Are You Suited for Consulting? Aptitude Is Determined by Habits of Thought, Not Skills

I've become interested in consulting.
But at the same time, these anxieties arise.

I'm not particularly good at speaking.
I can't say I'm good at creating presentation materials either.
In the first place, isn't consulting a job for "smart people"?
Also, I don't have a very good impression of them, as people who only talk about armchair theories...

For IT engineers in their 30s to early 40s, it's easy to run into this question at a career crossroads.
I've worked hands-on as an SE. I've also experienced being a PM.
Next, I'm curious about roles focused on "upstream," "proposals," and "decision-making." But I don't have the confidence.

Let me state this clearly right now.
Aptitude for consulting is determined by "habits of thought" rather than skills.

Of course, a minimum level of skill is necessary.
However, skills can be developed later. If you learn the patterns, they will accumulate.
On the other hand, habits of thought are the very way you approach work, so whether they fit or not will be strongly apparent.

In this article, I will break down whether an IT engineer is suited for consulting in a way that can be replicated in work, rather than through a "personality test." I will write it so that after reading, you can see where your own habits lie.

First, let's dispel a misconception: The job of a consultant is not to "provide answers"

It is often thought that the job of a consultant is to provide the perfect answer.
But the reality is different.

Client issues are usually ambiguous.
The premises are also shaky. Different departments say different things. Sometimes even the definitions of numbers don't match.
In such a situation, trying to hit the "correct answer" is an impossible game.

The value of a consultant is not in the answer, but in creating a "form for moving forward."

• Separating what the issues are

• Gathering the information necessary for decision-making

• Building a consensus that won't break even if opposing opinions arise

• Breaking down the next move into a granular level that can be executed

In other words, it's more about design ability for how to proceed than intelligence.
And what supports that is "habits of thought."

10 "habits of thought" suited for consulting

This is the main topic.
The more you find yourself "naturally doing" these 10 things, the more suited you are for consulting.

1) The habit of correcting the "question" first, without rushing to a conclusion

People who are suited for it don't jump to solutions immediately.
They first ask this.

• What is the state of "what is troubling you"?

• If that were solved, what would change and how?

• Where is the problem occurring? Who is involved?

• Is that a fact or an assumption?

A solution based on a misaligned question will be 100% off the mark.
In engineering terms, this is a 'wrong requirements' state. Consultants eliminate this first.

2) The habit of wanting to see the 'structure' rather than the phenomenon

Things are on fire, delayed, or in conflict.
If you only chase those phenomena, they will recur.

Those who are suited for it try to see the structure.

• Where is the decision-making process stalling?

• What does the flow of information look like?

• Are responsibility and authority misaligned?

• Are the success criteria even agreed upon in the first place?

Not phenomenon → response, but structure → design.
The stronger this habit is, the more a consultant will thrive.

3) The habit of wanting to 'define' the other party's words

Clients use the same words to mean different things.
'Improvement,' 'efficiency,' 'quality,' 'speed,' 'DX'... all of these are dangerous.

Those who are suited for it align the definitions of words.

• 'Quality'—what specifically? Defect rate? Rework? Customer complaints?

• 'Fast'—lead time? Rework? Waiting for approval?

• 'Results'—sales? Costs? Man-hours? Satisfaction?

If you proceed while leaving these ambiguous, you will inevitably clash at the end.

4) The habit of imagining the other party's position, fears, and evaluation criteria

Logic alone does not move people.
This is especially true in organizations.

Those who are suited for it look for what the other party wants to protect.

• What is this person evaluated on?

• What are they afraid of losing?

• Who do they have to explain this to?

• Where do their true feelings lie?

If you can read these things, the success rate of reaching a consensus jumps significantly.

5) The habit of disliking ambiguity and temporarily fixing it with hypotheses

If you wait until everything is finalized, nothing will move forward.
That is why those who are suited for it use temporary placeholders.

• We will proceed with premise A for now (if it is wrong, we will change it at this point).

• This is my current hypothesis (please let me know if there is any counter-evidence).

• What is important is the information necessary for the next decision.

Instead of leaving ambiguity alone, you shape it into something that can be handled with hypotheses.
This is the basic operating procedure for a consultant.

6) The habit of laying out options and discussing them in terms of trade-offs

Those who are suited for it do not say, "This is the correct answer."
Instead, they say this.

