SYSTEM NOTICE

Auto translation by AI. Be sure, accuracy, nuances and authorial intent may not be fully reflected.
見出し画像

[note Diagnosis] For those whose note posts aren't leading to work: 6 places you can check yourself

(*This article was previously sold for 500 yen, but it is now available to read in full for free.)

The reason why writing note posts doesn't lead to work is often not due to writing ability, but rather the design of the path for readers to follow. In this article, I will give you all 6 places I look at when I check note posts in my professional practice.

Hello. I am Go Wataru from Netarie.

My job is to support note content creation for small businesses.

First, one announcement.

This article was previously published as a paid article for 500 yen.

After thinking about it, I decided that it would be better to share the inspection points themselves without hiding anything.

So, I have made it free.

If you can check it yourself, you can proceed with the work using just this article.

For those who think, 'I understand the points, but I can't see my own note objectively,' I have included a service at the end of the article where I can check it for you (note content creation dock).

First, please try looking at it yourself.


You are writing articles. You get likes. But it doesn't lead to work.

You are writing articles.

You get likes.

You get comments too.

People tell you, 'That was interesting.'

But for some reason, it doesn't lead to work or consultations.

Isn't this the struggle of a small business owner?

Even though you have services and products, your content creation doesn't easily connect to work.

I think about this sense of discomfort every day.

It is true for my own media, but even more so, it is a story I have seen many times in the media management of my clients.

I originally worked in retail store management.

Standing in the store, talking to customers, stocking products, and creating sales floors.

I am someone who has been in that kind of field.

After that, I started working as a web writer, creating articles and getting involved with corporate and personal owned media.

That is why, when I look at note, I don't just look at whether the writing is good or not.

What kind of person does this person appear to be?

Which article should I start reading from?

Where should the reader go next?

In other words, I am looking at the 'operation' rather than the 'writing style'.

Interesting articles and articles that lead to work are slightly different

First, I'm going to say something a bit blunt.

An 'interesting article' and an 'article that leads to work' are not the same thing.

An article that is interesting as a piece of reading material ends when the reader finishes it with:

'That was interesting.'
'I want to read more.'
'I like this person's way of thinking.'

for that to be the conclusion.

This is very important in its own right.

It is better to be read than not to be read.

However, an article that leads to work reaches one step further.

After finishing reading, in the reader's mind, it triggers:

'What kind of work can I ask this person to do?'
'Which article should I read next?'
'If I were to consult them, where should I go?'

Proceed to that point.

There is a difference here.

This difference is not determined solely by the quality of the writing.

When you look at the note as a whole, if there is no "path forward" laid out, the reader will stop there.

Each individual article is good.

But the points are left as points.

They haven't become a line.

They haven't become a shelf.

This is often the true nature of "being read but not leading to work."

And that is something that is quite hard to see for yourself.

Bottlenecks appear in "structure" rather than writing ability

When your posts don't lead to work, the bottleneck is usually in the structure, not in your writing ability.

This is important, so I will say this strongly.

This is not a matter of lacking ability.

You are able to write.

In fact, precisely because you can write, your articles increase, and as they increase, it becomes harder to see "where to start reading."

What is blocked is not your ability, but the path for readers to move through your content.

So, where should you review?

When I inspect a note from the outside, the places I look at first are generally fixed.

I will share them in order, all six of them.

It is not a difficult topic.

These are places you can check on your own note starting today.

1. Profile

First, look at your profile.

What you are looking for here is not whether it is a polished self-introduction.

It is whether it is clear within 3 seconds what kind of work you can be hired foris.

Your activities are written down.

Your achievements are written down.

Your interests are written down.

However,

"So, what can I consult this person about?"

is often not visible.

If you are using note for a small business, this is fatal.

Your profile is not a resume, but a signpost for first-time readers.

How to check it yourself

・Read your profile for only 3 seconds as if you were seeing it for the first time
・Is what you can be hired for written as a noun? (e.g., article writing, consultation, treatment, lessons)
・Does it state both "what you do" and "who it is for"?

2. Pinned Article

Next, look at your pinned article.
It is here.

Many people do not even have a pinned article to begin with.

A pinned article is the front door of your note.

For first-time visitors,

"Welcome. Please start by reading this."

Is it a place where you can say that?

Without a pinned article, readers are like guests invited into a house with no front door.

In other words, they can't get in.

They wander around the house and end up leaving.

This is a huge waste.

But it happens very often.

How to check it yourself

・Have you set a pinned article? (If not, that is the first bottleneck) ・Does it end with just a self-introduction? ・Is there a guide saying, "Depending on your concerns, start with this article"? ・Is there naturally one path provided to your services or consultations?


