"Caged Bird Longing for Clouds" — The Managerial Significance of the Psychology of the Confined Yearning for Freedom

3 Essentials You Can Learn from This Blog on How "a Sense of Confinement Destroys Organizations"

A bird in a cage longs for the clouds. Those deprived of freedom crave the space they have lost. This scene is a poetic expression recorded in Chinese classics 3,000 years ago, yet it is no different from what is happening in workplaces in the 2020s.

"Top talent suddenly quitting," "the endless calls to return to remote work," "employees who only wait for instructions and lack initiative"—these are all symptoms of the "organizational collapse caused by a sense of confinement" that the caged bird longing for clouds warns about. The problem is not salary or benefits, but rather the deprivation of autonomy.

There are three essentials you can take away from this blog.

• A sense of confinement is the biggest trigger for turnover: A lack of autonomy creates a 2.3 times higher risk of turnover than dissatisfaction with salary

• - Creativity dies even in a cage: It has been proven that intrinsic motivation drops significantly in a controlled environment

• - The "cage that looks like freedom" is the most dangerous: The mechanism by which superficial delegation of authority functions as fake autonomy and backfires

We will decipher these three points using data and real-life examples.

The Origin of "Caged Bird Longing for Clouds" and the Eastern Philosophical View of "Yearning for Freedom"

Reading: Rochoren-un

Meaning: A bird trapped in a cage longing for the clouds in the vast sky. By extension, it refers to the state of mind of someone placed under restraint or confinement who yearns for their former freedom or a wider world.

Origin: An expression dating back to poetry and prose from the Song Dynasty in China. Similar sentiments of "caged birds" and "longing for the forest" can be found in the poems of the Tang Dynasty poet Bai Juyi (772–846), and the literary lineage of lamenting confinement using the bird as a symbol of freedom is very old. By the Song Dynasty, the expression "a bird in a cage longs for the clouds" became established among scholars as a conventional metaphor for expressing a yearning for freedom, nostalgia, and the sense of confinement caused by government service. It was introduced to Japan during the Heian and Kamakura periods along with the study of Chinese poetry and prose, and samurai and scholars of the Edo period also used this expression to overlay their own career competition within the "cage" of their feudal domains with a longing for freedom.

Antonyms:

• Fish obtaining water (Gyo-toku-suisei): The state of being active and vigorous after finding one's natural environment. It is the exact opposite of a caged bird longing for clouds, representing a state created by the alignment of autonomy and environment.

• - High spirits (Iki-yoyo): The state of being full of motivation and lively. It can be said to be the state after the restraints have been removed.

Context in Modern Management: The reason why "caged bird longing for clouds" hits home in management is that most organizations are composed of "cages made with good intentions." Managers set up approval flows to protect their subordinates, create regulations, and enclose actions with KPIs. The intention is correct. But as a result, the cage is completed. The more talented the person, the more they have an eye for the clouds, and the more talented they are, the sooner they fly away the moment they notice the cage.

The Science of How "Deprivation of Autonomy" Destroys Organizations

Core: A sense of constraint destroys fundamental human psychological needs, simultaneously damaging performance, creativity, and retention rates.

Self-Determination Theory, developed by Edward Deci and Richard Ryan in 1985,Self-Determination Theory is one of the most important theories that has scientifically elucidated human motivation. This theory posits that humans have three basic psychological needs: "Autonomy," "Competence," and "Relatedness." When these are met, intrinsic motivation increases, and when they are thwarted, motivation drops sharply. Among these, numerous experiments by Deci and his colleagues have confirmed that the deprivation of autonomy has such a powerful effect that it destroys overall motivation even if the other two needs are satisfied.

Research by Deci and Ryan at the University of Rochester (Deci & Ryan, 2000, "The 'What' and 'Why' of Goal Pursuits", Psychological Inquiry) shows that subjects who were subjected to strong external control (surveillance, strict deadlines, micro-instructions) had significantly lower performance on creative tasks and reduced interest in the tasks compared to subjects in the autonomy condition.

Creativity research conducted by Teresa Amabile of Harvard Business School (Amabile, T.M., 1996, Creativity in Context) demonstrated the"doorway effect" where external surveillance, evaluation, and constraints inhibit creativity. Amabile surveyed diverse creative workers such as poets, painters, and researchers, and showed that groups who felt their "work choices were restricted" had statistically significantly lower quality of creative output compared to groups with high autonomy.

From the perspective of organizational behavior, in the global employee engagement survey continuously conducted by Gallup (State of the Global Workplace, annual editions), it has been repeatedly confirmed that employees who answer that they "can make their own decisions at work" have significantly higher engagement scores and lower voluntary turnover rates compared to those who do not. There is a clear positive correlation between a sense of autonomy and retention rates.

Furthermore, what is often overlooked is the problem of "Psychological Reactance." This concept, proposed by Jack Brehm in 1966, refers to the psychology that "when human freedom is threatened, humans desire the threatened freedom more strongly." In other words, the more management is strengthened, the more the employees' "thirst for freedom"—the state of a caged bird longing for clouds—accelerates. It is the paradox that strengthening management invites rebellion and defection.

In the field of stak's AI/DX training business, we repeatedly witness this composition. The more an organization is "stuck in micromanagement," the less employees proactively start using tools even after AI is introduced. It is not a tool problem, but a problem of habits where autonomy has been stripped away.

