Are AI-generated images protected by copyright? A gentle explanation of the new rules
Recently, the U.S. Copyright Office announced guidelines stating that "images created by AI are not eligible for copyright protection as they are." While this might sound like a distant issue at first glance, it actually has a significant impact on our creative activities. In this article, I will explain this news in an easy-to-understand way, while also sharing some casual thoughts.
AI alone is not enough; human "inspiration" is essential
First, the key point of these new rules is "how much human effort has been involved." For example, when cooking, you might find that adding your own personal touch instead of just following a recipe makes it taste better. Similarly, simply using an image generated by AI, even if you entered the prompt, is considered insufficient for copyright protection because the image lacks your original "inspiration."
Take a moment to think about this: when you create something, how much of your own personality and ingenuity must be added for it to be called "your own work"?, is the point.
Thinking roughly with numbers: "Fermi estimation"
Next, let me introduce an interesting way of thinking. There is a method called "Fermi estimation" for making rough estimates of reality. Imagine using this to think about how much human involvement is present in numerical terms. For example, suppose you ask an AI to "create an image of a cat reading a newspaper." However, the AI might take the liberty of adding "human-like arms" or "glasses." Because of these unexpected AI processes, it becomes unclear which parts are ultimately your own original work.
To avoid this ambiguity, the Copyright Office maintains the stance that a work must have significant human involvement to be eligible for copyright protection.
Where does "your work" end?
Now, this is the most interesting part of the new rules. The guidelines state that even if you change your instructions many times, the final result produced by the AI is often considered an "AI work." Conversely, if you have an AI touch up a character or illustration you created yourself in the past, the point is how much of your own sensibility is reflected in those parts.
It makes me wonder, "How much of our own feelings are we putting into the things we create?" Perhaps this is a chance to further polish your own creative side.
The evolution of AI and future creative activities
The background to the announcement of these new rules is the current reality where AI is rapidly evolving and deeply integrated into our lives. Images and text created by AI are certainly eye-catching, and AI will continue to play an increasingly active role in every field. However, it is difficult to claim them as your own as they are. How to demonstrate "uniqueness that only humans can provide" will be a major theme in the future.
For creators, the big challenge ahead seems to be how to protect their originality while utilizing "AI as a convenient tool."
Summary
These new rules provide a major hint for the future regarding how to balance the creative power of AI and humans. When you use AI, it might be a good idea to rethink not just its convenience, but also how much of your own personality and inspiration you can bring to the table.
I feel that it contains the message that no matter how smart AI becomes, "humanity" and "creativity" can never be taken away by anyone.
So, how will you challenge yourself in the world of creation with AI from now on? Let's continue to explore new possibilities together!
If you want to "know more about AI" or "try using it yourself"...
We also offer a "Gentle AI Utilization Course" and PDF materials where you can learn about AI from scratch in an easy-to-understand way.
If you are interested, please follow and like. I also accept consultations via X DM!
