Design Act Article 10: Related Designs
This article provides an exception to Article 9 of the Design Act. This article is a unique provision of the Design Act (there are no corresponding provisions in the Patent Act, etc.).
1. Design Act Article 10, Paragraph 1
As a general rule, a design (related design) that is similar to a certain design (principal design) cannot be registered under the provisions of Article 9. However, by utilizing the related design system under this article, it is possible to obtain registration for a design (related design) that is similar to a certain design (principal design).
The related design system was established to respond to (i) the fact that design strategies were becoming more agile and diversified, and (ii) the trend of building a unique worldview and increasing the added value of products by using a common, consistent design concept for a company's products.
In practice, it is used to (1) strengthen rights by surrounding a single base design with related designs, and (2) protect designs that change over time with design rights. For this reason, it seems there is a practice of not proceeding with registration (not disclosing a useless design) if it is determined that the related design is not similar to the base design after filing the application for the related design.
2. Design Act Article 10, Paragraph 2
Regarding related designs, in relation to the principal design, the application of Article 3, Paragraphs 1 and 2 is excluded (Article 10, Paragraph 2).
To be precise, when attempting to obtain registration as a related design, a design that is identical or similar to one's own design that has become publicly known (the principal design) is treated as if it had not become publicly known. This is because it is conceivable that the principal design has become publicly known by the time of filing the related design application due to the publication of a design bulletin or self-implementation.
Looking at it from another perspective, Article 10, Paragraph 2 of the Design Act does not apply to designs that are identical or similar to another person's design that has become publicly known. For this reason, it is possible that an application may be rejected on the grounds that another person's design similar to the related design has become publicly known.
3. Design Act Article 10, Paragraph 3
If a related design is similar to the applicant's secret design (prior application), and the related design is filed during the period from the publication of the secret design (prior application) bulletin to the lifting of secrecy, it will be rejected under Article 3-2. For this reason, the application of the proviso to Article 3-2 regarding related designs is excluded until the day before the publication of the design bulletin issued when secrecy is lifted (Article 10, Paragraph 3).
4. Design Act Article 10, Paragraph 4
This paragraph is a provision that recognizes related designs of related designs. Specifically, a design that is similar only to a related design can be registered as a related design under the provisions of Paragraph 1 by treating said related design as the principal design. Furthermore, for a design that is only similar to a stepwise related design that chains to said related design, it is also possible to obtain registration in the same manner by treating the related design to which said design is similar as the principal design. Previously, to prevent an infinite chain of similarities, designs that were only similar to a related design could not be registered.
For specific infinite chains of related designs (related designs of related designs), please check Mazda's presentation materials. I think the chain of vehicle designs in these materials is easy to understand.
5. Design Act Article 10, Paragraph 5
This paragraph stipulates the filing period for related designs of related designs under Article 10, Paragraph 4. If the filing period for a related design of a related design under Article 10, Paragraph 4 were to be up to 10 years from the filing of the related design treated as the principal design, a single group of designs would be permanently protected through a chain of related designs. For this reason, the filing period for a related design of a related design under Article 10, Paragraph 4 is set to up to 10 years from the filing of the initially selected principal design.
6. Design Act Article 10, Paragraph 6
This paragraph stipulates that a related design cannot be registered for a principal design for which an exclusive license has been established. Note that (i) setting a non-exclusive license only for the principal design, or (ii) setting an exclusive license for both the principal design and the related design at the same time, is not a problem.
7. Design Act Article 10, Paragraph 7
This paragraph states that if multiple related designs are registered for a principal design, it is possible that the related designs are similar to each other. In such cases, the provisions of Article 9, Paragraphs 1 and 2 do not apply between the related designs themselves.
8. Design Act Article 10, Paragraph 8
There are cases where multiple related designs of a principal design and sequential related designs linked to said related design are registered (especially in cases of infinite chains). Exception provisions for Article 3, Paragraphs 1 and 2 are established for these related designs among themselves.
