SYSTEM NOTICE

Auto translation by AI. Be sure, accuracy, nuances and authorial intent may not be fully reflected.
見出し画像

[AI & Technology Lab] Claude Fable 5 Returns | Free until July 7. Separate charges from July 8 - A thorough explanation of changes and 'why the limit is shrinking'

3-line summary

  • Claude Fable 5, which had been suspended, returned on July 1, 2026.

  • However, the conditions have changed. It is free to use until July 7. From July 8, it will be subject to separate charges.

  • For those who feel that "the content has changed too"—most of the changes in experience can be explained by the new rules. This article explains the reasons.

Hello, this is EBE.

Last time, I explained why Claude Fable 5 was suspended 72 hours after its release. If you haven't read it yet, you can find it here.

At the end of that article, I wrote that there was a possibility of it being restored. About three weeks later, it has truly returned.

The internet is full of a "welcome back" mood. But that is not what caught my attention.

Is the returned Fable 5 the same as it was before it stopped?


Anthropic says they have "implemented new safety measures." It is certain that something has changed. In this article, I will clearly separate and organize what is confirmed by official announcements, the experience I had while actually using it, and the speculation that is still unknown. As always, verification > atmosphere.


Conclusion first

There are four conclusions to this article.

  1. The money rules have changed. It is free until July 7. From the 8th, Fable 5 alone will be subject to separate charges.

  2. The safety rules have changed. The mechanism to block dangerous usage has been strengthened.

  3. It is true that you feel "the limit is shrinking faster." However, the cause is not the model, but can be almost entirely explained by the newly added "50% limit."

  4. Rumors about identity verification have not yet been confirmed.

I will explain in order.


Change #1: Money rules (most important)

  • July 1 - July 7: If you are on a paid plan such as Pro or Max, you can use Fable 5 at no extra cost. However, you can only use up to half (50%) of your weekly usage limit.

  • From July 8: It will no longer be usable within the plan's limit. Those who want to continue using it will need separate funds (purchased starting from $50) called 'usage credits'.

In short, it's like this.

You can try it for free until July 7. If you want to try it, do it this week.

Before it was suspended, it was the 'top-tier model available within the subscription.' After its return, it is a 'subscription + additional fee premium model.' This is the biggest change before and after its return.

By the way, the original plan before the suspension was to make it paid starting June 23. Because it was only usable for 3 days due to the suspension, the background is that a one-week period from July 1 to July 7 was provided instead. There is growing dissatisfaction on overseas message boards, saying, 'We were told it would be 2 weeks with no limits, but in reality, it became 3 days plus one week with limits.'


Change #2: Safety Rules

The reason Fable 5 was stopped was that ways to bypass safety mechanisms and lead to misuse were discovered.

Regarding its return, Anthropic explains it as follows:

  • Reported bypass methods can now be blocked by over 99% with a new mechanism.

  • Requests judged to be dangerous will not be answered by Fable 5, but by the model one level below (Opus 4.8) instead.

What I'm concerned about is whether this judgment might mistakenly block normal requests as well (i.e., false positives). In the scope of my use for writing articles after its return, I have never seen the switch to Opus displayed. As far as writing articles goes, there doesn't seem to be any impact for now.

If a switch were to occur, I think it would be for security-related questions (such as vulnerability research). However, since most people don't use it that way, there's probably no need to worry. If I notice any switching in the future, I will post an update on X (@EBE_Ryuki).

Also, one practical note: those using it with Claude Code need to update to version 2.1.170 or later. If you 'can't select it even though it's back,' please update first.


'The limit is running out faster'—the experience and the reality behind it

This is the main point of this article.

My experience: What lasted 3 hours ran out in an hour and a half.

I'll state this beforehand: this is not a rigorous experiment, but my own personal experience. There is also a margin of error (since I had prepared what I wanted to research from the day before on the day of its return, the density of my work was higher than usual). I am writing this with that in mind.

  • Before suspension: When working with Fable 5, the usage limit would run out in about 3 hours

  • After return (July 2): It ran out in about an hour and a half

'Did it get cut in half? Did the model change?' I thought for a moment. But when I look into it, a different answer comes into view.

The truth: The bucket size has been halved

Please remember. After its return, Fable 5 came with a new restriction: 'up to 50% of the weekly usage limit' . This restriction did not exist before it was suspended.

In other words, it's like this.

It's not that the speed of the water flow (the model's consumption pace) has changed, but rather the size of the bucket has been halved. That's why it empties in half the time.

3 hours → 1.5 hours. Exactly half. My experience can be almost entirely explained by this specification change alone.


If you see rumors that it has 'deteriorated since its return' or 'consumption has become heavier,' please suspect this 50% limit first. Changes in user experience are not evidence of changes in the model. This is the verification result I most want to convey this time.

To begin with, why does Fable 5 consume so much of the limit?


Apart from the 50% limit, it is also a fact that 'Fable 5 consumes limit quickly from the start.' There are four overlapping reasons.

Reason 1: The limit is counted by 'computational load,' not 'number of times.' Claude's usage limit decreases based on 'how much computation was performed' (the amount converted into money), not 'how many times you talked.' The meter runs on the underlying computational cost, not the number of conversations.

Reason 2: Fable 5 has double the unit price. The price of Fable 5 is about twice that of the model below it, Opus 4.8, making it the most expensive among Anthropic's models. The app also displays that it 'consumes the limit about twice as fast as Opus.'

Reason 3: AI is 5 times more expensive to 'write' than to 'read.' AI pricing is determined separately for the 'amount read' and the 'amount written,' and writing is 5 times more expensive. This is because the computation required to generate text is more difficult. And writing articles is a chunk of 'making it write'. It is a task that uses the most expensive pricing menu the most. My way of using it was the way that depletes the limit the fastest.

