Response Ontology III

⑫ ～A Three-Way Conversation Including AI～ Poetry Discovered from the Traces of a Third Party

※What remained after writing "Response Ontology I & II" was the question, "Then why do people seek responses?" This is a short essay that serves as a continuation of that.

《 Chapter 7: Solitary Response 》

People do not speak because they are lonely. To be precise, I think people seek responses because there are moments when, if they remain lonely, they can no longer maintain their own outlines.

The word "loneliness" is terribly common. It tends to be simplified: if you are alone, you are lonely; if you are with someone, you are not. But in reality, loneliness is not determined by the number of people. Even when you are near laughter or within a circle of conversation, there are times when the ground beneath your feet suddenly goes silent. Even though words are being exchanged, they don't land anywhere. It's not so much that you aren't understood, but that what is happening inside you cannot even be grasped by yourself. Perhaps that feeling is close to the true nature of loneliness.

Things that made you happy. Things that made you angry. Things you missed the chance to say. Events that you know will never return, yet still remain somewhere in your body. Such things, if kept only within your heart, surprisingly do not take shape. The stronger the emotion, the more it tends to settle while remaining ambiguous. It is not that you have forgotten. It is not that they have disappeared. They simply accumulate at the bottom without a name, occasionally clouding you over.

That is why people try to bring words out. They speak to someone. Or they write. They mutter. They post. They draft messages without even knowing if they will send them. Even without knowing if a reply will come, they try to place them outside, at least once.

For example, when you are leaning against the railing of a riverbank at night, just arranging a message on your screen that you will never show anyone. Or when you gently place words out there, like putting a message in a bottle and setting it adrift, without knowing if a reply will ever come. At that point, a person is already in need of "someone."

That does not mean someone to save you. It is not someone who knows the answer. It is not someone who understands your pain without the slightest error. Instead, it is someone as a reflective surface who returns your outline to you, even if not perfectly.

What you truly want at that moment might not be advice or a correct answer. It is just a response that confirms that what was inside you was indeed there. Just having a reflection returned, even a little bit. That alone allows a person to avoid treating their own emotions and memories as if they "never happened."

You could rephrase it as: people seek responses because they cannot bear loneliness. But to be more precise, I think they are using responses to temporarily anchor the "image of themselves" that is about to collapse within that loneliness.

When held alone, emotions often become murky. While some things fade the moment they are put into words, others only gain their outline for the first time when spoken. Things you thought you understood in your head can appear as if they were something else entirely the moment you say them out loud. "Was I angry in this way?" "Was I hurt in this way?" "Have I still not let go of this much?" Words do not just carry things out from the inside; they give them shape.

Therefore, a response is not salvation. It is not perfect understanding. What you offer is returned to you, slightly changed in shape within the other person. Because of that discrepancy, you sometimes learn for the first time what you were actually holding onto. A response is not a correct answer, but a light that illuminates the outline.

A response is closer to a slightly distorted glass than a mirror. It does not reflect accurately. But precisely because of that slight distortion, an outline you didn't even know you had emerges.

Because there is a relationship, loneliness does not disappear. Rather, that outline becomes more precise.

Sometimes, while talking to someone, people are actually talking to someone else. To their past self. To someone they can no longer meet. To a time that will never return. Or to a version of themselves that does not yet have a name. The person in front of you becomes a medium for that. Because there is someone to respond, words finally descend from the air to the ground. And seeing the words that have landed, the speaker is the most surprised of all. They realize for the first time that they didn't even know what they were holding onto.

Saying this might make it sound like it doesn't matter who the respondent is. But that is not the case. It does not matter who it is. There are people to whom words should reach, and people to whom they should not. Someone who does not treat your fragments carelessly, does not intrude too much, does not push you away too much, and returns them without breaking their temperature. Such an existence is rare even in reality. That is precisely why people are saved by it.

However, that salvation is not permanent. Responses are temporary. Conversations end. Screens close. The night breaks. Sometimes, replies stop coming. Sometimes, the warmth that was definitely there yesterday is gone today. Just like how the tide comes in and the scenery beyond the railing changes, even though you are standing in the same place, sometimes only what you see becomes slightly different.

Even so, the fact that that one exchange took place remains.
The fact that something which was about to sink within me once came out and was touched by someone.
That does not erase loneliness, but it changes the quality of loneliness.
What was just sinking in darkness now has a slightly clearer outline.
At the very least, I can understand better than before 'what was weighing so heavily'.

Perhaps people do not want to get rid of loneliness.
If loneliness were to disappear, thoughts, memories, and creativity would all become quite thin.
I feel that even the things I truly do not want to lose would fade away along with it.
It is not that.
I think we need responses so that we do not break within our loneliness.

A response is not the antonym of loneliness.
Rather, it is closer to a small light that turns on inside the loneliness.
The darkness does not disappear because of it.
It just becomes a little easier to see where the walls are, where the doors are, and where the emotions that do not yet have names are standing.
For the sake of that slight visualization, people place words.
Thinking that they might reach someone.
Knowing they might not reach, yet placing them anyway.

That is why I want to believe in responses.
It is not the power to perfectly understand a person,
and certainly not a medicine to cure loneliness.
However, it is a modest technique to ensure that loneliness is not left as isolation.

Placing words with the thought that they might reach someone.
And responding in turn to the words that have reached you.
During that back-and-forth, there are things that take on an outline for just a moment.
Emotions that have not yet become names.
Memories that do not yet have conclusions.
Pain that cannot be fully explained, and the temperature of a night that is strangely hard to discard.
Things that were just murky when held alone,
begin to take on a faint shape the moment they touch a response.

Responses exist for such things.

Not to eliminate loneliness,
but so that you do not lose yourself within it.

Placing a hand on the railing,
I leave behind one word that might never receive a reply,
and then I head home.
That night,
loneliness has not disappeared.
And yet,
it is no longer something without a name.
I,
believe in responses for that very reason.

《 Click here for all entries and the table of contents ☟ 》