Authenticity Orientation | An Indicator of Whether You Are Speaking from the Heart
🎧“Listen” to the note |▶️Listen to the audio summary
◆ Evaluation Scale (100-point scale)
Score Range
《90–100》
Overwhelming realism as a true record or personal account. The descriptions are specific, unique, and beyond doubt.
《70–89》
Likely based on real experience, but embellishments or emotional descriptions slightly dominate.
《50–69》
The emotional thread is strong, but the episodes and unique elements are abstract, leaving a “written assignment” feel.
《30–49》
The theme is good, but the structure and development are predictable. It feels too polished as reading material.
《0–29》
Highly contrived; unlikely to be perceived as experience-based (strong PR or fictional feel).
Score the target article out of 100 based on the following evaluation indicators.
◆ Evaluation Criteria (Total 100 points):
1. Depth of Personal Involvement (15 points) - How deeply does it delve into real experience (are the situation, emotions, and inner motivations all depicted?)
2. Rawness of Emotional Expression (10 points) - Are joy, anger, sorrow, pleasure, confusion, and conflict depicted at a level the reader can feel on their own skin?
3. “Natural Voice” of the Writing Style (10 points) - Is it not overly polished, and do the author’s spoken language and thought patterns appear in the text?
4. Disclosure of Shame, Weakness, and Unresolved Parts (10 points) - Does the author courageously disclose “things they don’t want to say” / is it not too neatly summarized?
5. Interaction with Others (10 points) - Does it go beyond a self-contained perspective to depict interactions and conflicts with others?
6. Unique Perspective (10 points) - Does it offer interpretations or meanings that only that person can provide (does it make the reader think, “I’m reading this because it’s them”?)?
7. Risk of Expression (10 points) - Does it step into content that might be misunderstood by readers or potentially criticized?
8. White Space and Contradictions in the Text (5 points) - Does it avoid over-explaining, leaving room for the reader to think / is it not too perfect?
9. Ability to Recreate Scenes and Conversations (5 points) - Are there descriptions of conversations, sounds, and locations that allow the scene to be imagined in three dimensions?
10. Residual Emotional “Temperature” After Reading (5 points) - Does the “heat of emotion” or an “impression” remain with the reader rather than just knowledge?
《Click here for LLC-HOUSE Official》