Reason 4: It is writing even in places you cannot see. Before the answer appears on the screen, Fable 5 creates a long draft (thought process) in its head. This invisible draft is also deducted from the limit. Moreover, it tends to write longer and more carefully than other models for the same request.

To summarize the four points:

'Writing fast' and 'the limit decreasing fast' are two sides of the same coin. Fast = creating a lot of text in a short time = being charged a lot in a short time.

Fable 5 is a fast but fuel-inefficient sports car. And the meter is running not on the distance traveled, but on the cost of the gasoline used.

A note for Pro plan users (this is a guess)

I use the Max plan, and even then, 50% of the limit was exhausted in an hour and a half. It is said that the size of the plan's limit is roughly proportional to the price. If so, on the Pro plan, there is a possibility that the day's limit will be finished with a single heavy task.

This is my guess. However, for those who are wondering whether to buy credits after July 8, I strongly recommend that you check 'how much your limit decreases with a single task' during this free period. You can check it on the Settings > Usage screen. That is the most reliable basis for your decision.


What changed?: Rumors of identity verification [This is speculation]

There is another topic being discussed. However, this is not confirmed information.

Anthropic will implement a new privacy policy starting July 8. In line with this, there is a view that 'some features may require identity verification with an ID card.' Since the reason for the suspension this time was 'access by foreign nationals,' this is a logical speculation.

However, there has been no official announcement from Anthropic yet. In fact, I have been able to use it normally without being asked for identity verification even after it returned (as of July 2, paid plan). It is possible that it is different for logged-out states or new accounts, but I have not been able to confirm that.

Conclusion: At least for now, it can be used normally without identity verification. I will add an update if it changes in the future.

Do not mix confirmed stories with unconfirmed ones. That is the most important thing I value in this note.


Public reaction

During the suspension, the enthusiasm for waiting for Fable 5 was incredible. Someone created 'isfable5back.com,' a site that only shows whether it has been restored, and many people prepared 'to-do lists for when it returns.' There was even trading on prediction markets about 'whether it would be restored by July 1.'

Immediately after the revival, it was all about 'welcome back.' Reports of restarting stalled projects were lined up.

However, as time passed, calm voices have also emerged. There are criticisms that it is 'effectively a price hike,' and dissatisfaction that both the usable period and capacity are less than originally promised.

And what is being talked about most among engineers is not the performance. It is the lesson that **'AI models can disappear suddenly one day.'** Those who were prepared to switch were mostly unscathed, while those who relied entirely on one model were in trouble. It was a three-week period where the 'dependency risk' I wrote about in the previous article became reality.


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q. How long can I use Claude Fable 5 for free?

A. Until July 7, 2026. For Pro, Max, Team, and some Enterprise plans, you can use it without additional charges up to 50% of your weekly usage limit. From July 8, you will need to purchase 'usage credits'.

Q. How much will it cost to use Fable 5 after July 8?

A. You will consume usage credits (purchased from $50). The consumption rate is the same as the API price, and Fable 5 is Anthropic's most expensive model (about twice that of Opus 4.8). Since the dollar amount used varies greatly depending on the work, it is best to check the consumption per task during the free period.

Q. Has the performance of Fable 5 dropped after its revival compared to before the suspension?

A. There is no solid evidence so far that performance has dropped. According to Anthropic's explanation, the model is the same, and only the safety block mechanism has been strengthened. The feeling that 'capacity is being consumed faster' can be almost entirely explained by the newly added 50% limit.

Q. I cannot select Fable 5 in Claude Code. Why?

A. It is highly likely that the version is old. You can select it by updating to version 2.1.170 or later.

Q. Is it true that identity verification will be required to use Fable 5?

A. At least for now, it is not required. I am on a paid plan and am using it normally without identity verification (as of July 2, 2026). While there is speculation that it might be introduced in the new privacy policy effective July 8, there has been no official announcement from Anthropic.


Summary

  1. Cost: Free until July 7. Separate charges from the 8th. If you want to try it, do it this week

  2. Safety: The blocking mechanism has been strengthened. No impact on article writing so far

  3. Content: No evidence of degradation. The feeling that 'it runs out quickly' can be explained by the 50% limit

  4. Identity Verification: Not currently required. I will add an update if an official announcement is made

The previous 'why it stopped' and this time's 'what changed when it returned.' This series of events is perhaps the first case in history where the issue was not 'how smart the AI is,' but rather 'who can use AI and to what extent.' I will continue to follow this on this note.

See you in the next article.

List of SNS links


Main Sources

  • Anthropic Official 'Redeploying Claude Fable 5' https://www.anthropic.com/news/redeploying-fable-5

  • Claude Help Center 'Manage usage credits for paid Claude plans' https://support.claude.com/en/articles/12429409

  • Impress Watch 'Anthropic's "Claude Fable 5" returns July 1, export restrictions lifted' (2026/7/1)

  • TechnoEdge 'Claude Fable 5 finally returns. The revival festival lasts until July 7, after which even subscribers will need to pay extra' (2026/7/2)

  • PCWorld 'Claude subscribers are furious over Fable's new restrictions' (2026/7/1)

*This article is based on publicly available information as of July 2, 2026, and the author's personal experience. Personal experience may vary and is subject to error. Unconfirmed information is explicitly labeled as 'speculation' in the text.

#Claude #ClaudeFable5 #Anthropic #GenerativeAI #AI #AINews #LLM #AIUtilization

いいなと思ったら応援しよう!