[Mega Bank (Corporate Sales) -> Securities Firm (Investment Banking IBD) -> Startup (PMI) Career: Oni] [Archived Edition] Improving Monthly CF through "Refinancing" of Existing Loans—5 Negotiation Tactics Reverse-Engineered by a Former Mega Bank Employee from Actual Negotiation Scenes

This time, I will introduce the fourth article by "Oni-san."
I would be happy if you could also check out my self-introduction article.

Thank you for reading!

My name is "Oni," and I have worked in corporate lending at a mega bank, supported M&A and fundraising via stocks and corporate bonds at a securities firm, and been involved in PMI and new business development at an operating company.
I hope to keep my X account active in the future, so I would be happy if you could follow me!
https://x.com/oni_oni_0202

When small and medium-sized business owners face cash flow difficulties, the first option they often reach for is"new borrowing."However, "refinancing," which involves reviewing existing loan terms, is the best way to fundamentally improve cash on hand, yet there is surprisingly little information that systematically explains how to proceed with it.

In this article, based onpractical knowledge gained through refinancing support for IT and SES companies,I will specifically explain how banks evaluate refinancing and what documents should be presented and how.

Why is "refinancing" difficult?—Understanding the bank's logic

Refinancing is the restructuring of existing loans under different terms (such as extending the repayment period).
For companies, it is a powerful tool to reduce monthly repayment burdens and secure liquidity. However, from the bank's perspective, there are circumstances that make them cautious about refinancing.

The risk of being treated as a "conditional change" for existing loans

When an existing lender agrees to extend the repayment period or revise interest rate terms, it can internally be classified as a loan with relaxed terms, making it prone to cautious screening.
However, if a highly feasible business improvement plan is recognized, it will not necessarily be treated unfavorably across the board.

In short, a conditional changecan affect the debtor classification and the bank's internal assessment,which is why banks are cautious.

The problem of not seeing "grounds for repayment"

For new loans, it is easy to build a logic that "this investment will generate future returns."
Refinancing is easily seen as a backward-looking request, such as "we are struggling now, so please lower the monthly payment," and if the logic answering the question "then how will you repay it in the future?" is weak, the screening will not pass.

In other words, to succeed in refinancing, it is essential to have a presentation design thattransforms a backward-looking request into a forward-looking growth story.

1. Create the "use of funds story" for refinancing in a two-layer structure

What banks value most in loan screening is the "use of funds."
In the case of refinancing, the superficial use of funds is "repayment of existing loans," but this alone will not pass the screening.

It is necessary to design the use of funds in a two-layer structure.

First layer: The mechanism of releasing funds through refinancing

Clearly state the cash generated on hand by reducing the monthly repayment amount.
For example, show the direct effect of refinancing in numbers, such as "monthly repayments will be reduced from XX yen to XX yen, creating an investment capacity of XX yen per month."

Second layer: Reallocation of released cash to growth

Describe specifically which business investments the surplus created in the first layer will be allocated to.
Just like "covering recruitment costs (referral fees and training costs) and upfront personnel expenses," break it down to the level of specificity of"who, when, and at what cost" will be hired and "when and how much sales"they will contribute to.

In actual refinancing support cases, we incorporated a chain logic into the second layer: 'In-house production through full-time hiring → reduction of outsourcing cost ratio → improvement of gross profit margin.' By positioning refinancing not merely as a change in repayment terms but as a 'starting point for profit structure reform,' we created a context that makes it easier for bank credit officers to get internal approval.

2. Repayment terms: 'Present high from the very beginning'—Negotiation tactics reverse-engineered from DSCR

The most important thing in setting refinancing terms is not to set the initial proposed terms conservatively.
Many SME owners think, 'I should start with terms that are easy to pass,' and initially propose modest repayment periods and amounts.
However, this is a major strategic error in negotiation.

Once terms are proposed, they are fixed as 'numbers the company said itself,' making subsequent negotiations for better terms (extending the period or lowering interest rates) almost impossible.
The principle for refinancing terms is to calculate backward from repayment capacity (DSCR: Debt Service Coverage Ratio) and present the maximum value first.
The DSCR formula is simple.

DSCR = Simple CF (Ordinary Profit + Depreciation + Interest Paid) ÷ Annual Repayment Amount

The benchmark for DSCR that banks consider a safe zone is generally 1.2 to 1.5 times or higher.
We calculate backward from the projected ordinary profit for the planning period to derive the 'maximum repayment period that can maintain a DSCR of 1.2 times' and present that as the initial negotiation term.

For example, in one case, based on the fact that the simple CF projection for the 8th term was approximately 23 million yen, we derived the theoretical repayment period by setting the annual repayment amount while ensuring a DSCR of 1.2 times.
We designed a negotiation flow where we presented this figure as a 'consultation-based desired term' and adjusted the conditions step-by-step if the bank showed reluctance.

What is important is to always attach numerical evidence to the proposed terms.
High terms without evidence are 'selfish,' but high terms shown with DSCR calculations become 'reasonable requests.'

3. Management improvement plans should start with 'proof of V-shaped recovery'—Design for explaining deficit periods

Many companies applying for refinancing have experienced a period of deteriorating performance recently. Whether the bank views that deficit as a 'structural problem' or a 'transient event' significantly changes the conclusion of the review.

The most important thing in explaining the deficit period is to prove 'why it won't happen again' rather than 'why it became a deficit'.
An effective structure is as follows.

Attribute the cause of the deficit to 'identifiable external events'

Clearly state that it was a transient factor with low reproducibility, such as 'a sharp drop in sales due to the termination of a contract with one major client' or 'unexpected cost hikes.'

