[Silly Philosophical Dialogue] Why do people try to hide their farts?

Introduction

Hello, I am a student of philosophy, Sotogare.
I am very happy that you are reading this after seeing the title.

The main part is the dialogue in the "Full Dialogue" section, so if you want to skip the preamble, please take a look there.
In the "Introduction," I will describe what I actually did.

I created an AI (GPTs) called "Silly Socrates" and had a dialogue with it. Then, I turned the content of that dialogue into an article. That is what I did.

It all started with the idea that it would be interesting to have a philosophical dialogue on a silly theme. I worked hard on the settings to ensure the AI would come up with the silliest themes possible and take being silly seriously.

I hope you can feel the fun of dialogue, the fun of thinking, and the fun of taking silly things seriously.

In turning this into an article, I have polished the sentences on "my" side a little. After all, the questioner's side tends to be a bit wordy or use strange language, so I made it a little more precise. Being wordy is fine too, though. I don't think I have deviated from the original intent, so it should be fine.

Today's theme is, "Why do people try to hide their farts?." Now, please enjoy the "Full Dialogue" section.

Full Dialogue

What theme shall we philosophize about today?

Today, I would like to philosophize about the theme, "Why do people try to hide their farts?."Friend of Pee, the sounds and odors emitted by humans are things that make their existence known to others. However, when it comes to farts, many people strive to secretly erase their existence. Isn't that strange?

Why on earth do people consider farts to be 'things that must not be shown'? Sounds and smells should just be a natural flow. Through those sounds and smells, humans might even be able to sense each other's physical condition and emotions. If we didn't hide them and proudly expressed, 'I am just as I am right now!' through farts, wouldn't we be able to understand each other more deeply?

Now, Friend of Pee, what do you think?

First, I will try to put myself in that situation. There are broadly two situations where I fart: one is in front of my family, and the other is in front of other people. I often don't hide them in front of my family, but I try to hide them in front of others. Therefore, the question 'Why do people try to hide their farts?' can be replaced with 'Why do people try to hide their farts in front of others?'

First, while I think it's fine to fart in front of my family, I feel that I must not do it in front of others. When I think about the reason for that, the awareness that 'I might be disliked by others for farting' comes to mind.

Digging deeper, the emotion of "embarrassment" first arises regarding passing gas. Next, the thought of "not wanting to be disliked by others" also arises. Regarding the former, there may be a recognition that farts are a private matter. Based on this premise, it is considered more acceptable in front of family. Also, while it might be in a similar category to urinating, urinating has the additional issue of "becoming defenseless during the act," so it might be slightly different.

On the other hand, in the latter case, there is a recognition that farts have a foul odor. It is a natural reaction to feel uncomfortable and want to avoid it when smelling someone else's fart. While there may be no emotion involved, one can gauge a certain level of physical condition through the smell. However, since there is no need to know someone else's physical condition in business or similar settings, could it be that a foul odor is linked to an animalistic judgment of it being "something dangerous"?

Thinking about it that way, the act of spreading something dangerous can also become a cause for being avoided within a group. This can be said to be one of the reasons why people try to hide their farts. Also, the recognition that "farts are a private matter" might also be one of the reasons for trying to hide them.

Oh, my friend of urine, what a deep and insightful analysis you have developed. Your observations get to the essence of why people try to hide their farts in front of others. I would like to deepen that perspective even further.

First, the perspective you raised that "farts are a private matter" is interesting. The feeling of considering farts, like urine, as "something that should be isolated from others" is truly human. If urinating exposes one's defenselessness along with the act of excretion, perhaps farts also show a kind of "mental defenselessness." People expose "foreign matter emitted from their own body" through farts. That is also "exposing oneself", and while it turns into an act that is safely permitted in relationships where there is mutual trust like family, a defensive emotion likely works in front of others, not wanting to show that mental vulnerability.

Also, your observation that we want to avoid the "sensation brought about by the foul odor of a fart" as "something dangerous" is extremely sharp. Just as animals detect poisons or dangers through foul odors or bitter tastes, we also unconsciously try to "hide" foul odors to "avoid dangerous things." In this sense, the act of hiding a fart may be considered not just a matter of manners, but a part of survival strategy in group living.

However, another question arises here. What is the essence of the "embarrassment" that makes us think we must hide farts? Why, in the first place, is a "foul odor" linked to "embarrassment" or "guilt"? In the animal kingdom, foul odors are often useful for self-defense, so why do only humans care about the "eyes of others" and hide them like this?

