Restricted access

Research article

First published online August 19, 2015

Request permissions

Influence of Perceived Height, Masculinity, and Age on Each Other and on Perceptions of Dominance in Male Faces

Carlota Batres [email protected], Daniel E. Re, and David I. PerrettView all authors and affiliations

Volume 44, Issue 11

https://doi.org/10.1177/0301006615596898

Abstract
References

Abstract

Several studies have examined the individual effects of facial cues to height, masculinity, and age on interpersonal interactions and partner preferences. We know much less about the influence of these traits on each other. We, therefore, examined how facial cues to height, masculinity, and age influence perceptions of each other and found significant overlap. This suggests that studies investigating the effects of one of these traits in isolation may need to account for the influence of the other two traits. Additionally, there is inconsistent evidence on how each of these three facial traits affects dominance. We, therefore, investigated how varying such traits influences perceptions of dominance in male faces. We found that increases in perceived height, masculinity, and age (up to 35 years) all increased facial dominance. Our results may reflect perceptual generalizations from sex differences as men are on average taller, more dominant, and age faster than women. Furthermore, we found that the influences of height and age on perceptions of dominance are mediated by masculinity. These results give us a better understanding of the facial characteristics that convey the appearance of dominance, a trait that is linked to a wealth of real-world outcomes.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

3D.SK. (2012). Human photo references and textures for artists. Retrieved from http://www.3d.sk/.

Bailey A. A., Hurd P. L. (2004) Finger length ratio (2D:4D) correlates with physical aggression in men but not in women. Biological Psychology 68: 215–222. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.05.001.

Batres C., Perrett D. I. (2014) The influence of the digital divide on face preferences in El Salvador: People without internet access prefer more feminine men, more masculine women, and women with higher adiposity. PLoS ONE 9: e100966. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0100966.

Bernstein I. S. (1981) Dominance: The baby and the bathwater. Behavioral & Brain Sciences 4: 419.

Boothroyd L. G., Jones B. C., Burt D. M., Cornwell R. E., Little A. C., Tiddeman B. P., Perrett D. I. (2005) Facial masculinity is related to perceived age but not perceived health. Evolution & Human Behavior 26: 417–431. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.01.001.

Boxer A. M., Tobin-Richards M., Peterson A. C. (1983) Puberty: Physical change and its significance in early adolescence. Theory into Practice 22: 85–90. doi:10.1080/00405848309543044.

Bulygina E., Mitteroecker P., Aiello L. (2006) Ontogeny of facial dimorphism and patterns of individual development within one human population. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 131: 432–443.

Burt D. M., Perrett D. I. (1995) Perception of age in adult Caucasian male faces: Computer graphic manipulation of shape and colour information. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 259: 137–143.

Burton A. M., Bruce V., Dench N. (1993) What’s the difference between men and women? Evidence from facial measurement. Perception 22: 153–176.

Burton C. M., Rule N. O. (2013) Judgements of height from faces are informed by dominance and facial maturity. Social Cognition 31: 672–685.

Carré J. M., McCormick C. M., Mondloch C. J. (2009) Facial structure is a reliable cue of aggressive behavior. Psychological Science 20: 1194–1198.

DeBruine L. M. (2014) Women’s preferences for male facial features. In: Weekes-Shackelford V. A., Shackelford T. K. (eds) Evolutionary perspectives on human sexual psychology and behavior, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 261–275.

DeBruine L. M., Jones B. C., Little A. C., Boothroyd L. G., Perrett D. I., Penton-Voak I. S., Tiddeman B. P. (2006) Correlated preferences for facial masculinity and ideal or actual partner's masculinity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 273: 1355–1360. doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3445.

DeWall C. N., Maner J. K. (2008) High status men (but not women) capture the eye of the beholder. Evolutionary Psychology 6: 328–341.

Fink B., Neave N., Seydel H. (2007) Male facial appearance signals physical strength to women. American Journal of Human Biology: The Official Journal of the Human Biology Council 19: 82–87.

