Possibilities for a New Dialogue in Medicine

I am struggling because I have issues with my vision correction.
I am worried.

In order to improve those issues,
having felt the limitations of being in the position of a consumer or patient,
I have come to want to engage in activities and research to improve vision correction issues,
primarily by having slow and careful dialogues with experts.
I have come to think this way.

While searching for concrete methods to do so,
I learned about Open Dialogue,
and I became interested in it,
thinking that the idea of having the person experiencing the problem,
along with experts and related parties,
engage in dialogue on equal footing
to solve the problems the individual is facing
was a good one.

To realize that vision,
while participating in various study groups and dialogue sessions,
I was looking for experts who would cooperate in improving my vision correction issues,
and at the same time, I was looking for ways to convey the awareness of the issues that had sprouted while living with these problems.

However,
I could not find any experts who would cooperate.

At the root of my thinking is this:

“Is there not a form of medical care—a form of problem-solving—where, without assuming the relationship of doctor and patient or the categorization of disabled and non-disabled, and without labeling the 'malfunction' occurring in an individual with a disease or disability name, for example, the doctor utilizes their professional skills and knowledge as a medical expert, and the person experiencing the malfunction acts as an expert in the struggle of that malfunction, utilizing their experience and sensibilities, so that both parties can work together on equal footing to improve that 'malfunction'?”
This is the awareness of the issue I have.

Rather than medical model versus social model,
I believe it is more important for patients and medical professionals to build a dialogical relationship and collaborate to resolve the malfunction itself that the person is feeling or experiencing.

When I conveyed this to an AI,
it told me, 'I think this is an important point that suggests the possibility of a new paradigm in medicine.'

Perhaps I might get closer to realizing my vision
if I were to put forward a philosophy such as
'Presenting the possibility of a new paradigm in medicine'
or 'Aiming for new collaboration by building a dialogical relationship between patients and experts in medicine'......