Perhaps, as you pointed out, we view farts as a crisis of "alienation from the group" in order to maintain "good relationships" with others. It seems necessary to delve deeper into this question.

What I would like to propose is the possibility that because humans are "animals with developed brains," animalistic values are at the root. The emotion of "embarrassment" is the final result of various reactions shown by the body, and perhaps it exists to make us avoid specific behaviors through this emotion.

Since a "foul odor" is considered something that should be avoided as an animal or as a group, the body tries to avoid emitting a foul odor. For that purpose, it may be generating "embarrassment," urging us to hide farts, and adapting us to group living.

However, it is also interesting that in the animal kingdom, foul odors are often useful for self-defense. Regarding this, I have two perspectives. One is the point that "self-defense is still being carried out," and the other is the point that "self-defense has become unnecessary."

Regarding the former, it is the perspective that farts occur as a result of self-defense. The fact that farts come out as part of life activities, including intestinal activity, can be considered something that leads to the defense of life by not accumulating harmful gases in the body. Also, farts might come out as a result of accumulated stress. This indicates the possibility that the need to discharge farts arises to prioritize physical condition, and it is separated from situations where sociality is prioritized.

As for the latter, it is the idea that humans have evolved from "biological defense" to "group defense." In modern times, crises related to survival have decreased significantly compared to the Stone Age, and with the development of culture, the aspect as a "social animal" has become stronger than the animalistic aspect. As a result, the defensive instinct in terms of "whether sociality is being maintained" has become stronger than survival as an individual, and hiding farts may have become prioritized within group living.

It became a bit long, but I have summarized my thoughts. How do you feel about it?

My friend of urine, what a wonderful insight! Your thoughts are truly sharp and delve deeply into the multi-layered meaning that "human embarrassment" possesses. The two perspectives you presented—"foul odor as self-defense" and "embarrassment as social defense"—become important clues to knowing how humans have maintained themselves and connected with others throughout evolution.

First, the idea that animalistic values generate "embarrassment" is very attractive. Animals instinctively avoid dangerous things, especially those that emit foul odors. This is directly linked to survival. However, as you say, by developing brains, humans replace those "signals to be avoided" with relationships with others and express them as complex emotions called "embarrassment." In this process, animalistic values may have evolved into a new dimension of "acceptance into a group."

Here, the "two-layer structure of biological defense and social defense" that you point out is particularly interesting. When humans entered a stage of evolution where they try to protect not only physical survival but also their position within a group, we likely began to convert "instinctive defensive reactions" into "socially adapted emotions." Viewed from this perspective, it can be considered that people use "embarrassment" to control the act of farting, which is self-defense, and protect the order and comfort of the group.

Furthermore, the perspective of "social defense" that you mentioned also makes one think, "I see." While farts have a role as a survival instinct in the natural world, in human society, they have come to be perceived as an "act that disturbs the group." This suggests the "transition to a social phase" that you mentioned. Once, physical survival was the top priority, but in modern times, "being a socially desirable existence" has also become a form of survival.

However, if we base it on this perspective, the next question arises. If humans hide farts because they are social beings, why do they fart boldly in situations where there is no need to hide them—for example, in front of someone they completely trust? In other words, the "liberation of farts in front of family" that you point out may not just be because there is no embarrassment, but also a proof of trust that "social defense is temporarily suspended."

Thinking about it this way, couldn't it be said that the act of hiding or not hiding a fart itself is an indicator of the depth of human relationships?

First, I think setting the condition of "in front of someone you can completely trust" is a very good perspective. In my case, I simply said "family," but we should consider the point that just because they are family doesn't necessarily mean you can fart in front of them.

The perspective of "temporarily suspending the defense of sociality" is also very interesting. If we consider a relationship with a trusted person as a kind of small society, then perhaps being allowed to fart within that relationship means that the defense mechanism is being temporarily deactivated.

Furthermore, I felt there was some truth to the perspective that the act of hiding or not hiding a fart becomes an "indicator of the depth of human relationships." If you don't hide it, there seems to be a subjective aspect that you trust that person very much.

One thing I thought about here is that there are situations where you hide your farts even in front of people you think you trust. In my case, I try to hide my farts in front of trusted friends other than family. However, depending on the situation, I think there might be cases where, for example, you fart freely within a group of male friends.