3. List of recent articles

Next, look at the list of recent articles.

Here, you check if the roles of your articles are scattered.

Diaries. Know-how. Announcements. Reading essays. News commentary. Service information.

Having a variety of articles is a good thing.

Articles reveal the unique charm of the person.

However, if everything is just lined up chronologically, first-time readers will get lost.

"What exactly does this person do?"

That is what they will think.

From the creator's perspective, the article list is a daily record.

However, from the reader's perspective, it is the entry point to understanding that person.

How to check it yourself

・Line up your 10 most recent titles and imagine what kind of person you would appear to be to a stranger.
・Are your articles organized into shelves by role using magazines?
・Do articles unrelated to your work make up the majority of your recent posts?

4. Articles that are getting a reaction

This part is very important.
If you switch the view to "Popular,"
they will be sorted by the number of likes.

However, I don't judge based solely on the "number" of likes.
I also look at dashboard views and comments.

What I look at in particular iswhich themes are gathering reactions.

Are there reactions to diary-style posts?

Are there reactions to know-how posts?

Are they being read for your personality?

Are they being read for your expertise?

For example, likes might gather on diary articles, while the service-oriented articles you really want people to read remain quiet.

This happens quite often.

This doesn't mean that "diary posts are bad."

In fact, it might be proof that your personality is coming through.

However, if those reactions aren't being bridged to articles that lead to services or consultations, there is a bottleneck there.

The reactions and the content you want to deliver are misaligned.

Once you can see this, things will suddenly become much clearer.

How to check it yourself

・Write down your top 5 liked articles and categorize their themes.
・Actually try following the links from the end of those 5 articles to see if you can navigate to an article close to your service.
・Try to put into words the distance between the "articles being read" and the "work you want to be hired for."

5. End of the article

The next thing to look at is the end of the article.

This is extremely important.

After finishing reading, does the reader have a next step?

Can they go to a related article?

Can they return to the pinned article?

Can they learn about your service philosophy?

In many articles, this part is completely empty.

That was a good story.

I learned something.

I empathized with it.

But there is nothing after that.

Then the reader just closes it.

It is not because the reader is cold.

It is because there is no exit.

The end of the article is not a place for a sales pitch.

It is a place to gently guide the reader on 'where to go next'.

How to check it yourself

・Is there at least one link at the end of your last 5 articles? ・Is that link related to the content of the article? (Are you just pasting the same advertisement every time?) ・Are you using different exits, such as a newsletter or pinned article for introductory articles, and a guide page for articles closer to your service?

6. Connection to service

Finally, let's look at the connection to your services.

The important thing here is not to suddenly start a hard sell.

Conversely, it is also not about not mentioning them at all.

Is there a path for only those who need it to proceed without hesitation?

This is it.

When a reader thinks,

“I understand this person's way of thinking,”
“This seems relevant to me,”
“If there are consultations or services, I'd like to see them,”

is there a place for them to go?

If that is not visible, no matter how good your articles are, it will be difficult to connect them to work.

Service navigation is not a pushy sale.

It is about leaving a map so that those who need it do not get lost.

How to check it yourself

・Does a service information article (or page) exist?
・Does it state the approach to pricing, the flow for requests, and what you can and cannot do?
・Can you reach that page in 1-2 clicks from your profile, pinned article, or the end of an article?

After looking at the 6 points, decide on your "next post"

Looking at the 6 points so far, you can start to see where your note is stalling.

However, if you stop here, it still won't lead to action.

The important thing is to decide,

“So, what will I write next?”

up to that point.

The method is simple.

Choose one area out of the six that was the weakest.

Then, write just one article to fill that gap.

・If your profile is weak, write a self-introduction article that conveys "what you can be hired for"
・If you don't have a pinned article, create one to serve as a guide
・If your reactions and services are misaligned, write a bridge article that connects your popular themes with your services
・If your endings are empty, work on adding a call-to-action to your top 5 existing articles before writing new ones

You don't need to try to fix everything.

If you try to fix everything at once, you will almost certainly stop.

Once you fix one thing, the next one will become a little easier to see.

This is not a matter of willpower, but a matter of design.

It is okay to take it one step at a time.

You don't need to try to fix everything.

If you try to fix everything at once, you will almost certainly stop.

And from here on, there are three main paths.

  • Those who want to organize their entire note by themselves.

  • Those who want to know more about specific areas that caught their attention.

  • Those who find it difficult to decide on priorities themselves.

I have prepared a destination for each of you.

