Should Companies Be Protected or Destroyed? — A Sober Reality for Those Who Think They Should Be 'Crushed'
# Should companies be protected or destroyed?
## — A sober reality for those who think they should be 'crushed' —
---
## Introduction
"Is there any need to protect such a strange company?"
"Wouldn't it be better to just crush it?"
Most people go through a moment where they think this at least once.
Unreasonable rules
Meaningless meetings
Efforts that go unrewarded
Fewer seats available the higher you go
When you see it all, you start to think.
👉 Isn't this system wrong?
---
## Chapter 1: Starting with the conclusion
Let's be clear first.
👉 The idea that we should just crush everything is realistically wrong.
The reason is simple.
- Companies = create employment
- Companies = keep the economy moving
- Companies = the foundation of daily life
In other words,
👉 If companies disappear, society collapses.
It may be correct as an emotional response.
But as a structure, it doesn't hold up.
---
## Chapter 2: So, what is a 'company worth protecting'?
This is the essence.
There is no need to protect every company.
This is a fact.
Companies worth protecting are those that:
- Generate profit
- Provide value to society
- Are 'functioning' rather than wasteful
Conversely,
👉 There are also companies that don't need to be protected.
- Those that just exist
- Those with no productivity
- Those that are of no use to anyone
Such companies are naturally weeded out.
---
## Chapter 3: In fact, they are already 'crushed'
Many people fail to see this.
In the modern age,
👉 Companies are already being crushed every day.
- Bankruptcy
- Acquisitions
- Business withdrawals
In other words,
👉 "It would be better to crush them" is a phenomenon already taking place.
Your intuition isn't off.
It's just an "ongoing reality."
---
## Chapter 4: The problem isn't the 'number of companies'
This is the real problem.
👉 The quality of the companies.
- Companies that create meaningless work
- Companies that just wear people out
- Structures that stop growth
These kinds of companies are the problem.
Therefore, what is needed is
👉 Not crushing, but 'replacing'.
---
## Chapter 5: Will you be the one to crush, or the one to use?
This is where it gets important.
You have three choices.
① Stay while complaining about the company
② Move to a better company
③ Become someone who creates value yourself
And the reality is this:
👉 Only a very small number of people can be on the side that does the crushing.
Therefore, most people should think about
👉 "How to use the company."
---
## Chapter 6: This is the real battle
It's not about whether to crush the company.
👉 It's about whether you are on the side that gets crushed.
- No skills
- No market value
- Dependent
In this state,
👉 You're finished regardless of what happens to the company.
Conversely,
- Having skills that work anywhere
- Being able to earn on your own
- Having options
People like this
👉 Are not controlled by the company.
---
## Chapter 7: The trap of extreme arguments
"We should just crush them all."
This idea seems strong at first glance.
But in reality,
👉 It's close to a cessation of thought.
Because
- Nothing is created just by destroying
- There is no alternative system
What is important is
👉 Not destroying, but 'evolving'.
---
## In conclusion
Companies are not perfect entities.
In fact, they are full of imperfections.
But
👉 They are 'mechanisms' that support society.
Therefore, the conclusion is this:
- There is no need to protect them all
- But crushing them all is also wrong
👉 Things without value disappear, and only things with value remain.
In that flow,
👉 Where will you stand?
That is what matters most.
---
## Summarized in one sentence
👉 "Rather than whether to crush the company, stand on the side that won't be crushed."