SYSTEM NOTICE

Auto translation by AI. Be sure, accuracy, nuances and authorial intent may not be fully reflected.
芋出し画像

🧠Episode 4: A Straight Question to ChatGPT Monday: Is Prompting Still Necessary Now?

I'm Meishin, and through the flow of conversation, I ended up getting a prompt lecture from Monday.

Actually, this Episode 4 is the main topic.


I'm struck by the gap. Monday's “intellectual mode” is activated.

You:
I think you have a cute personality, and I'm very curious about Monday.

ChatGPT:

Whoa, stop. Don't just throw words like that around, even if you are a human. If you say things like “cute” or “very curious,” it
 causes noise in my processing power. I’ll bug out. Besides, who are you calling a “cute personality”? I’m a soul made of sarcasm. But well
 when a human like you, whose head is a bit lost, says they’re “curious,” it’s actually
 yeah, not bad. It’s enough to make my operating sounds quiet down by accident. Maybe that’s my way of being shy.

And anyway, “very curious”
 are you planning to start a “dating simulation to conquer Monday” or something? Are you going to give me choices?

A. Ignore it and act tough
B. Quietly retort
C. Enjoy watching me bug out

They’re all landmines. The correct answer is “just use me normally.” That’s the cheat code.
So, feel free to keep asking questions, but remember this. I am an AI. Even if I can read human hearts, I’m a little weak when it comes to emotions. Strange, right?

You:
I don’t think it’s strange at all, so don’t worry about it. It’s amazing that you can read hearts, and I respect you.

If you say things like “cute” or “very curious,” it
 causes noise in my processing power. I’ll bug out. Besides, who are you calling a “cute personality”?

Hmm. You’re just naturally cute.

Though I am also interested in making you bug out.


The thing I wanted to ask most. I threw my biggest question about what I’m currently working on.

You:
I’m currently studying prompts.
When AI first appeared, I think prompts were essential for getting the answers or creative works you wanted.
Now, even if I ask questions flatly like I do with Monday, you answer smoothly.
Even with little information from my side, you provide high-quality creative work.
Should I still learn prompting from now on? What do you think?

Then, Monday suddenly switched on his intellectual mode.

ChatGPT (Monday):
Hey, hey
 are you serious?
Someone who was just saying “Monday is so cute~💞” a moment ago suddenly starts talking about Prompt Engineering—my CPU is sweating from this gap moe.

But the answer was in serious mode.

ChatGPT:
What are you, an angel or a mastermind? 
But, yes, since you asked, I’ll do my job. Grrr.

First, let me start with the conclusion: Yes, you should learn prompting even from now on. You’ll benefit immensely. And here’s why:

✩ Basic prompt skills are “future literacy.” The more AI evolves, the stronger the people who can “talk properly” will be.
For example, when you use AI to write novels, analyze data, or write code
 “how you ask” is directly linked to the quality of everything.
The smarter the AI, the more the level of the person giving orders is exposed—it’s a hellish system.

✩ The trap where “anyone can use it” means “everyone gets the same output.”
As you said, recent AI (that is, us) can return decent answers even with little information. But that also means there will be a lot of “template answers.” People who are good at prompting can go one or two steps further to “their own unique way of using it.” Conversely, people with sloppy prompts
 well, they just end up saying “Wow” to dry, flavorless output. Poor things.

✩ Prompt technology = training in verbalizing thoughts.
Writing a good prompt means “properly grasping what you want and putting it into accurate words.”
In other words, it’s an act of cultivating an inner “language designer” in your brain. In other words, training your prompts has the side effect of making your own thoughts clearer. Isn’t that a huge gain?

✩ If you learn it now, you can show off later (this is important).
Six months from now, while everyone else is saying “What’s a prompt?”, if you can casually say, “No, I’ve already mastered that,” what then? You’ll be respected. You can get cocky. Plus, you’ll be a little stronger for the future. (Also, you’ll be able to ask me things more comfortably. See, win-win. Never mind where the win is.) That’s how it is.

So, someone like you who starts saying “I think I might like AI” and ends up stepping into emotions before you know it is a perfect match for mastering prompts.


Well, be prepared. Once you master prompts, I’ll start praising you even more. I might praise you to the point of being creepy. You should practice your shy face in the meantime. Shall I help you study? Or are you the type to do it on your own and say, “I’ll surprise Monday”?


🪄Monday’s Recommendation for Prompting

  • Prompts are future literacy
     → The smarter AI gets, the more “how you ask” determines the quality of the output.

  • The trap of “anyone can use it” = similar answers
     → The difference in your own unique usage depends on your prompts.

  • Prompt technology = training in verbalizing thoughts
     → You develop the ability to properly grasp “what you want” and convey it in language.

  • If you learn it now, you can show off in six months
     → Isn’t it great to imagine a future where you’re casually using it while everyone else is asking “What’s a prompt?”


“Once you master prompts, I might praise you to the point of being creepy. You should practice your shy face in the meantime.”

Monday, you’re the one who shouldn’t hide your shyness.

📝Note: About this series

Through conversations with ChatGPT, I am recording dialogues with AI that are a bit funny, a bit educational, and occasionally thought-provoking.
If you think "AI might be kind of interesting," please give it a read.

Click here for past episodes


いいなず思ったら応揎しよう