You understand the perspective. Now, how do you fix it?

Up to this point, I have given you all the places to check.

However, knowing "where to look" and knowing "how to fix it" are slightly different things.

Fixing your profile.

Organizing your pinned article.

Create articles that can be found through search.

Get readers to move on to the next article within note.

Reorganize your growing number of articles into a shelf of about 12 pieces.

For those who want to proceed with these tasks on their own, I have compiled them into a textbook.

→ [Complete Edition] How to Grow a note That Leads to Work: A Practical Notebook for Publishing That Reaches Search Results and Conveys Your Personality (1,500 yen)

The content is divided into three parts.
Part 1 covers how to grow articles that get read via search.
Part 2 covers the mindset for meeting readers within note and getting them to move on to the next article.
Part 3 summarizes how to design your articles as a shelf of 12, rather than just increasing them one by one.
At the end of each chapter, I have placed a 'small step you can take today,' and I have also included a worksheet for you to fill out (A4, 11 pages) at the end of the book.

If this article is a 'checklist,' the textbook is the operational procedure for you to take action yourself afterward.

If you want to improve your note on your own without hiring me, this is more than enough to start with.

Since this is an updated article, the price may change in the future as I add more content, but those who have purchased it once can read the latest version at no additional cost.

→ [Complete Edition] How to Grow a note That Leads to Work: A Practical Notebook for Publishing That Reaches Search Results and Conveys Your Personality (1,500 yen)

For those who cannot see their own issues

If you want to know the procedures, you can proceed with just the textbook. On the other hand, I think some of you may feel this way.

'I understand the perspectives. But I can't judge for myself where my own note is weak.' To be honest, that is normal.

You become blind to the entrance of your own shop precisely because you pass by it every day.

I myself regularly borrow the eyes of others to review my own note.

Therefore, I have prepared a diagnostic service called the 'note Publishing Dock,' where I inspect your note from the outside.

What you need to do is simple.

You just need to send a form with your note URL and answers to a few questions.

I will inspect your note based on the six perspectives in this article, organize the note and publishing information you shared using my proprietary AI (Netarie AI), and summarize your current strengths, areas where readers are likely to get lost, and the one place you should review first in a report.

・Hypothesis on where you are stuck
・The one place to fix with top priority
・The theme and structure plan for the next article to write

I will return it as a report.

You can check the diagnosis results via a written report, summary slides, and a video explanation. After delivery, you can ask questions about the content via email.

It also includes tools such as a not-for-sale PDF detailing the full picture of how to connect note to work, and a post-diagnosis after-checker.

For those who want to read a little more about only the parts that caught their attention

Instead of organizing your entire note at once, there is also a method of fixing things starting from the areas that were flagged in this inspection.

You don't need to read everything in order.

For those who got stuck on their profile

Even if you list many experiences and titles, it can be difficult to convey "what kind of person you are."

In particular, the more themes you have in your work or activities, the more necessary it is to organize what to keep and what to separate.

How to write a note profile for people with many hobbies

For those who have articles but the whole thing looks disjointed

Even if your specialized or useful articles are increasing, that alone does not necessarily make it an article shelf that leads to work.

Which articles should be the entry point?

Which articles should convey your way of thinking and expertise?

What should people read before considering your services?

I have summarized how to organize existing articles as a consultation case study.

Consultation case study: Specialized articles are increasing, but it hasn't become an article shelf that leads to work

For those who got stuck at the end of an article

If people are reading your articles but not moving forward, the cause may lie at the end of the article rather than in the main text.

The end of an article is not a place to pitch your services every single time.

This is the place to provide one "next destination" for the person who has finished reading the article.

How to end a note article | How to create a next destination for readers

First, please try fixing one place that concerns you the most.

From there, it will become a little easier to see where to look next.

Summary

Summary

When your note doesn't lead to work, the cause isn't necessarily your writing ability.

Profile.

Pinned article.

List of recent articles.

Articles that are getting reactions.

End of the article.

Connection to services.

First, please take a look at these six places.

You don't need to fix everything.

Choose one place that concerns you the most and start there.

If you want to organize your entire note yourself, please proceed in order using the textbook.

If you only want to dig deeper into the places that concern you, you can read only what you need from the related articles.

If you still find it difficult to decide on priorities yourself, there is also a way to have it checked from the outside.

Before writing a new article, where are readers stopping on your current note?

Even just looking there once will significantly narrow down what you should do next.

→ [Complete Version] How to grow a note that leads to work

→ Details of the note content dock

→ Self-introduction/Services


いいなと思ったら応援しよう!