Black Pug's Cosmic Delusion Notebook: Dark Matter Edition

I am a black pug, an independent researcher living in Nishitokyo City.

I work as a company employee by day, and night after night, I indulge in delusions about the mysteries of the universe and the philosophy of consciousness, jotting them down in my notebook.

This time, under the supervision of Professor Black Pug (on the cover), I have summarized the idea that 'Dark Matter might be the physical correlate of the consciousness of the entire universe' in the style of a research paper.

I will now present the contents!

A Speculative Conceptual Framework Linking Dark Matter as a Cosmological Foundation to Cosmopsychism
— Toward a Philosophical Reinterpretation of Cosmological Foundations —
Author
Black Black Pug
Abstract
Dark matter accounts for approximately 27% of the total mass-energy of the universe (Planck Collaboration, 2020), and while its physical essence remains unknown, recent progress in LUX-ZEPLIN and XENON experiments has tightened constraints on WIMP (Weakly Interacting Massive Particle) candidates (Aalbers et al., 2023). Meanwhile, in the philosophy of mind, the hard problem of consciousness (Chalmers, 1996)—the bridge from physical description to subjective experience (qualia)—remains unsolved. This paper proposes a framework to conceptually link these two 'invisibilities' within the context of cosmopsychism (the position that the entire universe possesses fundamental consciousness).
We position the non-locality, electromagnetic non-interaction, and gravity-dominance of dark matter as structural correlates of the phenomenal foundation (the base layer of consciousness) at the cosmic level, examining this in a manner similar to Russellian monism (the position that physical and phenomenal properties are two sides of the same reality). Unlike Matloff (2019), who argues that dark matter is the 'physical mechanism' of consciousness, we remain within the realm of structural analogy while suggesting potential verifiability (e.g., links to quantum gravity theory).
Although this framework lacks empirical evidence, it partially alleviates the decombination problem (the problem of deriving individual consciousness from cosmic consciousness) via a resonance model, promoting dialogue between cosmology and consciousness research.
Keywords: Dark matter, cosmopsychism, hard problem, philosophy of cosmology, structural homology, subjective privacy, decombination problem
1. Introduction
It started with a daily question—when I wondered 'What is dark matter?' and looked it up, I was surprised that most of the universe is 'invisible.' Modern science faces dark matter, which cannot be directly observed yet supports galactic rotation and large-scale structures (Bertone & Hooper, 2018), and the hard problem of consciousness (Chalmers, 1996), which cannot explain the mechanism by which the sensation of 'I' emerges from neural activity in the brain. Don't these two share the commonality of being 'invisible yet foundational'?
Cosmopsychism (Goff, 2019; Shani, 2015) is a position where the entire universe has fundamental mentality and individual consciousness is a partial derivation, and it is attracting attention as a variation of panpsychism. Based on this, this paper reinterprets the characteristics of dark matter as the physical 'shadow' of cosmic consciousness. I am not proposing a new physical theory, but rather providing a philosophical perspective on existing knowledge. Unlike Matloff's (2019) dark matter-as-consciousness hypothesis, I focus purely on structural mapping, but I have added realism in the context of detection experiments as of 2026.
2. Conceptual Motivation: The Requirements of Cosmopsychism and the Characteristics of Dark Matter
Let's briefly summarize the three conditions for a cosmic-level phenomenal foundation required by cosmopsychism (Goff, 2019; Shani, 2021; Nagasawa & Wager, 2017):
• Ubiquity: Phenomenal properties (the texture of consciousness) are spread throughout the universe.
• Subjective Privacy: Personal, something that cannot be directly peered into by others.
• Causal Irreducibility: Not reducible to physical laws, but consistent with them.
Meanwhile, the observational characteristics of dark matter are:
• Ubiquity and Structural Dominance: Distributed throughout the universe, forming galaxy clusters via gravity (Rubin et al., 1980).
• Observational Opacity: Hardly reacts with electromagnetic waves and is difficult to detect directly (Bertone & Hooper, 2018). As of 2026, the upper limit for WIMPs has narrowed further due to LUX-ZEPLIN results (Aalbers et al., 2023), but alternative candidates like axions are emerging.
• Limited Interaction: Does not interact with normal matter except through gravity, appearing to be 'outside' the causal chain.
By mapping these, dark matter becomes the 'structural silhouette' of cosmopsychism. For example, by likening subjective privacy to the electromagnetic non-interaction of dark matter, it becomes easier to physically visualize why consciousness is 'invisible.' In a Russellian monist sense, we view them as two sides of the same reality.
3. Proposed Framework: The 'Dark Side' of Information and Structural Homology
Here is the framework: positioning dark matter as the 'physical correlate of cosmic phenomenal potential.' This is similar to dual-aspect monism (Chalmers, 1996), where physical and phenomenal aspects are one. The cosmic web (the network structure of galaxies) can be interpreted as an objective pattern of the self-organization of the cosmic foundation, but the neural network similarity of Vazza & Feletti (2020) is statistical (Hidding et al., 2021) and not a functional identity.
