Building a Traffic-Safe Society Through the Standardization of Speed Limiting Functions
🚗 Open Invention & International Proposal
Building a Traffic-Safe Society Through the Standardization of Speed Limiting Functions
Proposer: Master inchacomusho
Format: Public/Non-patented (Open Proposal)
Proposal Date: August 1, 2025
🔷 Overview of the Proposal
This proposal addresses a fundamental structural flaw in automotive speed control—the technical allowance for driving above the legal speed limit—by proposing a new design philosophy that aims to prevent accidents by standardizing speed limiting functions in automobiles.
Furthermore, this is not merely a technical proposal; it is presented as a new social approach that utilizes the persuasive power of poetry and music to bridge the gap between civic sentiment and technological development.
🔷 Background and Problem Awareness
In current commercial vehicles, no matter how advanced the sensors or automatic braking functions are, the cars themselves are often designed to exceed the legal speed limit, and accidents caused by speeding are not being prevented.
This structural design error can be called a 'man-made disaster' caused by poor judgment during the design phase.
🔷 Technical Proposal
✅ 1. Standard Installation of Automatic Speed Limiting Functions
• The vehicle automatically recognizes local speed limits and physically controls acceleration beyond them.
• To accommodate changes in legal speed limits, real-time control using GPS and map data is incorporated.
✅ 2. Introduction of Wi-Fi/AIS-Linked Safety Infrastructure
• Small Wi-Fi terminals are installed in intersections, streetlights, and motorcycles to share location information of other vehicles and pedestrians in transit.
• AI-driven real-time control complements speed regulation and collision prevention.
🔷 Social and Ethical Perspectives
• This design change is a fundamental reform that shifts existing values from 'speed-oriented' to 'life-protecting design.'
• The fact that automobile manufacturers have not introduced speed limiting technology for many years can be seen as ethical negligence regarding safety.
• It is necessary to encourage this shift in thinking throughout society.
🔷 Cultural Approach: Social Awareness Through Poetry and Song
'Car Manufacturers' Negligence' Original Song SUNO ai
This work integrates a story and lyrics. Please enjoy the background through the story, followed by the lyrics.
### **'Automotive Speed Limiting'**
I have been thinking about this for a long time.
Why does no one notice?
Why does no one even question it?
Without any doubt, cars accelerate.
Because that is how they are made.
But I thought,
**What if they were built to automatically limit speed from the start?**
What if that idea had been there at the development stage?
Wouldn't the tragedy have been avoided?
However, no one saw it as a problem.
They said speed was freedom.
They said speed was what was demanded.
Who was it that decided that?
### **"Where Does the Responsibility Lie?"**
What if automobile manufacturers had prioritized safety measures over speed?
What if the development policy had been set to 'protecting lives is the top priority over speed'?
The technology to impose limits existed.
But it was not adopted.
Companies prioritized competition.
The market demanded speed.
No one stopped it.
And even now, cars without limits continue to drive through the streets.
What should change remains unchanged.
### **"The Technology Already Exists"**
But I keep thinking.
By now, technology has advanced even further.
There are car navigation systems. There is Wi-Fi. There is even AI.
Managing speed is possible.
What if a system where cars automatically recognize and respond to speed limits were standardized?
If that became the norm, wouldn't this tragedy stop repeating itself?
Why hasn't it changed yet?
Why don't they try to utilize this technology?
### **"Humanity Must Choose"**
I am merely making a proposal.
Speed is not freedom.
It is a rule to protect lives.
The environment to automate speed limits with current technology is already in place.
Whether to introduce it or not.
It is up to the **automobile manufacturers, passengers, and the general public** to decide.
I am merely asking the question.
What will you do with this choice?
"Negligence of Automobile Manufacturers"
**(Intro)**
A siren echoes in the corner of a dark alley
A tragedy everyone should know about, yet nothing changes
No matter how many times I shout, it fades into the sound
**(Verse 1)**
Speed was permitted, and that took lives
No one doubted it, no one imposed limits
This design flaw continues to run even now
**(Pre-Chorus)**
There were signs, but just looking at them doesn't change anything
Without limits, human judgment wavers
An accident that could have been prevented, why didn't we notice?
**(Chorus)**
We didn't put speed limits on cars
The idea didn't even cross our minds
If we had realized, there would have been no tragedy
Don't repeat it, we don't need any more sacrifices
**(Verse 2)**
Who decided that speed is what matters?
Who stayed silent, claiming this design was right?
Every time we accelerate, a tragedy is etched
Time doesn't turn back, but the future can be changed
**(Pre-Chorus)**
There are signs, but they are meaningless if not followed
If we entrust speed to the car, lives can be saved
Yet no one seems to notice
**(Chorus)**
We didn't put speed limits on cars
The idea didn't even cross our minds
If we had realized, there would have been no tragedy
Don't repeat it, we don't need any more sacrifices
**(Bridge)**
Don't repeat it, we don't need any more sacrifices
A car is not just a vehicle, it is something that holds lives
Apply the limit, now is the time to change the design
**(Outro)**
The shadows of cars still running, tragedies repeating somewhere again
But if this voice reaches, the future can be changed
Speed is not freedom, it is a rule to protect lives
📖 Poem: Excerpt from 'Automobile Speed Limits'
I have been thinking about this for a long time.
Why does no one notice?
Why does no one even question it?
Without a shred of doubt, cars accelerate.
Because that is how they are made.
But I thought,
What if they had been built to automatically limit speed from the start?
Wouldn't the tragedies have been avoided?
With current technology, the environment for automating speed limits is already in place.
It is up to theautomobile manufacturers, passengers, and the general publicto decide.
🎵 Lyrics: Excerpt from 'The Negligence of Automobile Manufacturers'
We didn't put speed limits on cars
The idea didn't even cross our minds
If we had realized, there would have been no tragedy
Don't repeat it, we don't need any more sacrifices
A car is not just a vehicle
It is something that holds lives
Apply the limit
Now is the time to change the design
This poem and song express thatthe greatest barrier was not the limits of automotive technology, but a lack of social imagination.
⸻
🔷 Feasibility and Deployment Strategy
• Technically, speed limiting devices can already be introduced into commercial vehicles.
• The deployment of Wi-Fi access points as public infrastructure can be easily integrated into existing intersection equipment (traffic lights, streetlights, etc.).
• We are also looking at bottom-up change through proposals to automakers, pilot project proposals to local governments, and collaboration with consumer groups.
⸻
🔷 Conclusion: Speed limits are a human choice
This proposal is not just a technological one.
It is a proposal for a civilizational choice regarding'what kind of society we choose.'
Speed is not a freedom.
It is a rule to protect lives, and it can only be realized through the redesign of our automotive society.
Now is the time to change the design.
Future accidents can be prevented through 'innovation'.
📩 Disclosure Classification:
This proposal is released to the world as an open invention. It is free to reference, modify, and reuse.
However, exclusive rights for commercial purposes (such as patent applications) shall not be acquired, and public interest shall be the top priority.
Proposer Information (Proposed by)
• Name: Master inchacomusho
• Proposal Format: Open Design Philosophy
• Proposal Date: August 2025