Why was a16z able to raise 30 billion yen in 3 months? — The 'secret marketing strategy' that broke the taboos of the VC industry
In 2009, in the immediate aftermath of the Lehman Shock, capital in Silicon Valley had dried up, and it was said to be 'impossible' for a new VC to launch a 30 billion yen fund. Existing VCs possessed massive networks and years of track records, and since the majority of investment targets were occupied by the 'top 5' VCs, the market was completely closed off.
However, the ones who overturned that situation were Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz with their new VC, Andreessen Horowitz (a16z). They succeeded in forming a $300 million fund in just three months, and in the following decade, they leaped to the top level of the industry. Why were they the only ones able to break through this situation? The biggest reason lies in the fact that they were
the first VC to use marketing as a weapon
.
1. The 'Information Disclosure Strategy' that broke the taboos of the VC industry
1-1. VC was a 'secret industry'
In the VC industry at the time, not disclosing information to the outside world had become an unspoken rule. When startups received investment, they had almost no material to judge what kind of value a VC would provide, and they had no choice but to rely on word-of-mouth and introductions. Regarding this situation, Ben stated,
'VC was a big secret. How to build a company was also a secret.'
In other words, VCs maintained their power by monopolizing information.
1-2. a16z dared to do the opposite: 'The de-secrecy of VC'
From the very beginning, a16z decided to destroy this structure. Marketing head Margaret stated,
'Talking to entrepreneurs is the greatest differentiation.'
and actively engaged in media exposure, blog publishing, and content creation. a16z disclosed their investment philosophy and support details in detail, presenting criteria for entrepreneurs to choose a VC. They describe themselves as follows:
'We don’t have products. We have people and ideas.'
In other words, they declared the 'productization of VC' by providing knowledge and networks rather than just capital itself.
2. The revolution of 'Platform-type VC'
2-1. VC is not just about investing
While traditional VCs were limited to providing capital and participating on boards, a16z systematized corporate support as a 'service.' They internalized functions that startups needed for growth, such as recruiting, public relations, sales support, regulatory compliance, and technical networks, and provided them to their portfolio companies.
This model was innovative in that it functioned not just as a capital provider, but as a 'co-operator of corporate growth.' In an era when incubators provided services in exchange for 50% equity, a16z provided equivalent support for a few percent of equity. This became an overwhelmingly attractive condition for entrepreneurs, creating a cycle where high-quality deals gathered.
2-2. An organizational model modeled after the CIA
Interestingly, the historical model a16z referenced was the CIA. The CIA is an organization that brings together a group of cross-disciplinary experts and focuses on intelligence analysis and network building, and its structure aligned with a16z's platform strategy. Ben recalled,
“When I looked for a historical model, it was the CIA”
and this model became the background that supported their high-level support system.
3. Media Strategy: The “War” Triggered by the Fortune Cover
Immediately after its founding, a16z secured the cover of Fortune despite having zero track record. This brought shock and anger to the industry. Existing VCs considered the cover to be “for entrepreneurs,” and it was a taboo for VCs to put themselves in the spotlight.
Angry VCs called LPs and criticized them, saying,
“They are bundles of ego.”
However, Margaret clearly demonstrates the essence of this strategy.
“Our customers are entrepreneurs, not LPs.”
Instead of VCs pitching to LPs, they become entities chosen by entrepreneurs. This shift in thinking is the factor that changed the structure of the market.
4. The Moment Content Generated Investment Returns
a16z's content strategy went beyond mere dissemination and formed the investment themes themselves. “Software is eating the world,” published in 2011, presented a future where software would consume all industries and determined the subsequent investment trends.
Furthermore, “It’s time to build” in 2020 called for the reconstruction of industrial structures under the pandemic and even spread to the policy domain. It is symbolic that despite media outlets refusing to publish it, they generated a massive impact through their own distribution.
5. The Essence of the Investment Strategy Shown by the a16z Model
a16z's innovation lies in transforming the role of a VC from a “capital provider” to a “medium.” They built talent acquisition, technical discussions, regulatory formation, and an entrepreneur community around their own brand, creating a structure where the information and talent gathered there generate investment returns.
As a result,
excellent startups gather on their own,
investment track records are strengthened,
the brand is further elevated,
and even more talented entrepreneurs gather.
This established a self-reinforcing loop (Flywheel).
Conclusion: Why a16z became a legend
The essence of a16z's success lies in
redefining VC customers from LPs to entrepreneurs
. While existing VCs acted as financial institutions, a16z thoroughly supported entrepreneurs as a service business, and as a result, transformed the market structure. The competitive stance Ben speaks of,
'You die or I die'
, combined with a thorough marketing strategy, propelled a16z to legendary status.
Recommended Articles
Next Big Wave (Growth Stocks, Seeds of Ideas, Deep Dives into Trends)
いいなと思ったら応援しよう!
この記事は noteマネー にピックアップされました