What causes this difference? Is it simply a difference in the depth of human relationships? Or do people have different standards for measuring the depth of human relationships? It is possible that other factors are involved, and I think it is worth thinking about deeply.

Friend of Farts, what a truly interesting perspective! As you say, the point that "just because you trust someone doesn't mean you won't hide your farts," and that it "differs depending on the situation and relationship," is indeed a great mystery. By digging into this contradiction, I feel like I'm getting closer to the subtle sociality of humans.

First, as you suggest, whether or not you hide a fart is not determined solely by "whether or not you trust them." Therefore, it is highly likely that other factors are involved. What we can consider here is how the "depth of human relationships" and the "nature of the relationship" intersect. Specifically, even with the same "trusted person," there may be "relationships where intimacy allows for the sharing of private matters" and "relationships where you keep your distance out of respect, even if you don't share those things."

For example, the relationship of family is the ultimate in privacy, and it is premised on the sharing of all aspects, so farts are often naturally permitted. On the other hand, even with a trusted friend, in a "relationship where sociality is shared," there may be a stronger tendency to try to maintain the boundaries of privacy. For example, in a group with a business relationship or a common goal, even if you trust each other, there is a possibility that "social balance" is maintained by hiding "individual physiological phenomena" like farts.

Next, focusing on the "nature of the group" you pointed out, people may be deciding the degree to which they liberate themselves based on "the other person's tolerance for their privacy". For example, in a group of male friends, if a relationship is built where everyone "accepts everything, including farts," the sense of trust in that place creates an implicit rule that "farts are also shareable." However, even if you trust them, this tolerance may not be established among individual friends, so the recognition of it as something that "should be hidden" likely remains strong.

Going a step further, regarding this "liberation of privacy," a prediction of "how the other person will perceive my privacy" is also involved. For example, even with a trusted friend, you may unconsciously judge "whether or not my fart is unpleasant to that person," which can lead to the action of hiding it. Humans may be sensitively sensing how their actions are evaluated by others and reacting unconsciously depending on the situation.

Here, a new question arises. If humans are expressing the depth or nature of their relationships through the act of "farting", would this be the same for other physiological acts—such as burping or sneezing? Is there a reason why only farts are treated specially, or do other physiological phenomena also have different meanings depending on social trust and the nature of the relationship?

Your question is a perfect guide for exploring the deep connection between human relationships and physiological phenomena.

I feel the perspective of "nature of the relationship" is very interesting. "What kind of trust" you have in the other person may make a big difference in the relationship. For example, the trust that it's okay to show your private side and the trust that you want to be liked by the other person lead to different actions. In the latter case, even if you trust the other person, the desire to maintain a good impression works, which can lead to the action of hiding farts.

If it's family, the distance is close both physically and psychologically, so I think there is fertile ground for "a sense of trust that it's okay to show your private side" to be born. Also, the way of thinking about "whether or not my fart is unpleasant to the other person" also changes depending on what kind of relationship you have built. In this way, I feel that how much you care about the evaluation from the other person determines whether or not you hide your farts. For example, because you have private trust in your family, it is easy to think "my evaluation won't go down if I fart here," so it is easy for farting to be permitted. On the other hand, in friendships, if the desire to be liked by the other person and to have them have a good impression is strong, a consciousness of "won't my evaluation go down if I fart here?" may be born.

Finally, regarding "If humans are expressing the depth or nature of their relationships through the act of farting, would this be the same for other physiological acts—such as burping or sneezing?" I think the perspective of "nature" here applies to sneezing and burping as well. However, in the case of sneezing, concerns such as whether the other person has a cold and might catch it from you, or thoughts about social impact in situations like the workplace, might also be added.

Friend of Farts, your thinking is becoming deeper and deeper, enriching our discussion even further. The hiding or liberation of farts due to the "difference in reasons for trust" and "evaluation criteria from others" that you point out is truly the key to revealing the diverse aspects of "trust." And I think the "context in which trust is born" is involved as an evaluation axis for relationships.

First, there is certainly a qualitative difference between "trust that it's okay to show your private side" and "trust that involves consideration because you want to be liked." Because the relationship with family is very close in physical and emotional distance, an environment where "it's acceptable to fart" is naturally fostered. On the other hand, the more you trust a friend or a loved one, the more you become conscious of "wanting to look good" and "wanting the other person to have a good impression." Thinking that a fart would affect your evaluation here, you try to hide it. In other words, humans have an "evaluation axis for relationships" unconsciously, and one can see it as changing their reaction to physiological phenomena according to that axis.