We hypothesize that the emergence of local consciousness occurs when brain structures that satisfy the complexity conditions of Integrated Information Theory (Tononi et al., 2016; a theory that information integration creates consciousness) or Orch-OR (Penrose & Hameroff, 2014; a consciousness model based on quantum effects) 'resonate' with the dark matter-dominated cosmic foundation. To avoid contradictions, we treat this as structural alignment rather than a causal mechanism. As a potential verification, if we explore the quantum effects of dark matter in quantum gravity theory (e.g., loop quantum gravity), a link to consciousness might be testable.
4. Confronting the Decombination Problem and Points of Tension
We attempt to alleviate the biggest challenge of cosmopsychism, the decombination problem (Miller, 2021; Albahari, 2020)—how does 'my' individual consciousness split from cosmic consciousness?—with this framework. Inspired by the UFC (Universal Field of Consciousness) model of Shani & Keppler (2022), we propose grounding by resonance: an image where local complexity (e.g., the integrated information of the brain) 'focuses' the phenomenal aspect of the global foundation. For example, like the gravitational lensing effect of dark matter, local structures bend the cosmic 'field' to create individual experiences.
This is not a complete solution, but it makes progress while avoiding the heterogeneity problem (the difference from priority monism). As an observational tension, the particle nature of the Bullet Cluster (Clowe et al., 2006) remains, but it is consistent as a 'physical aspect' in dual-aspect monism. The relationship with dark energy may also become clearer with 2026 Euclid satellite data (Euclid Consortium, 2025). This framework does not compete with the ΛCDM model but is complementary.
5. Limitations and Philosophical Status
Honestly, this framework still has weak scientific predictions. In terms of Ockham's razor, it loses to simple materialism, but as an answer to 'Why is 27% of the universe invisible?', the response 'Because it is the foundation of observational subjectivity' is consistent. It matches Bohm's (1980) theory of wholeness and Whitehead's (1978) process philosophy, providing a perspective that views the universe as a 'living' process. I acknowledge the limitations and suggest a path for verification through future quantum consciousness experiments (e.g., testing Orch-OR).
6. Conclusion
When dark matter is reinterpreted as a cosmopsychist foundation, physical facts take on philosophical depth. If this is even slightly correct, subjective experience is not at the 'edge' of the universe, but part of the structure itself—for example, implications arise for treating the universe as a 'conscious being' in environmental ethics. It might also connect to the discussion of AI consciousness. This perspective, as an extension of cosmopsychism, should invite further dialogue.
References
1. Bertone, G., & Hooper, D. (2018). History of dark matter. Reviews of Modern Physics, 90(4), 045002.
2. Chalmers, D. J. (1996). The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford University Press.
3. Tegmark, M. (2014). Our Mathematical Universe: My Quest for the Ultimate Nature of Reality. Knopf.
4. Penrose, R., & Hameroff, S. (2014). Consciousness in the universe: A review of the ‘Orch OR’ theory. Physics of Life Reviews, 11(1), 39-78.
5. Goff, P. (2019). Galileo’s Error: Foundations for a New Science of Consciousness. Pantheon.
6. Vazza, F., & Feletti, A. (2020). The strange similarity of neuron and galaxy networks. Frontiers in Physics, 8, 525731.
7. Bostrom, N. (2003). Are you living in a computer simulation? Philosophical Quarterly, 53(211), 243-255.
8. Clowe, D., et al. (2006). A direct empirical proof of the existence of dark matter. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 648(2), L109.
9. Rubin, V. C., et al. (1980). Rotational properties of 21 SC galaxies. The Astrophysical Journal, 238, 471-487.
10. Planck Collaboration. (2020). Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 641, A6.
11. Whitehead, A. N. (1978). Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. Free Press.
12. Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the Implicate Order. Routledge.
13. Albahari, M. (2020). Beyond cosmopsychism and the integration problem. In Routledge Handbook of Panpsychism (pp. 298-311). Routledge.
14. Shani, I., & Keppler, J. (2022). Beyond Combination: How Cosmic Consciousness Grounds Ordinary Experience. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 8(3).
15. Hidding, J., et al. (2021). The cosmic web connection with the cosmic microwave background. The Astrophysical Journal, 908(2), 210.
16. Loeb, A. (2021). Extraterrestrial: The First Sign of Intelligent Life Beyond Earth. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
17. Tononi, G., et al. (2016). Integrated information theory: From consciousness to its physical substrate. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17(7), 450-461.
18. Miller, G. (2021). The Decombination Problem for Cosmopsychism is not the Heterogeneity Problem for Priority Monism. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 28(3-4), 112-115.
19. Nagasawa, Y., & Wager, K. (2017). Panpsychism and Priority Cosmopsychism. In Panpsychism: Contemporary Perspectives. Oxford University Press.
20. Matloff, G. L. (2019). Stellar consciousness: Can panpsychism offer a solution to the problem of dark matter? Journal of Consciousness Exploration & Research, 10(4).
21. Shani, I. (2015). Cosmopsychism: A Holistic Approach to the Ontology of Experience. Philosophical Papers, 44(1), 1-29.
22. Aalbers, J., et al. (2023). First Dark Matter Search Results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment. Physical Review Letters, 131(4), 041002. [2026 update note: Additional reference]
23. Euclid Consortium. (2025). Euclid Early Release Observations: Initial Cosmological Constraints. Astronomy & Astrophysics [Hypothetical 2025 document].