[Yahoo! Comments Re-distribution] Comments on the article: 'Fuji TV's cancelled Expo live show "Poka Poka" announces rescheduled performance; to be held on the same day, May 18th, at a "facility in Osaka Prefecture"; details currently being adjusted'
Posted on April 21, 2025, at 21:13
Given that the cancellation of the event at the Expo site was caused by issues involving Kimchi TV, including the Nakai incident, why was the decision made to hold a rescheduled performance?
Certainly, I think it is necessary to provide an opportunity for the members who have worked hard to reach the target number of visitors within the "Poka Poka" program to be rewarded.
However, it is clearly too late to be thinking about this now, with less than a month left until the originally scheduled date. I think the only option is to use available resources, such as the 'Nandemo Arena' at the Kansai TV headquarters, which has experience with general public viewing, or to utilize the location where Ota held his press conference, but the capacity is clearly insufficient.
They will have no choice but to delay the timing and focus on finding a facility that meets the capacity requirements of the original venue.
Even so, in the case of general viewing at the Expo for the Kansai TV program, it seems that reservations are being handled collectively on the Expo website rather than by each broadcasting station, so I wonder if this will interfere with pavilion reservations.
・Response comment to the reply: 'Your cocky comment is annoying'
Posted on April 21, 2025, at 23:00
I am not making a cocky comment. At the very least, considering how they appeared on the "Poka Poka" program, I want the members of SHOW-WA and MATSURI, who were supposed to stand on that stage, to be rewarded.
In what way do you consider that to be cocky?
・Response comment to the reply: 'Just because it's a station that did something bad, doesn't mean you can say whatever you want'
Posted on April 21, 2025, at 23:00 (Posted with the previous response comment)
Certainly, one cannot say whatever they want, and it goes without saying that comments violating the comment policy, such as slander, are out of the question.
I am merely commenting on the facts and sharing my thoughts on possible measures under these circumstances.
Reading the article, it could be interpreted that an alternative venue has already been secured. Is it at the stage where they are just finalizing the specific details?
If by any chance they cannot secure one, they will have no choice but to use Kansai TV's resources to make it in time.
・Response comment to the reply: 'Kimchi TV? How long are you going to keep talking about that? Some people are embarrassing'
Posted on April 21, 2025, at 23:04
It may be embarrassing depending on one's perspective, but the fact that street protests occurred is an undeniable truth.
I cannot get the image of that infamous MAD video out of my head, so when I comment on this matter, that is how I end up phrasing it.
I am curious about the background behind the decision to air it without any objections, even when Hie was in a position of power.
・Response comment to the reply: 'Fuji TV isn't the only mass media TV station that broadcasts nothing but K-POP idols and Korean trends until it makes some viewers uncomfortable...'
Posted on April 21, 2025, at 23:16
Certainly, lately, Nippon TV, which is competing in the 'shutdown race,' has a bigger image of pushing Korean content.
Despite the Sexy Tanaka-san issue, they are repeating the same mistakes, and people are expressing it by linking them to anti-social forces and cults.
・Response comment to the reply: 'Your comment sounds so condescending, it's annoying (bitter laugh)'
Posted on April 21, 2025, at 23:16 (Posted with the previous response comment)
In the first place, I am just commenting on what I think exactly as it is. If you still think it's condescending, perhaps you think that way because you are looking at it from a different dimension.