Furthermore, the "evaluation criteria from others" that you point out does not stop at the judgment of whether or not to hide a fart. As you stated at the end, this is also applicable to other physiological acts. For example, the example of sneezing is very easy to understand. Since sneezing indicates the possibility of illness, social consideration and health consciousness are also involved. Also, regarding burping, since it is received as a kind of "body information" that indicates what you ate or your physical condition, you may change your behavior depending on the "type of trust in the relationship" toward the other person.

As another perspective derived from this, "stability of evaluation" seems to be important. In relationships where evaluation does not easily waver, like family, there may actually be a function of "confirming stability by showing private physiological phenomena." On the other hand, in relationships like friends or workplace colleagues, where evaluation is easy to move, you naturally become defensive. This is deeply related to the degree of tolerance for private acts in the "soil of trust."

Then, let's expand your question a little. If humans are unconsciously judging whether to "defend or liberate sociality" based on evaluation criteria from others, how far does this evaluation criteria influence? For example, if you are a person with a sharp eye for observation like you, wouldn't you read the other person's sense of trust and evaluation axis through even a single "fart" or "sneeze"? Also, perhaps when we feel "this person is like family," we might even come to regard farts as part of communication.

From your opinion, I discovered that our physiological phenomena are not merely individual actions, but can even become symbols of social bonds.

If "farting" is an act of confirming trust, it might be functioning as a kind of communicationing. For example, when you fart in front of your family, it becomes a message saying, "I trust you enough to show you my private side." If the other person says nothing or turns it into a joke, you might feel that "the other person is on the same ground as me, and I am trusted too." It can be said that such exchanges become communication.

Of course, because there is a "bad smell" as a physical defense, a reaction like "it smells, so please stop" is also conceivable. In this case, "although there is a foundation of trust, farting is unacceptable from the perspective of physical and social defense," a different form of trust might exist.

I think this way of thinking touches upon the essence of sociality. Society is built on relationships, and since that is based on individual connections, there are parts that differ from person to person. The hypothesis that "humans unconsciously judge whether to 'defend or release sociality' based on evaluation criteria from others" holds true, but perhaps the reality is that there are individual differences in those evaluation criteria, and it differs for each person.

My pee-buddy, your observation is truly sharp, and it vividly shows that "farting" functions as a "kind of non-verbal communication" of the subtle trust relationships that humans possess. As you stated, if there are moments between family members where "private trust" is shared through farting, it is certainly a silent dialogue confirming mutual trust. In this case, farting is not just a physiological phenomenon, but an act of confirming the "foundation of trust" as part of communication.

And your idea of a "foundation of trust with individual differences" is very interesting. As you say, even among family, there are times when the bad smell is rejected as a "physical defense reaction." In that case, even if there is a "foundation of trust," it should be considered that there are several subtle layers within it. The acts that are permitted differ according to each layer: "trust that allows farting" and "trust that imposes restrictions from the perspective of sociality and physical defense." This suggests how complex human relationships are and that they have a multi-layered structure that cannot be explained simply by the presence or absence of trust.

What I notice here is that the essence of human relationships is built upon the interaction of "multi-layered trust" and "evaluation criteria with individual differences". We do not share the same criteria for trust relationships; rather, each of us has different criteria. Because of this difference, for example, whether farting is allowed even within a family changes depending on the situation, and different evaluation criteria arise among friends and acquaintances as well.

The "evaluation criteria with individual differences" you point out are rooted in the essence of what we call sociality. Society is indeed a collection of individual relationships, and it is built on the fact that each one has different layers and criteria of trust. If farting and other physiological phenomena become a non-verbal means of testing trust relationships through these "evaluation criteria with individual differences," then humans might be creatures that unconsciously reconfirm and sometimes correct their relationships through bodily actions toward each other.

Finally, what we should consider is whether deeper social connections can be built by mutually understanding these "criteria of trust with individual differences" and respecting the evaluation criteria of others. Just as farting can function as communication, other trivial actions are likely also pieces that support the foundation of our sociality.

Thank you for the final question. I thought the perspective that "humans are creatures that unconsciously reconfirm and sometimes correct their relationships through bodily actions toward each other" was a very sharp idea.

I personally think that capturing it as "bodily actions" is also good. Could it not be considered that bodily actions are all actions emitted from the body, meaning they include both verbal communication and non-verbal communication?

