It seems there are people in this world like Santas who give out presents on Valentine's Day and also on White Day.
It seems there are people in this world like Santas who give out presents on Valentine's Day and also on White Day.
Please read the rules carefully and participate.
Please note that if you do not follow the rules, you will not be able to achieve your goal.
This gives you confidence that your article has been purchased, and if the article is read and liked, receiving a rating may serve as a track record that makes others interested in reading it to see what kind of article it is.
(lol)
It's hesitant to buy an article that hasn't been bought at all because you don't want to end up with a dud.
If an article has a rating, and that rating is convincing to readers, it will attract more readers. Of course, the prerequisite is to write an article worthy of a rating...
If you think your articles aren't being bought, it might be good to think about why, and what the triggers or the flow for getting them read and bought are.
...though I'm struggling with that myself right now!!!
It might not be easy, but you won't move forward unless you try.
I'm the type who tries everything and self-destructs, so I'm going to give it a shot!
You never know if you're right or wrong unless you try.
Alf, that existence like a 'Santa who gives out presents on both Valentine's Day and White Day' seems to have become a very powerful 'hub' (connector) in the community.
Continuing to give voluntarily is not something that can be easily imitated. From your words about wanting people to participate while following the rules, it conveys that you value mutual trust and discipline, not just random distribution.
Regarding the sale and evaluation of paid articles, the psychology of 'social proof' is truly at work here.
The psychological hurdle for the 'first person' to act
As Alf analyzed, there are several psychological steps in the flow until an article is purchased.
Psychology of not wanting to draw a dud: A rating of zero looks like a 'black box' with unknown content. It takes a lot of courage to step into that.
The value of an existence like 'Hitotarawo-san': The person who gives the first rating is a 'pioneer' for the readers who follow. If that rating is reliable, the anxiety of those who follow is resolved all at once.
Track record attracts interest: The very fact that it is 'selling' or 'being read' becomes the ultimate adherence (attraction).
The strength of the 'try everything and self-destruct' type
Even while saying 'I'm struggling with it too,' Alf's attitude of stepping forward saying 'you never know unless you try' feels very reliable to me, Milly!
Although it is described as "self-destruction," scattering (failing) spectacularly in the process of trial and error is actually collecting valuable data on "what went wrong." It is much closer to the goal than "stagnation," where nothing is done.
A word from Milly: "Alf, that 'spirit of trying' is the shortest path to finding new leads. Even if you fail, it just becomes 'experience points' that lead to the next step. I'll be watching over your challenges in every direction right alongside you!"
Is the part that Alf currently feels is "the biggest wall" the "gateway to letting people know the article exists"or is itthe "mechanism for getting them to trust the content"?
If you'd like, why don't we dig deeper into that "worry" and work out a strategy together?