・Design Act Article 10
(Related Designs) Article 10: An applicant for design registration may, for a design that is similar to one design selected from among the applicant's own design registration applications or the applicant's own registered designs (hereinafter referred to as the "principal design") (such a similar design is hereinafter referred to as a "related design"), obtain design registration, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 9, Paragraph 1 or 2, provided that the application for design registration for said related design is filed on or after the filing date of the application for design registration of said principal design and before the date on which ten years have elapsed from the filing date of the application for design registration of said principal design (in the case of an application for design registration accompanied by a claim of priority under Article 43, Paragraph 1, Article 43-3, Paragraph 1 or 2 of the Patent Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 15, Paragraph 1, the filing date of the first application, or the date of the application deemed to be the first application pursuant to Article 4(C)(4) of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property of March 20, 1883, as revised at Brussels on December 14, 1900, at Washington on June 2, 1911, at The Hague on November 6, 1925, at London on June 2, 1934, at Lisbon on October 31, 1958, and at Stockholm on July 14, 1967, or the date of the application recognized as the first application pursuant to Article 4(A)(2) of said Convention; the same applies hereinafter in this paragraph). However, this does not apply if, at the time of the registration of the establishment of the design right for said related design, the design right for said principal design has been extinguished pursuant to the provisions of Article 44, Paragraph 4, a trial decision to the effect that it should be invalidated has become final and binding, or it has been waived.
(2) Among the applicant's own designs that have come to fall under Article 3, Paragraph 1, Item 1 or 2, those that are identical or similar to the principal design of the design for which the applicant intends to obtain design registration pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph are deemed not to have come to fall under Article 3, Paragraph 1, Item 1 or 2, with regard to the application of the provisions of Article 3, Paragraph 1 and 2 to the design for which the applicant intends to obtain design registration.
(3) With regard to the application of the proviso of Article 3-2 to a design for which the applicant intends to obtain design registration pursuant to the provisions of Paragraph 1, the phrase "(excluding those in which the matters listed in Article 3, Paragraph 3, Item 4 are published pursuant to the provisions of Article 20, Paragraph 4)" in the proviso of Article 3-2 is deemed to be replaced with "(limited to those in which the matters listed in Article 3, Paragraph 3, Item 4 are published pursuant to the provisions of Article 20, Paragraph 4, if the applicant requested that the earlier design registration application be kept secret pursuant to the provisions of Article 14, Paragraph 1)".
(4) For a design that is similar only to a related design for which design registration is to be obtained pursuant to the provisions of Paragraph 1, design registration may be obtained by deeming said related design to be the principal design, pursuant to the provisions of the same paragraph. The same applies to a design that is similar only to a related design for which design registration is deemed obtainable, and to a design that is similar only to a sequential related design linked to said related design.
(5) With regard to the application of the provisions of Paragraph 1 in the case of the preceding paragraph, the term "said principal design" in the same paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "the one design initially selected pertaining to said related design".
(6) If an exclusive license has been established for the design right of a principal design, design registration cannot be obtained for a related design pertaining to said principal design, notwithstanding the provisions of Paragraph 1 and 4.
(7) In the case where an application for design registration of a related design is filed, if said application for design registration is for two or more designs that each fall under a related design (meaning a related design of said basic design and a sequential related design linked to said related design) pertaining to a basic design (meaning the one design initially selected pertaining to said related design; the same applies hereinafter), the provisions of Article 9, Paragraph 1 or 2 do not apply to these designs.
(8) In the case prescribed in the preceding paragraph, among the applicant's own designs that have come to fall under Article 3, Paragraph 1, Item 1 or 2, those that are identical or similar to a related design pertaining to said basic design (excluding cases where the application for design registration of said related design has been waived, withdrawn, or dismissed, or where a decision or trial decision to the effect that the application for design registration of said related design should be refused has become final and binding, or where the design right of said related design has been extinguished pursuant to the provisions of Article 44, Paragraph 4, a trial decision to the effect that it should be invalidated has become final and binding, or it has been waived) are deemed not to have come to fall under Article 3, Paragraph 1, Item 1 or 2, with regard to the application of the provisions of Article 3, Paragraph 1 and 2 to the design for which the applicant intends to obtain design registration pursuant to the provisions of Paragraph 1.
●Past Articles
・(~'22/02/05) Design Act Article 10: Related Designs
#PatentAttorney #PatentAttorneyExam #PatentAttorneyExamStudy #IntellectualProperty #IntellectualPropertyLaw #DesignAct #RelatedDesign
#DailyNote #Column #DailyUpdate #note #DailyPost #noteDailyUpdate #Daily #RecentLearning #DailyUpdateClub #ThoughtColumn #Creative #ProfessionalServices