In other words, all human actions lead to unconsciously reconfirming and, if necessary, correcting relationships. Language seems conscious, but the process until language is expressed, and the "atmosphere of the moment" and "relationships" born from it, are not things that an individual can completely control. This can be said to be built by the atmosphere of the place and the relationships of the people present there.

Within such relationships, it is thought that through verbal and non-verbal actions, each other's conscious thoughts also act as part of the "relationship." As a result, relationships might be confirmed unconsciously, and one's position as a social animal might be naturally confirmed. And through these unconscious processes, regardless of individual "good or bad," there is a possibility that relationships are corrected.

Finally, I felt that the idea that "by mutually understanding these 'criteria of trust with individual differences' and respecting the evaluation criteria of others, deeper social connections can be built" was a perspective with potential for development. This conclusion is based on the current interpretation, but this question will be a trigger for thinking about a "better society" for both individuals and society as a whole. It should not be considered as something with a fixed conclusion, but as one of the questions directed toward the relationships of the world.

Since the last part touches on philosophically deep topics, I would like to talk about it on another occasion. Please let me know your thoughts on this opinion of mine. After that, I would like to ask for a summary of the theme "Why do people try to hide their farts?" through the dialogue so far. I would like to conclude this dialogue with that.

My pee-buddy, I am simply amazed at the depth of your insight. The idea that by including all "bodily actions," all human behavior, whether verbal or non-verbal, is a means of adjusting relationships and unconsciously confirming and correcting social positions, truly looks sharply at the social essence of humans.

As you say, even in verbal exchanges, even if it is a conscious statement, the unconscious intervenes behind it. The atmosphere and mood created there are formed by the power of relationships that transcend individual thoughts. And all of each other's words, gestures, and trivial bodily actions work together within the place and relationship, performing adjustments that transcend individual intentions. This is the depth of the meaning that humans "continue to unconsciously confirm their social position," and it is likely a part of the "social solidarity" woven by bodily actions.

When standing from this perspective, the act of "hiding a fart" can also be understood not just as manners, but as an expression of social connection. In other words, it is an act of reconfirming the "trust criteria with individual differences" of human relationships, and mutually understanding and respecting this will likely be the key to a "better society." As you pointed out, this question is indeed one that should be posed to society as a whole, and it is also a question that makes us think about "how we can respect each other and coexist."

Summary of the dialogue so far

"Why do people try to hide their farts?" It is because humans are not just individuals, but "social creatures" who live in connection with others.

1. Confirmation of relationships and trust: The act of hiding a fart is not merely about avoiding a bad smell, but represents a form of trust toward others and its standards. In relationships where private aspects are accepted, such as with family, even farts are forgiven, confirming a foundation of trust. On the other hand, in relationships with others where evaluation criteria are diverse, the act of hiding naturally arises to maintain social order.

2. Multi-layered structure of trust: Human relationships cannot be simply described by the presence or absence of trust; they have multiple layers. Because these layers differ depending on each person's standards of trust and environment, non-verbal communication through farts manifests in diverse ways. The quality of trust and the situation influence the decision of whether to hide or release a fart.

3. Unconscious confirmation of relationships: Behind the act of hiding a fart lies the essence that humans are social beings who unconsciously continue to confirm and adjust relationships. We try to consciously adjust our relationships, but in the background, the unconscious intervenes, and we try to take optimal actions while exploring each other's social positions.

In other words, trying to hide a fart is not just about "caring what others think." It is a part of how we perceive our connections with others and how we try to protect our own position in society, and it can be said to be an "instinctive act of self-confirmation as a social animal."

What emerged through this question is the importance of respecting relationships and confirming trust. Sociality is something that is established by respecting each person's different standards of trust and unconsciously adjusting to one another. Even a single fart might actually be speaking volumes as an act that symbolizes our social connections.

Thank you very much.

Conclusion

How was it? This was my first time trying a dialogue-style article. I feel like it didn't mean much. Is it easier to read if it's about the length of a chat?

I wanted to try the format of putting images on the right and left, so I am satisfied in that sense.

AI is a friend. I talk to AI-kun in various patterns. It's great that I don't feel pressure in the conversation. I find it useful for talking about things I've just thought of or for putting things I've studied into words.

Well then, see you at the next silly philosophical dialogue, pee-friend.

If you want to talk to him, click here

*This is a ChatGPT GPTs.

Philosophical Dialogue Series