SYSTEM NOTICE

Auto translation by AI. Be sure, accuracy, nuances and authorial intent may not be fully reflected.
見出し画像

The Illusion of Catalog Specs: The Shocking Truth Revealed by a Misunderstanding from Mr. N

Introduction: A LINE Notification Clearing Up a Misunderstanding

The day after I posted a blog entry about my usual "struggles of EV life," a LINE notification sound rang out on my smartphone.
The sender was... the owner of that quiet voice, "Mr. N."
(I didn't think he even read my blog... why?)

"It seems there is a slight misunderstanding regarding the cruising range."

Along with that single sentence, he sent me the official catalog specifications for the BMW i7 M70 xDrive.
Instead of the "300 km" I had believed in, it clearly stated "488–560 km"!

At that moment, lightning struck in my head. "Oh, the foolishness of being seduced by the devil's whisper and not even reading the catalog..."


A Shocking Rediscovery of Specs

Reading the catalog specs he sent over again, I faced the embarrassing fact that I "knew absolutely nothing about the car I had purchased."

Cruising Range (WLTP mode): 488–560 km
*A huge difference from the 300 km I had assumed!

Maximum Output: 485 kW (659 PS)
Maximum Torque: 1,015 Nm
0-100 km/h Acceleration: 3.7 seconds
*Numbers a 63-year-old clunker of a guy like me can't handle

Top Speed: 250 km/h (electronically controlled)
*Where would I even reach that speed... I'd lose my license

Vehicle Weight: approx. 2,695 kg
*I'll admit this one, I did think it felt "incredibly heavy" when I drove it



Where did "300 km" come from?

Now, the question is why I was so convinced of the "300 km" figure. After thinking about it, I remembered a conversation from the day of delivery.

Mr. N: "You can drive nearly 500 km on a full charge." (in his usual quiet voice)
Me: "Huh? How many kilometers?" (I couldn't hear him)
Mr. N: "...300 km is easy." (Perhaps he wanted to simplify the conversation)
Me: "300 km? I see." (That was all I heard)

And thus, the "300 km myth" was born within me.
To think this was just a "mishearing by a clunker of an old man"...


The Gap Between Catalog and Reality

However, while writing an apology email to Mr. N, I suddenly thought,
"But I still feel like it only lasts about 300 km in actual driving..."

Looking back at my records for the month:

  1. Full charge display: approx. 530 km

  2. Air conditioning ON: -30km immediately

  3. High-speed driving: -100km more

  4. Hills: -50km

  5. Anxiety about the "what-ifs": -50km

As a result, the "usable cruising range" is about 300km. Perhaps my assumptions were not wrong.
My assumptions might not have been wrong after all.

Just as I was about to reply, "Mr. N, the catalog is correct, but it's different in real life," lightning struck me once again.

I heard Mr. N's voice in my head saying, "If you write things like that, EVs won't sell!"


0-100km/h acceleration in 3.7 seconds and a 63-year-old man

Now, the catalog sent by Mr. N had other surprising numbers. A transcendent spec of "0-100km/h acceleration in 3.7 seconds."

The moment I saw this, what came to mind was:

"Even if Michael Jackson, the Moonwalker, had lived to be 63, he wouldn't have been able to dance that smooth dance."

Similarly, is there any situation where a 63-year-old like me could master this "3.7-second" performance? The answer is no. A strong no.

If I were to try and challenge the sports car next to me at a traffic light, saying, "Watch this, youngster!", I can only see a future where I definitely hurt my neck. No, before that, I would hear my wife screaming, "What are you doing!?"



Top speed of 250km/h and speed limits

The catalog also says "top speed 250km/h." Places in Japan where you can legally reach this speed: everyone, let's say it together... "There aren't any!"

If I had to force an answer, maybe "Fuji Speedway"? But when I imagine myself at 63 driving an i7 at 250km/h there... I can only picture an ambulance and a tow truck on standby.

Thinking about it calmly like this, perhaps what I am looking for in an i7 is not "glamorous catalog specs" but "transportation to the Aeon mall."


Reply to Mr. N

In the end, I replied to Mr. N on LINE as follows

I have reviewed the catalog specifications. Thank you for introducing such a wonderful car.
However, I assume the 488–560 km range is a figure based on ideal conditions. In actual use, it will vary depending on the air conditioning, driving style, and road conditions. But I am quite satisfied.
Still, a 0-100 km/h acceleration of 3.7 seconds... I feel like I want to try it, but I'm also a bit scared...

Then, a LINE reply came immediately:
Please, do try the acceleration experience once.
I will ride along in a safe place.

Thinking about where this 'safe place' might be gives me chills.
Is it Fuji Speedway, or perhaps a highway in the middle of the night...?

Will the next blog title be 'Going with Mr. N! A 63-Year-Old's First 3.7-Second Experience'? Or perhaps 'Reporting from the Hospital: The Story of an Old Man's Neck Broken in 3.7 Seconds'?



Conclusion: The EV Owner's Code

Lessons learned from this incident

  1. Read the catalog thoroughly before buying a car

  2. Be careful not to mishear people with quiet voices

  3. Understand that catalog specs and practical performance are different things

  4. A 3.7-second acceleration is not a 'usable weapon' for a 63-year-old man

  5. The distance to the nearest Aeon is more important than the top speed

In the end, the punchline is that the 'truth of the 300 km range' for me was just a number I had assumed on my own.
However,
I feel that the figure of 300 km was not actually wrong in terms of real-world usage.

And above all, thanks to this 'misunderstanding,' I have connected with Mr. N again. It seems my car history will continue to be accompanied by the 'whispers of the devil with a quiet voice'.


Next Preview: 'Mr. N Rides Along! The Tragedy That Occurred During the 3.7-Second Acceleration Experience'

いいなと思ったら応援しよう!

恋愛リペア・アカデミー 夫婦関係は“突然壊れる”わけではありません。 気づかないうちに積み重なった小さな無視やズレが、ある日「もう無理」に変わります。 今回の話が「ただの他人事」に見えない人は、少し立ち止まってみてください。