The idea that 'White Paper statistics have an infinite scope' is a misconception. Labor and Social Security Attorney statistics are consolidated into '109 indicators' [Verified Map]
Nice to meet you. My name is tetsu, and I run "Gokaku Bansou" (Exam Success Companion), a study support service for the Labor and Social Security Attorney exam.
In this note, I organize the topics that examinees often stumble over using data and primary sources. This time, I have actually counted the overall picture of "White Papers and Statistics" and mapped them out.
"White Paper statistics are too broad to handle"—that feeling is half a misconception.
The Labor Economy White Paper, the Health, Labour and Welfare White Paper, various statistical surveys...
This is a field feared because "the scope is infinite, and I don't know where to start."
However, when you check and organize the statistics targeted in the Labor and Social Security Attorney exam (especially Labor-related and Social Insurance-related laws) one by one using primary sources—
the main points were contained within about 20 government surveys and 109 indicators.
It is not "broad"; it just "looks scattered." If you map it out, the outline becomes surprisingly clear.
Which fields are "dense"? (Count map)
When you arrange the 109 verified indicators by field, the dense areas stand out clearly (see the figure below).
The dense ones are General Survey on Working Conditions (17), Basic Survey on Employment Equality (16), and Status of Foreign Employment (14).
Following these are Part-time/Fixed-term (12), Survey on Employment of Persons with Disabilities (9), and Dispatch (6).
Roughly, labor-related (leaning toward Labor laws) is about 60, and social security-related (leaning toward Social Insurance laws) is about 49.
Here, you can see one "habit."
The dense fields overlap with recent legal amendments and social topics, such as foreign employment, employment of persons with disabilities, part-time/fixed-term (equal pay for equal work), and employment equality.
Statistics are not just "guessing numbers," but a mirror reflecting the "themes currently moving in society."
The real fear of statistics is not the "scope." It is the "freshness" and "accuracy."
I have seen "where they are" on the map. So, why do people lose points?
—It is not the breadth of the scope, but the "numbers themselves."
・Numerical values change slightly every year due to annual updates
・Confusing detailed numbers in multiple-choice questions due to vague memory of "about this much"
・Memorizing last year's numbers from old textbooks or summary sites as they are
Statistics are a battle of "freshness and accuracy" rather than "scope."
That is precisely why accurate numbers based on the latest primary sources are effective.
(Reference) Examples of numbers verified with primary sources
I will list a few indicators that I have actually verified with government-published figures. The trick is to always memorize numbers as a set with their source.
・Unemployment rate: 2.5% (2025 average / Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, Labour Force Survey)
https://www.stat.go.jp/data/roudou/sokuhou/nen/ft/pdf/youyaku.pdf
・Paid leave utilization rate: 65.3% (2023 / General Survey on Working Conditions)
https://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/itiran/roudou/jikan/syurou/24/dl/gaikyou.pdf
・National medical expenses: 48.0915 trillion yen (FY2023 / Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare)
https://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/k-iryohi/23/dl/R05kekka.pdf
・Number of foreign workers: 2,302,587 (end of October 2024, +12.4% year-on-year / Notification of Status of Foreign Employment)
https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/11655000/001389463.pdf
How I ensure "accuracy" (two-stage verification)
This is a point of pride for Gokaku Bansou, so just a little bit about it.
I verify all 109 indicators like this:
・Stage 1: Actually obtain the primary source PDF from government statistics sites (Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, etc.)
・Stage 2: A separate process re-acquires the same source and compares the text and numbers word-for-word (verbatim)
If it says "2.5%," I only adopt it after confirming the sentence in the source PDF where "2.5%" is written.
The idea is to weed out vague memories or hearsay numbers at the data stage—that is the approach.
Summary
・White Paper and statistical data for Labor and Social Security Attorneys can be consolidated into over 20 government surveys and 109 indicators (they are not 'infinite')
・The most extensive areas overlap with recent legal amendments and social topics, such as foreign employment, employment of persons with disabilities, part-time/fixed-term employment, and equal employment
・When it comes to statistics, the key is not the 'scope' but the freshness and accuracy'. Always pair numerical values with their source.
・Eliminate vague memories and last year's figures through verbatim verification against primary sources (two-stage verification)
Instead of saying 'it's impossible because the scope is too wide,' say 'I have a map, I have accurate numbers, and I have the sources.'
If you grasp this, statistics will instead turn into a point you can definitely secure.
───────────────
Thank you for reading this far.
If you found this article helpful, it would encourage me if you could press the 'Like' button (you can press it even if you are not logged into note).
About 'Exam Success Support'
I support studying for the Labor and Social Security Attorney exam in this way, using 'data and primary sources.'
Verified statistics are also included with their sources. It is free to use, so please take a look if you like.
・Web version (free, no registration required): https://goukaku-banso.com
・iOS app: https://t.co/322VxBiZPc