Restricted access

Research article

First published online February 12, 2020

Request permissions

Evidence Head Tilt Has Dissociable Effects on Dominance and Trustworthiness Judgments, But Does Not Have Category-Contingent Effects on Hypothetical Leadership Judgments

Jaimie S. Torrance https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0503-2346 [email protected], Iris J. Holzleitner, […], Anthony J. Lee, Lisa M. DeBruine, and Benedict C. Jones https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7777-0220+2View all authors and affiliations

Volume 49, Issue 2

https://doi.org/10.1177/0301006619898589

Abstract
References

Abstract

Previous research has found that physical characteristics in faces that influence perceptions of trustworthiness and dominance have context-contingent effects on leadership perceptions. People whose faces are perceived to be trustworthy are judged to be better leaders in peacetime contexts than wartime contexts. By contrast, people whose faces are perceived to be dominant are judged to be better leaders in wartime contexts than peacetime contexts. Here, we tested for judgment-contingent (dominance vs. trustworthiness) effects of head tilt (i.e., head pitch rotation) on person perception and context-contingent (peacetime vs. wartime) effects of head tilt on leadership judgments. Although we found that head tilt influenced judgments of trustworthiness and dominance (Study 1), head tilt did not influence leadership judgments (Study 2). Together, these results suggest that the context-contingent effects of physical characteristics on leadership judgments reported in previous work do not necessarily extend to head tilt, even though head tilt influences perceptions of trustworthiness and dominance.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Ballew C. C., Todorov A. (2007). Predicting political elections from rapid and unreflective face judgments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 17948–17953.

Barr D. J. (2013). Random effects structure for testing interactions in linear mixed-effects models. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 328.

Barr D. J., Levy R., Scheepers C., Tily H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255–278.

Bates D., Maechler M., Bolker B., Walker S. (2014). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R Package Version, 1, 1–23.

Bee N., Franke S., Andreé E. (2009). Relations between facial display, eye gaze and head tilt: Dominance perception variations of virtual agents. In 3rd International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and Workshops, 2009. ACII 2009 (pp. 1–7). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.

Burke D., Sulikowski D. (2010). A new viewpoint on the evolution of sexually dimorphic human faces. Evolutionary Psychology, 8, 147470491000800404.

Ferguson H. S., Owen A., Hahn A. C., Torrance J., DeBruine L. M., Jones B. C. Context-specific effects of facial dominance and trustworthiness on hypothetical leadership decisions. PLoS One, 14, e0214261.

Grabo A., Van Vugt M. (2018). Voting for a male warrior or female peacekeeper? Testing the evolutionary contingency hypothesis in the 2016 US Presidential Elections. Evolutionary Psychology, 16, 1474704918773267.

Hehman E., Leitner J. B., Deegan M. P., Gaertner S. L. (2015). Picking teams: When dominant facial structure is preferred. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 59, 51–59.

Hehman E., Leitner J. B., Gaertner S. L. (2013). Enhancing static facial features increases intimidation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 747–754.

Kuznetsova A., Brockhoff P. B., Christensen R. H. B. (2013). lmerTest: Tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models (lmer objects of lme4 package). R Package Version 2.0-3. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

Laustsen L., Petersen M. B. (2017). Perceived conflict and leader dominance: Individual and contextual factors behind preferences for dominant leaders. Political Psychology, 38, 1083–1101.

Little A. C., Burriss R. P., Jones B. C., Roberts S. C. (2007). Facial appearance affects voting decisions. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 18–27.

Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2011). Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366(1571), 1638-1659.

Little A. C., Roberts S. C., Jones B. C., DeBruine L. M. (2012). The perception of attractiveness and trustworthiness in male faces affects hypothetical voting decisions differently in wartime and peacetime scenarios. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 2018–2032.

Mignault A., Chaudhuri A. (2003). The many faces of a neutral face: Head tilt and perception of dominance and emotion. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27, 111–132.

Perrett D. I., Lee K. J., Penton-Voak I., Rowland D., Yoshikawa S., Burt D. M., … Akamatsu S. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature, 394, 884.

R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

Re D. E., DeBruine L. M., Jones B. C., Perrett D. I. (2013). Facial cues to perceived height influence leadership choices in simulated war and peace contexts. Evolutionary Psychology, 11, 147470491301100109.

Rhodes G. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 199–226.

Spisak B. R., Homan A. C., Grabo A., Van Vugt M. (2012). Facing the situation: Testing a biosocial contingency model of leadership in intergroup relations using masculine and feminine faces. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 273–280.

Todorov A., Mandisodza A. N., Goren A., Hall C. C. (2005). Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes. Science, 308, 1623–1626.

Todorov A., Olivola C. Y., Dotsch R., Mende-Siedlecki P. (2015). Social attributions from faces: Determinants, consequences, accuracy, and functional significance. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 519–545.

Toscano H., Schubert T. W., Giessner S. R. (2018). Eye gaze and head posture jointly influence judgments of dominance, physical strength, and anger. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 42, 285–309.

Van Vugt M., Grabo A. E. (2015). The many faces of leadership: An evolutionary-psychology approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 484–489.

Witkower Z., Tracy J. L. (2019). A facial action imposter: How head tilt influences perceptions of dominance from a neutral face. Psychological Science, 0956797619838762. Advance online publication.

|

You currently have no access to this content. Visit the access options page to authenticate.