The Power of Art: Effects on Dementia and Caregivers
📖 Literature Information and Abstract Translation
Systematic review of arts and culture-based interventions for people living with dementia and their caregivers
📕Letrondo, Pilar A., et al. "Systematic review of arts and culture-based interventions for people living with dementia and their caregivers." Ageing Research Reviews (2022): 101793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2022.101793
🔗 DOI, PubMed, Google Scholar 🌲MORE⤴ >>> Connected Papers
※ What is Connected Papers? >>> note.
🔑 Key points
🔹30 out of 34 studies reported improvements in well-being.
🔹17 studies involved visits to museums or galleries.
🔹Only one study targeted patients with moderate to severe dementia.
[Background/Objective] To investigate and summarize studies examining the impact of arts and cultural interventions on people with dementia and their caregivers, specifically regarding the well-being and cognitive abilities of the person with dementia and the burden on the caregiver.
[Methods] A systematic search was conducted using five electronic databases (PubMed, PsychINFO, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library). Original research articles published in peer-reviewed journals, including both qualitative and quantitative studies, were included. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias tool. A narrative synthesis was performed for all included studies.
[Results] Out of 4,827 screened papers, 34 met the inclusion criteria. All 34 studies were categorized into five main intervention types.
✅ Five types of art interventions
① Museum/gallery interventions involving art-making activities (n = 9)
・This intervention refers to creating art within a museum or gallery setting.
・Conducted by museum or gallery educators or community artists.
・In two studies, these facilitators received dementia awareness training prior to the intervention.
② Museum/gallery interventions involving other activities (n = 8)
・This intervention refers to viewing or discussing art.
・Four studies included museum or gallery visits involving discussions about the art or artifacts viewed.
・Two studies included immersive reminiscence therapy as part of the museum visit, and storytelling activities combined with museum visits, respectively.
③ Art-making interventions (n = 6)
・This intervention refers to creating art in locations other than museums or galleries.
・Artist facilitators received training on dementia prior to the intervention.
・Conducted in dementia day care centers, long-term care facilities for people with dementia, university art departments, healthy aging cafes, etc.
④ Music-based interventions (n = 4)
・This intervention refers to various interventions through music.
・Three studies evaluated singing, and one evaluated music with movement.
・Provided by experienced musicians; one study was conducted by a music therapist.
⑤ Other interventions not fitting into the four categories (n = 7)
・Refers to art-related interventions other than ①-④ above.
・Heritage visits and programs, heritage-based activities, performance art, viewing dramatic performances, viewing various types of performances, theatrical activities, and creative storytelling activities.
・Provided by trained facilitators, professional actors or artists, or delivered by researchers.
Five RCTs showed improvements in well-being outcomes, but no cognitive improvements were seen, except for some subscales in music interventions. Most non-randomized studies reported improvements in cognitive function and well-being for both people with dementia and their caregivers. The study subjects were mainly people with mild to moderate dementia.
[Conclusion] Arts and cultural interventions may provide benefits to people with dementia and their caregivers. However, the heterogeneity in intervention methods and outcome measures hindered the generalization of results. Further research on arts and cultural interventions for people with dementia and their caregivers should utilize larger controlled trials, standardized outcome measures, and include people with moderate to severe dementia.
🌱 So What?: What did I find interesting?
First, I would like you to read the following passage (*This book is a gem. It is a must-read).
The meaning of life can be realized in three main directions. First, life can be made meaningful by
doing something, by acting or creating, by realizing one's work. Second, meaning can also be realized by
experiencing something, by loving nature, art, or people.
I notice that these art interventions (especially those involving creation) satisfy both of these. In other words, they might be interventions that powerfully support
realizing meaning in life. And the stronger one's sense of meaning or purpose in life, the lower the risk of dementia (📕Sutin, 2023 >>>
doi). I thought this might be the core mechanism by which art interventions activate cognitive function.
On the other hand, why do they improve caregiver well-being? In addition to the aforementioned 'realizing meaning in life,' I think there is also
relief from responsibility (a break). I feel this when I spend a holiday with my children; there is still 'fatigue' involved. Trying to understand someone you cannot fully understand, acting in a way that aligns with them, and the need to constantly monitor them to ensure safety is exhausting and drains mental energy. That is why, as reported in previously read literature, day services provide caregivers with a rest.
I believe art interventions have a similar effect.
Now, Frankl's initial words have a continuation.
Third, even if there is no possibility of making life valuable in either the first or second direction, one can still find meaning in life.Even if the fact that one's potential is constrained is an unavoidable fate, an inescapable and inevitable reality, one can find meaning in life through the attitude one takes toward that fact, how one adapts to it, how one behaves in response to it, and how one accepts that fate as a 'cross' imposed upon oneself.
How can one mentally face the disability of dementia while creating art, appreciating it, or discussing it?
If a new perspective can be found there, that person's life approaches something of value.
What invites one to that place is the splendor of the artwork, the realizations during the creative process, and the words from a third party.
As for my involvement as a physical therapist, it is the possibility of preparing that space and thinking through what constitutes the 'best words from a third party when confronting a disability.'.
First, let me expose myself to a bit more art; let's start there.
Art is one of the means of uniting people.
Tolstoy
⬇︎ Related note & posts on 𝕏✨
📕芸術の威力
— 理学療法士_海津陽一 Ph.D. (@copellist) December 13, 2022
・システマティックレビュー(n=34)
🔹芸術介入の5つのタイプを特定
🔹30件が幸福度の改善を報告した
🔹多くの研究で認知機能の改善を認めた
🔹17の研究では、博物館やギャラリーを訪問した
芸術制作や鑑賞、音楽。
場を用意する、推奨すること、検討してみます😲#芸術 #認知症 #介護者 pic.twitter.com/VP1vlP9tVH
○●━━━━━━━━━━━・・・‥ ‥ ‥ ‥
High-quality Rehabilitation Medicine-related English Paper Reading 'ARI'
From here♪
↓↓↓

‥ ‥ ‥ ‥・・・━━━━━━━━━━━●○
#️⃣ #PhysicalTherapy #ClinicalResearch #Research #Rehabilitation #EnglishPaper #LiteratureReading #EnglishLiteratureReading #Evidence #Science #DailyUpdate #RecentLearning
