Just by Speaking to Someone—Unraveling the Structure of 'Being Isolated Despite Doing Nothing Wrong'
Jealousy destroys invisible relationships
One day, A spoke to a person named B, just as anyone would.
That was all. They just exchanged words and had a casual interaction.
However, C, who was watching, began to stir up trouble behind A's back.
C pressured B, saying, "I don't want you to talk to A."
C interfered by saying, "What kind of person is A? You should be careful."
At that moment, even though A had done nothing wrong—
for some reason, within the atmosphere of the situation, A was quietly alienated.
What jealousy destroys is the 'freedom of relationships'
Situations like this happen often in workplaces, schools, and on social media.
The point is this:
• A just spoke to B normally.
• C, seeing this, felt 'jealousy' or 'anxiety'.
• Then, C projected those emotions onto A or B.
• As a result, the relationship with B became awkward, and A ended up having to distance themselves.
In other words,C's internal issues intervene in the relationship between A and B.
Moreover, those 'emotions' are often not based on valid reasons, but are merely anxiety or possessiveness.
A is not at fault, yet A is isolated.
Logically speaking, A has done nothing wrong.
Talking to people is a free action permitted to everyone.
But in reality, it doesn't work that way.
• Should I 'read the room' and distance myself?
• Should I withdraw from the relationship to 'avoid misunderstandings'?
• Should I erase myself because I 'don't want to get involved in trouble'?
…and so, A begins a process ofrestraintknown asself-erasure.
Then, the person who 'expresses emotions strongly' becomes the ruler of the situation,
and the person who 'behaves quietly' is excluded from the space.
How should we face the violence of emotions?
Emotions do not disappear even if you deny them.
However, that does not mean those emotions should become a 'reason to restrict the actions of others'.
For example, it is possible to say this:
"I understand that you feel anxious. But I have my own relationships."
This stance isan attitude of understanding emotions without yielding to them.
• I empathize.
• But I do not surrender my sovereignty.
That is not 'coldness'.
Rather, it is ahealthy boundaryto respect both yourself and others.
Why do 'kind people' end up isolated?
Ironically, the ones who end up isolated in these situations
are usually 'people who can consider others' emotions' and 'calm, rational people'.
• Everyone is careful around people who yell violently because they cannot be ignored.
• Someone will comfort a person who starts crying emotionally.
• But those who are quietly hurt leave without anyone noticing.
That is a structural bug in this society,
and a perverse logic of the situation where 'the intensity of emotion becomes justice'.
Conclusion: To avoid choosing isolation
If you are ever placed in a position like A,
I want you not to blame yourself.
Emotions sometimes have the power to bind others.
But you do not need to yield to that and give up your freedom.
• Be considerate, but do not submit.
• Empathize, but do not let them cross your boundaries.
That is what it means toprotect your dignity.
Even if you are not understood,
even if you feel a little lonely,
that stance will prove yourrighteousness.
Click here for other articles related to this one ▼
いいなと思ったら応援しよう!
応援よろしくお願いします!いただいたチップは研究費用に回します。