SYSTEM NOTICE

Auto translation by AI. Be sure, accuracy, nuances and authorial intent may not be fully reflected.

Fokker-Planck + Modified Hamilton-Jacobi → Schrödinger

— Is Nelson's assumption arbitrary? —


1. Location of the problem

In Nelson's stochastic mechanics,

  • Fokker-Planck equation (time evolution of probability density)

  • Modified Hamilton-Jacobi equation (phase information of motion)

from these two pillars,

ψ = √P · exp(i S / ħ)

the Schrödinger equation is obtained using the following variable transformation.

The question that naturally arises at this point is:

Is this variable transformation arbitrary (a convenient assumption)?


2. Conclusion (preview)

It is not completely arbitrary, but it is not purely necessary either.
It is the 'minimal choice' that satisfies physical and mathematical requirements.


3. Starting point: Two nonlinear equations

In Nelson's framework, there are two unknown functions:

  • P(x,t): Probability density

  • S(x,t): Action (phase)

These satisfy the following:

(1) Continuity equation (probability conservation)

∂P/∂t + ∇·(P v) = 0

(2) Modified Hamilton-Jacobi

∂S/∂t + (∇S)^2/(2m) + V + Q(P) = 0

Nonlinear system of equations


4. Why one wants to 'integrate' them

As it stands:

  • The equations are nonlinear and difficult to handle

  • P and S are separated

  • The linear structure (superposition) is not visible

Therefore

Can it be expressed with a single function?

This motivation arises.


5. Requirements for variable transformation

Conditions required for the new function ψ:

  1. Can represent probability density

    1. |ψ|^2 = P

  2. Velocity is derived from phase

    1. v = (1/m) ∇S

  3. Want to make it a linear time-evolution equation

  4. Must be a local differential equation


6. The resulting form

The simplest form that satisfies these is:

ψ = √P · exp(i S / ħ)

Amplitude (√P) + Phase (S)


7. What actually happens

Using this ψ:

  • Real part → Modified Hamilton-Jacobi

  • Imaginary part → Continuity equation

are reproduced simultaneously.

And as a whole:

iħ ∂ψ/∂t = -(ħ^2/2m) ∇^2ψ + Vψ

Schrödinger equation


8. Where does the arbitrariness lie?

The following points involve choices:

  • The velocity field can be written as a potential (v = ∇S/m)

  • Identification of the diffusion coefficient (D = ħ/2m)

  • Adoption of complex exponential functions

Not completely inevitable


9. Reasons why it is still not arbitrary

On the other hand, when conditions are imposed, the degrees of freedom almost disappear:

  • The need to satisfy |ψ|² = P

  • Representing motion by phase gradient

  • Requirement of linearity

  • Locality

If these are satisfied simultaneously

it converges almost uniquely to ψ = √P e^{iS/ħ}


10. Mathematical identity

This transformation is:

an operation that converts a nonlinear system (P, S) into a linear system (ψ)

and,

  • Cole-Hopf transformation

  • conversion to polar form

has the same structure as.


11. Organizing Perspectives

Nelson side

  • diffusion

  • density

  • mechanics

explaining 'why it becomes quantum'


Schrödinger side

  • linearity

  • superposition

  • eigenvalue problem

calculating 'what happens'


12. Final Conclusion

Nelson's variable transformation is not an arbitrarily chosen assumption, but the minimal choice to integrate probability density and action to realize a linear structure.
Therefore, it is
**a 'structurally constrained choice' that is neither arbitrary nor completely inevitable.**



In one sentence

ψ = √P e^{iS/ħ} is the minimal and essential variable transformation for mapping nonlinear mechanics to a linear wave equation while simultaneously preserving probability (P) and motion (S).

いいなと思ったら応援しよう!