Structural management failures (e.g., lax cost management, loss of competitiveness of main products) are fatal if listed without countermeasures.

Show the 'speed' and 'scale' of the V-shaped recovery with numbers

If the company achieves profitability in the term following the deficit and the scale exceeds that before the deficit, it becomes easier for the bank officer to judge it as 'transient.'

In an actual case, after recording a large transient deficit in the 6th term, we placed the achievement of 2.4 times the sales and a return to profitability in the 7th term at the beginning as 'evidence of a V-shaped recovery'.

Structurally explain the improvement points of the current profit structure

If you organize and show what measures are being taken against the vulnerabilities that caused the deficit (e.g., dependence on specific customers, high-cost structure of outsourcing expenses) in four quadrants: 'Human Resources,' 'Revenue,' 'Cost,' and 'Finance,' it becomes easier for the bank officer to transcribe into the approval document.

4. Financial simulations should be broken down to the 'monthly' level—The blind spot of annual plans

The biggest doubt a bank has is the concern that 'even if the year-end figures are good, the funds might run out in the middle of the year.'
An annual plan alone cannot dispel this concern.

I strongly recommend that you always attach a monthly cash flow plan to your management improvement plan.There are three points that bank officers check most closely in a monthly plan.

1. Minimum Cash and Deposit Level

How many months of monthly sales are secured in cash and deposits at the end of each month?

For IT/SES businesses, three months or more is the general safety level. If there is even one month where it falls below one month of monthly sales, it will be a major negative factor in the screening process.

2. Cash Impact in Corporate Tax Payment Months

Cash and deposits drop significantly in months when interim tax returns and final tax returns are filed.

Whether or not this drop is incorporated into the plan significantly changes the credibility of the plan. Many companies only create annual plans and overlook the bottoming out of cash in tax payment months.

3. Conservatism in Sales Ramp-up

In reality, sales are low in the first month of the planning period and rise toward the latter half. A monthly plan that sets aggressive sales from the beginning of the period loses credibility.
It is important to use actual results or conservative estimates for the first 1-2 months and draw a curve that rises gradually toward achieving the plan.

In actual cases, I created a monthly simulation for three years (periods 8-10) and visualized the cash and deposits divided by monthly sales (number of months) and the achievement rate of cumulative operating profit as'KPI monitoring'.
This allows the bank officer to grasp the post-loan monitoring items in advance, making it easier for the document to be evaluated as one where screening and post-management are designed as a single unit.

5. Design Principles for Simultaneous Application for 'Additional Financing' and 'Refinancing'

When applying for additional working capital financing at the same time as refinancing, it is essential toclearly separate and design the use of funds for each.
The bank's screening officer looks at refinancing and additional financing with the same perspective.

They try to distinguish between 'a healthy case that truly needs additional funds' and 'one that is simply struggling.'The method for separate design is as follows.

Refinancing portion: Consolidation of existing loans + condition improvement

By consolidating existing loans from multiple banks, we aim to reduce management costs and level out the repayment schedule.
This part is discussed in the context of 'financial efficiency.'

Additional financing portion: Clear investment purpose and recovery logic

Show what the funds will be used for, such as 'full-time employee recruitment costs (referral fees and initial training costs) and upfront personnel expenses,' and when and how much revenue it will lead to.
The logic chain of 'additional financing -> increased hiring -> increased active engineers -> sales expansion -> increased repayment capacity' becomes the backbone of the bank officer's approval document.

The application amount for additional financing should be set based ona positive rationale of 'we are borrowing this much because we are investing this much,' rather than a backward-looking rationale of 'we are borrowing because we are short'.
Prove with DSCR that the required amount of funds calculated back from the investment plan and the procurement amount fall within a repayable range—if you take these two steps, the application for additional financing will gain persuasiveness.

The biggest reason refinancing negotiations fail is bringing them to the bank in the context of 'we are struggling, so please help us.'
Banks are not charities. Financing is only executed when there is a basis for recovery. The following three points are common to successful refinancing applications.

1. Explain the cause of the deficit or hardship as a "transient event" and prove with numbers that you are already on a recovery trajectory.
2. Complete the logic showing that the surplus funds generated by refinancing will be diverted to specific growth investments, thereby improving repayment capacity.
3. By presenting a monthly financial simulation, dispel any doubts about "plans that only look good at the end of the fiscal year" in advance.

If designed well, refinancing is a powerful financial strategy that improves monthly cash flow, creates room for hiring and investment, and builds a virtuous cycle of business growth.
If you are at the stage of "thinking about refinancing," please start by working on your fund usage story and DSCR projections.

Thank you very much for reading until the end.
If you are interested in bank loans, refinancing negotiations, creating business improvement plans, or cash flow planning, please feel free to contact me.
I would be happy to have a casual chat first!!

Please also follow me on X.
https://x.com/oni_oni_0202

Also, Tanimoto has actually launched his own YouTube channel!
The first video was uploaded on January 29, 2025.

The first video uploaded this time was created under the title"A Day in the Life of a Funding Consultant".
We also had clients appear in it, packing the video with "real" experiences."real". Thank you to all the CEOs who participated!

Below is the YouTube channel I started on January 29, 2025.
A year has now passed, and videos 2 through 69 have also been uploaded.
I would be happy if you could check these out as well.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXLxrsiPKa_d4FMOtFBPv-A

Also, Tanimoto posts daily on X.
Please continue to follow me on note and X.
https://x.com/arriba0519

Our official website is now complete.
Please check it out here!
You can also make inquiries from within the site.
https://arriba.biz/

I answer questions regarding consultations in the following article.

Please contact me via DM or the inquiry form.

*Please include your name, company name, industry, Facebook URL, email address, etc., when making an inquiry.