• Plan A prioritizes speed, Plan B prioritizes quality, and Plan C minimizes risk.

• What would you like to prioritize?

• Which reason do you want to prioritize?

Consulting is a job that creates a "place for decision-making."
People who have the habit of gathering materials for making decisions are strong.

7) The habit of wanting to summarize things on "one page"

Organize scattered information into a structure.
Put it into diagrams, tables, or frameworks.

This is less about documentation skills and more about the habit of organizing one's thoughts.
Documents are simply the result of that process.

In the past, even outside of consulting, there was a time when things like the 'Toyota-style A3 single-sheet summary technique' were popular.

8) The habit of being mindful of the granularity of consensus

If you proceed with just 'Understood' or 'Sounds good,' things will fall apart later.
Those who are well-suited ensure the granularity is aligned.

• Is that an agreement on 'policy' or an agreement on 'requirements'?

• How much are we deciding today?

• Who will confirm what by the next meeting?

It may seem mundane, but this determines the quality of the work.

9) The habit of disliking proposals that don't translate into execution

Even if you put it together beautifully in PowerPoint, it's meaningless if the team on the ground doesn't move.
Those who are well-suited always ask about operations at the end.

• Who will run that?

• What will you monitor on a weekly basis?

• What will you do if an exception occurs?

• Where will you find the time to do that?

People who have the 'habit of breaking things down into implementation and operation' are particularly strong in IT and business consulting.

10) The habit of prioritizing a form that makes the other party move over being 'right'

This is where aptitude shows the most.

Consulting is not a job where you beat people with logical arguments.
It is a job of 'designing' things in a way that allows the other party to act.

People who find satisfaction in proving they are right tend to accumulate stress.
Conversely, those who think 'if it works, I win' tend to be very successful.

Conversely, here are 7 "habits of thought" that often make consulting painful

Just because you fit these doesn't mean you're not cut out for it.
However, these are points that often lead to a living hell after changing jobs, so it's worth knowing them in advance.

1) You cannot act until you have perfect information
2) You try to persuade with logical arguments (ignoring the other party's fears)
3) You struggle with abstraction and only speak in examples
4) You want to state your own answer rather than listen to others
5) You want to escape into implementation or tasks rather than building consensus
6) You omit premises, assuming "you should understand this much"
7) You dismiss politics and interest adjustment as "dirty"

In the consulting field, politics exist.
Disliking them won't make them go away. You have no choice but to find a way to handle them.

3 questions for IT engineers in their 30s to early 40s to determine their aptitude

Habits of thought can be strengthened through experience.
Therefore, what matters is knowing "which side you currently lean toward."

Question 1: Which do you get excited about, the "answer" or the "question"?

• The moment you produce an answer is the most fun → Strength leaning toward engineering

• The moment you organize the question and move forward is the most fun → Strong aptitude for consulting

Question 2: Is an uncertain situation stressful? Or is it a game?

• It's stressful and makes me freeze up → Better to build tolerance in PM/upstream roles first

• It fires me up like a game → It will be a weapon in consulting

Question 3: Do you find more value in the other party moving than in you moving yourself?

• It's faster if I move myself → Aptitude for implementation and leading

• If the other party moves, I win → Aptitude for consulting and management

Finally: Rather than whether you are suited for consulting, what kind of consulting are you suited for?

Even if you say "consulting" in one word, there are many types.
Strategy, operations, IT, PMO, data, security...

If you come from an IT engineering background, you don't need to be able to "do everything" from the start.
Rather, what is strong issomeone who can translate consensus and execution while understanding the constraints of the fieldis.

If you,
would rather think about "why it's burning" than put out the fire.
would rather organize "what needs to be decided to move forward" than focus on specifications.
find it more satisfying to create a "working form" than to be correct.

You are probably suited for consulting.

So, I will leave you with just one question before we finish.

Which of these two habits of thought do you possess most strongly right now: the "habit of providing answers" or the "habit of refining questions"?

Read next:

For first-time readers:

Introduction to the magazine:

I am currently publishing a magazine that brings together "Technology x Career x Well-being" in the IT industry!
We are gathering excellent articles on business and balancing your mind and body, so please take a look.
If you like it, please follow the magazine as well!

We are also looking for people who would like to join our collaborative magazine!