.

Were the funds of the payment processing company and the sales proceeds to be passed on to merchants managed separately and clearly?
To what extent are merchants protected in the event of non-payment?
To what extent should early payment services be regulated as financial services?
How should credit be managed for operators that handle gray-area merchants?

These are the issues that arise.

If we are to expand cashless payments as social infrastructure, simply increasing the adoption rate is not enough.

We must also establish proper fund management, credit management, and merchant protection behind the payments.

The essence of this incident is that 'someone was bearing the risk behind convenient services'.

Cashless payment is convenient.

Early payment services are also appreciated by restaurants.

However, that convenience is not free.

Someone is paying the fees.
Someone is providing the advance funds.
Someone is bearing the credit risk.
Someone is holding the risk of uncollectible debt.

This time, that risk surfaced all at once.

Restaurants saw the risk of not receiving funds despite having sales.

Financial institutions saw the risk of lending to payment processing companies.

The payment industry saw the importance of creditworthiness and fund management.

Consumers saw that being able to use cards is not a given.

What restaurants should do now

What restaurants should learn from this incident is clear.

Look at the deposits, not just the sales.

Just because you have card sales does not mean you are safe.

When will the funds be deposited?
Which payment company is the money coming from?
How much is currently unpaid?
How many days can you survive if a payment delay occurs?
Are you relying on only one company?

It is necessary to confirm these points.

Also, when choosing a payment company, it is better not to judge solely by fees and deposit speed.

Fast deposits come with their own costs and risks.

From now on, it is necessary to look at the creditworthiness of payment companies, their fund management systems, contract details, and how they handle situations in the event of an emergency.

The bankruptcy of Zentoshin revealed the 'shadow costs' of a cashless society.

This bankruptcy is not just a problem for Zentoshin.

Cash flow for restaurants.
High-value payments at nightlife establishments.
Credit management by regional banks.
Creditworthiness of payment processing companies.
Payments to suppliers.
Sustainability of a cashless society.

It showed that all of these were connected.

Cashless is convenient.

However, behind that convenience lie deposit cycles, fees, advance funding, and credit risks.

If you use it without understanding this structure, it is possible to go bankrupt even while having sales.

In future restaurant management, the ability to increase sales alone will not be enough.

The ability to manage deposits.
The ability to read cash flow.
The ability to diversify payment risks.
The ability to assess the creditworthiness of business partners.

These areas will become more important.

The bankruptcy of Zentoshin may have been a warning for the cashless society to move to the next stage.

いいなと思ったら応援しよう!

この記事は noteマネー にピックアップされました

noteマネーのバナー