[100-Yen Experiment] Why my emotions rejected the articles that 4 AIs recommended I buy
Prologue: The night I was betrayed by 4 AIs
A "perfect analytical result" was right in front of me.
Claude, Gemini, GPT, and Genspark
—a list of "paid notes to buy" selected by four AIs.
The price range, strategy patterns, and revenue structures all made perfect sense.

But, I couldn't buy a single one.
Why?
Because my emotions weren't moved.
The reason this discovery will change your sales
I realized something.
"Analyzing articles that sell" and "discovering articles that make you want to buy" are completely different things.
And if you can analyze this "moment of wanting to buy":
Your articles will turn into "articles people want to buy"
You will understand the reader's true purchasing psychology
You will be able to understand "human emotions" that AIs cannot find
Experiment Start: A complete record of the "moment of purchase"
So, I started a new experiment.
[Experiment Details]
Completely ignore AI recommendations
Only purchase articles that I felt "I want to read!"
Thoroughly analyze "why I bought them"
Record and systematize that psychological process
[The value of the experiment]
Obtaining the "raw data" of purchasing psychology
Identifying the "emotional elements" of articles that sell
Discovering "purchasing triggers" that you can apply to your own articles
The "surprising results" are already coming into view

It has only been a few days since the experiment started, but there are already interesting findings:
Articles the AI insisted I "must buy!" → My emotions were completely unmoved
A 100-yen article I found by chance → I decided to buy it immediately
What is the difference? Where was the "switch that makes you want to buy"?
I am recording the answer to that in real time.
What you will gain
From this experiment record, you will learn:
✅ The psychology of the moment a reader decides to "buy"
✅ The true nature of "emotional triggers" that AI cannot analyze
✅ Elements that make people want something regardless of price
✅ The problems with articles that are logically correct but don't sell
✅ Concrete methods to turn your articles into ones people want to buy
Because it is a "growing article," now is the best value
This experiment record is published as an "evolving article."
Because it is a "growing article," now is the best value
This experiment record uses a "price system linked to the number of purchasers."
[Current status]
Purchasers: 2
Current price: 100 yen
Until next price increase: 3 more people
[Planned Price Progression]
5 purchasers reached: 200 yen
10 purchasers reached: 300 yen
Every 5 purchasers thereafter: +100 yen
Existing purchasers can read all updated content without additional fees even after the price increases.
In other words, it is a system where the earlier you buy, the overwhelmingly better the deal is.
Limited Bonus: 'Experiment Participation Rights' for purchasers only
I have prepared a special bonus for purchasers:
Add your 'article that made you want to buy' to the analysis targets
If you tell me 'the reason you were drawn to this article' in the comments section, I will add it to my experimental data and share a more accurate 'purchasing psychology analysis'.
Reasons to decide now
This article:
Increases in price as the experiment progresses
Increases in value as data grows
Is an overwhelmingly better deal for early purchasers
For those who want to understand true human psychology without relying on AI.
Why not participate for 100 yen in an experiment that turns your articles into 'articles that make people want to buy'?
👉 [Experiment Report] My experimental record of failing to buy the article the AI chose
(Currently 100 yen / Planned to be 200 yen at next update)
P.S. This article itself is also an experiment in 'articles that make people want to buy'. If you are hesitating to purchase, the reason for that 'hesitation' is also valuable experimental data. Please do let me know.
いいなと思ったら応援しよう!
「応援いただけると嬉しいです!ツール開発用のAIサブスク契約に使わせていただきます。今一番欲しいAIツールは、Gensparkです♪」