Frisancho A. R., Baker P. T. (1970) Altitude and growth: A study of the patterns of physical growth of a high altitude Peruvian Quechua population. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 32: 279–292.

Gangestad S. W., Simpson J. A. (2000) The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23: 573–587.

Gray J. P., Wolfe L. D. (1980) Height and sexual dimorphism of stature among human societies. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 53: 441–456. doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330530314.

Hayes A. F. (2013) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach, New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Hayes K. E., Wolleat P. L. (1978) Effects of sex in judgements of a simulated counseling interview. Journal of Counseling Psychology 25: 164.

Hehman E., Leitner J. B., Freeman J. B. (2014) The face-time continuum: Lifespan changes in facial width-to-height ratio impact aging-associated perceptions. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 40: 1624–1636.

Hönekopp J., Voracek M., Manning J. T. (2006) 2nd to 4th digit ratio (2D:4D) and number of sex partners: Evidence for effects of prenatal testosterone in men. Psychoneuroendocrinology 31: 30–37.

Jousilahti P., Tuomilehto J., Vartiainen E., Eriksson J., Puska P. (2000) Relation of adult height to cause-specific and total mortality: A prospective follow-up study of 31,199 middle-aged men and women in Finland. American Journal of Epidemiology 151: 1112–1120.

Judge T. A., Cable D. M. (2004) The effect of physical height on workplace success and income: Preliminary test of a theoretical model. Journal of Applied Psychology 89: 428–441. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.428.

Keating C. F., Bai D. L. (1986) Children’s attributions of social dominance from facial cues. Child Development 57: 1269. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1986.tb00454.

Keating C. F., Mazur A., Segall M. H. (1981) A cross-cultural exploration of physiognomic traits of dominance and happiness. Ethology and Sociobiology 2: 41–48.

Keating C. F., Mazur A., Segall M. H., Cysneiros P. G., Kilbride J. E., Leahy P., Wirsing W. (1981) Culture and the perception of social dominance from facial expression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 40: 615–626. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.40.4.615.

Kruger D. J., Nesse R. M. (2006) An evolutionary life-history framework for understanding sex differences in human mortality rates. Human Nature 17: 74–97.

Kuh D., Hardy R., Butterworth S., Okell L., Wadsworth M., Cooper C., Sayer A. A. (2006) Developmental origins of midlife grip strength: Findings from a birth cohort study. Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences 61A: 702–706.

Little A. C., Burriss R. P., Jones B. C., Roberts S. C. (2007) Facial appearance affects voting decisions. Evolution and Human Behavior 28: 18–27. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.09.002.

Mazur A., Halpern C., Udry J. R. (1994) Dominant looking male teenagers copulate earlier. Ethology & Sociobiology 15: 87–94.

Melamed T. (1992) Personality correlates of physical height. Personality and Individual Differences 13: 1349–1350.

Montepare J. M. (1995) The impact of variations in height on young children’s impressions of men and women. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 19: 31–47. doi:10.1007/BF02173411.

Mueller U., Mazur A. (1996) Facial dominance of West Point cadets as a predictor of later military rank. Social Forces 74: 823–850.

Mueller U., Mazur A. (1997) Facial dominance in Homo sapiens as honest signaling of male quality. Behavioral Ecology 8: 569–579.

Muscarella F., Cunningham M. R. (1996) The evolutionary significance and social perception of male pattern baldness and facial hair. Ethology & Sociobiology 17: 99–117.

Parker G. A. (1974) Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour. Journal of theoretical Biology 47: 223–243.

Perrett D. I., Lee K. J., Penton-Voak I., Rowland D., Yoshikawa S., Burt D. M., Akamatsu S. (1998) Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature 394: 884–887. doi:10.1038/29772.

Perrett D. I., May K. A., Yoshikawa S. (1994) Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness. Nature 368: 239–242. doi:10.1038/368239a0.

Puts D. A. (2010) Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior 31: 157–175.

Re D. E., DeBruine L. M., Jones B. C., Perrett D. I. (2013) Facial cues to perceived height influence leadership choices in simulated war and peace contexts. Evolutionary Psychology: An International Journal of Evolutionary Approaches to Psychology and Behavior 11: 89–103.

