SYSTEM NOTICE

Auto translation by AI. Be sure, accuracy, nuances and authorial intent may not be fully reflected.
見出し画像

Trademark Law: It is better to avoid two-line trademarks

Due to application costs, two-line trademarks are sometimes filed.

However, it seems that in reality, those two-line trademarks are often not used as such, but are instead used as single-line trademarks.

A specific example is Trademark Registration No. 5152695. Trademark Registration No. 5152695 is a two-line trademark consisting of "Platinum Pork" and "Shirogane Buta" as shown below.

https://www.j-platpat.inpit.go.jp/c1800/TR/JP-2006-119524/73C5EE2CA7C52A04E776C286826B952EBDFC57B1F77BCA7FE30D37E92C69E22B/40/ja

The trademark holder for Trademark Registration No. 5152695 is Kogen Seibaku Co., Ltd., but on the Kogen Seibaku Co., Ltd. website, the single-line trademark "Shirogane Buta" was used.

Since you likely want to keep expenses down when founding a company, you should reduce the number of applications even if you do file.

Also, considering the possibility of a request for a trial for cancellation based on non-use, I believe you should file the trademark that you actually intend to use.

In this example, I think it would have been better to file the main trademark application as the single-line "Shirogane Buta" and recommend the use of the single-line trademark "Shirogane Buta" on the company website as a countermeasure against a trial for cancellation based on non-use.

#PatentAttorney #PatentAttorneyExam #PatentAttorneyExamStudy #IntellectualProperty #IntellectualPropertyLaw #TrademarkLaw
#DailyNote #Column #DailyUpdate #note #DailyPost #noteDailyUpdate #Daily #RecentLearning #DailyUpdateClub #AnalysisColumn #Creative #ProfessionalServices

いいなと思ったら応援しよう!

この記事が参加している募集