The Power of "Autonomy-by-Design Management" Seen at Cloudflare, Denso, and Canva

Cloudflare — How a Security Company Implements Autonomy Deeper Than the "20% Rule"

The U.S. network security company Cloudflare (founded in 2009, with a market capitalization of over $40 billion as of 2024) places engineer autonomy at the center of its organizational design, despite being in an industry with strong constraints like infrastructure.

Cloudflare adopts the principle of "Small Team, High Autonomy." As CEO Matthew Prince has repeatedly mentioned in public interviews, the company intentionally keeps engineering teams small and structures them so that each team is "responsible for their own product area." The hierarchy of approval flows is minimized, and a system is in place where engineers can test prototypes in near-production environments based on their own judgment.

As a result, many developer platform product groups like Cloudflare Workers and Cloudflare Pages were born from the spontaneous ideas of engineers. This autonomy-by-design is the background that allows for aggressive product development in the "defensive" industry of security. It is a typical example of management that does not build a cage, or if it does, does not lock it.

Denso — Continuous Innovation Born from "On-site Autonomy" in Manufacturing

Denso, a major automotive parts manufacturer headquartered in Aichi Prefecture, is a manufacturing giant that operates in over 150 countries around the world as a key supplier for the Toyota Group. Manufacturing appears to be a field where the "cage" of quality control and standard work is most necessary. However, Denso has a unique system that balances on-site autonomy with standardization.

The "Creative Suggestion System" that Denso has practiced for many years is a mechanism that allows on-site workers to propose ideas for process improvement, cost reduction, and quality enhancement themselves. According to the company's public information, the number of annual proposals reaches the scale of hundreds of thousands. What is important is that "supervisors are not obligated to adopt the proposals." Because the proposal itself is evaluated and the act of proposing is valued, the workplace does not fall into a caged-bird state where employees feel "it's useless to say anything."

In the manufacturing floor, which is the environment with the most constraints, autonomous problem discovery and improvement proposals have taken root as a culture. Standard work functions as a "minimal cage," and outside of it, the "sky" of proposals spreads wide. It is the reverse design of a caged bird longing for clouds.

Canva — A case where the "democratic design" philosophy realized autonomy both inside and outside the company simultaneously

The Australian-born design platform Canva (founded in 2013) had over 170 million users as of 2024, and its valuation reached $26 billion. The vision that CEO Melanie Perkins consistently speaks of is a democratization philosophy of "making design accessible to everyone," but this is also deeply reflected in the company's organizational design.

Canva adopts a structure that can be called "Mission-led Autonomy". Employees are strongly committed to the mission of "realizing democratic design," and within that broad framework, they are given significant discretion in setting product priorities, the direction of features, and how to build teams. CEO Perkins stated in a Forbes interview, "If I were deciding everything, I would have failed a long time ago. My job is to create an environment where talented people can think and act for themselves."

What three companies with completely different industries, regions, and scales have in common is the philosophy of "designing the shape of the cage so that autonomy is maximized" rather than "completely removing the cage." Cloudflare makes the cage smaller with a small-team system, Denso opens a window in the cage with a suggestion system, and Canva uses its mission instead of a cage. Even if the forms are different, the essence of designing an environment where birds do not have to look at the clouds from inside a cage is the same.

The "reverse design of a caged bird longing for clouds" implemented by stak

I myself have faced this problem head-on while managing stak, Inc.

I will be honest. In the early days of stak, I created a kind of "cage of good intentions." When entering a client for an AI training project, I specified the formats for proposals, slides, and scripts in detail, and called it "quality control" for staff members to follow them. The intention was pure. I just wanted to protect the quality.

However, at one point, a staff member said to me, "Because you decide everything, Ueda-san, I've started to feel that whatever I think doesn't matter." These words stung. I was the one building the cage.

From there, what I changed was not the format, but the "design of the questions." I switched to a structure that says, "Instead of 'do it this way,' first think for yourself about what this client needs, and propose it to me." I made it a form where I don't judge, but rather refine things together while respecting the staff member's judgment.

The effect appeared faster than I thought. Not only did the quality of proposals improve, but the staff members themselves began to take ownership of their relationships with clients. This is one of the reasons behind the increase in repeat rates and customer satisfaction in stak's AI training business.

The mission of stak, Inc. is to "create an overwhelmingly rational society," but that rationality includes "environment design where humans can act autonomously." When redefining labor costs as time using AI, the future of the organization will be completely different depending on whether you turn that time into "managed time" or "autonomous time."

Summary

What the caged bird longing for clouds asks of managers are three questions.

• Does your organization have a "cage built with good intentions"?: In the name of management, quality, and efficiency, are you unconsciously stripping away autonomy?

• - Do you notice the signs that talented people are "looking at the clouds"?: Waiting for instructions, the disappearance of proposals, and quiet quitting are signals that a caged bird is longing for the clouds.

• - Are you able to "design" freedom rather than just "granting" it?: Throwing discretion at someone is not designing autonomy. Designing the structure of missions, questions, and room for maneuver is the manager's job.

As Deci and Ryan's self-determination theory shows, autonomy is a fundamental human psychological need. Whether you satisfy or deprive it cannot be solved by salary or benefits. It can only be changed through the design of the environment.

It is scary to unlock the cage. Anxiety about letting go of control is a natural feeling for a manager. But I want to ask: within that cage, are you not also looking at the clouds right now? Managers, too, can sometimes be trapped inside the cages they have built themselves.

The design of autonomy begins with the liberation of the manager themselves.

Follow stak, Inc. CEO Shinichiro Ueda

Sharing the latest management know-how, AI utilization, and stak trends every day.

Follow @shin16o

[Click here for details (full text on stak.tech)]