Re D. E., Hunter D. W., Coetzee V., Tiddeman B. P., Xiao D. K., DeBruine L. M., Perrett D. I. (2013) Looking like a leader: facial shape predicts height and perception of leadership. PLoS ONE 8: e80957. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0080957.

Re D. E., Lefevre C. E., DeBruine L. M., Jones B. C., Perrett D. I. (2014) Impressions of dominance are made relative to others in the visual environment. Evolutionary Psychology 12: 251–263.

Re D. E., Perrett D. I. (2012) Concordant preferences for actual height and facial cues to height. Personality and Individual Differences 53: 901–906.

Roll S., Verinis J. S. (1971) Stereotypes of scalp and facial hair as measured by the semantic differential. Psychological Reports 28: 975–980. doi:10.2466/pr0.1971.28.3.975.

Rule N. O., Ambady N. (2008) The face of success inferences from chief executive officers’ appearance predict company profits. Psychological Science 19: 109–111.

Rowland D. A., Perrett D. I. (1995) Manipulating facial appearance through shape and color. IEEE Computer Graphic and Applications 15: 70–76.

Sell A., Cosmides L., Tooby J., Sznycer D., von Rueden C., Gurven M. (2009) Human adaptations for the visual assessment of strength and fighting ability from the body and face. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 276: 575–584.

Sorkin J. D., Muller D. C., Andres R. (1999) Longitudinal change in height of men and women: implications for interpretation of the body mass index: The Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. American Journal of Epidemiology 150: 969–977.

Sorokowski P. (2010) Politicians’ estimated height as an indicator of their popularity. European Journal of Social Psychology 40: 1302–1309.

Spisak B. R. (2012) The general age of leadership: Older-looking presidential candidates win elections during war. PLoS ONE 7: e36945.

Tiddeman B. P., Perrett D. I., Burt D. M. (2001) Prototyping and transforming facial textures for perception research. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 21: 42–50.

Undurraga E. A., Eisenberg D. T. A., Magvanjav O., Wang R., Leonard W. R., McDade T. W., Godoy R. A. (2010) Human’s cognitive ability to assess facial cues from photographs: A study of sexual selection in the Bolivian Amazon. PLoS ONE 5: 1–10. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011027.

Undurraga E. A., Zebrowitz L., Eisenberg D. T. A., Reyes-García V., Godoy R. A. (2012) The perceived benefits of height: strength, dominance, social concern, and knowledge among Bolivian native Amazonians. PLoS ONE 7: 90–92. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0035391.

Valentine K. A., Li N. P., Penke L., Perrett D. I. (2014) Judging a man by the width of his face: The role of facial ratios and dominance in mate choice at speed-dating events. Pyschological Science 25: 806–811.

Van Dongen S., Sprengers E. (2012) Hand grip strength in relation to morphological measures of masculinity, fluctuating asymmetry and sexual behaviour in males and females. Sex Hormones 14: 293–306. doi:10.5772/25880.

Van Quaquebeke, N., & Giessner, S. R. (2010). How embodied cognitions affect judgements: Height-related attribution bias in football foul calls. ERIM Report Series Reference No. ERS-2010-006-ORG.

Watkins C. (2011) Dominant themes. Psychologist 24: 550–551.

Watkins C. D., Fraccaro P. J., Smith F. G., Vukovic J., Feinberg D. R., DeBruine L. M., Jones B. C. (2010) Taller men are less sensitive to cues of dominance in other men. Behavioral Ecology 21: 943–947. doi:10.1093/beheco/arq091.

Windhager S., Schaefer K., Fink B. (2011) Geometric morphometrics of male facial shape in relation to physical strength and perceived attractiveness, dominance, and masculinity. American Journal of Human Biology 23: 805–814. doi:10.1002/ajhb.21219.

Zebrowitz-McArthur L. Z., Apatow K. (1984) Impressions of baby-faced adults. Social Cognition 2: 315–342.

|

You currently have no access to this content. Visit the access options page to authenticate.