Restricted access

Research article

First published online October 6, 2016

Request permissions

Physical Strength as a Cue to Dominance: A Data-Driven Approach

Hugo Toscano [email protected], Thomas W. Schubert, […], Ron Dotsch, Virginia Falvello, and Alexander Todorov+2View all authors and affiliations

Volume 42, Issue 12

https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216666266

Abstract
References

Abstract

We investigate both similarities and differences between dominance and strength judgments using a data-driven approach. First, we created statistical face shape models of judgments of both dominance and physical strength. The resulting faces representing dominance and strength were highly similar, and participants were at chance in discriminating faces generated by the two models. Second, although the models are highly correlated, it is possible to create a model that captures their differences. This model generates faces that vary from dominant-yet-physically weak to nondominant-yet-physically strong. Participants were able to identify the difference in strength between the physically strong-yet-nondominant faces and the physically weak-yet-dominant faces. However, this was not the case for identifying dominance. These results suggest that representations of social dominance and physical strength are highly similar, and that strength is used as a cue for dominance more than dominance is used as a cue for strength.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Alexander F., Allen C., Brooks J., Cole C., Campbell A. (2004). Reason to believe: Representations of aggression as phenomenological read-out. Sex Roles, 51, 647-659.

Bar M., Neta M., Linz H. (2006). Very first impressions. Emotion, 6, 269-278.

Bettencourt B., Miller N. (1996). Gender differences in aggression as a function of provocation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 422-447.

Blaker N. M., van Vugt M. (2014). The status-size hypothesis: How cues of physical size and social status influence each other. In Cheng J. T., Tracy J. L., Anderson C. (Eds.), The psychology of social status (pp. 119-137). New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media.

Blanz V., Vetter T. (1999). A morphable model for the synthesis of 3D faces. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (pp. 187-194). Los Angeles: Addison Wesley Longman.

Blanz V., Vetter T. (2003). Face recognition based on fitting a 3D morphable model. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 25, 1063-1074.

Brunswick E. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Buhrmester M., Kwang T., Gosling S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3-5.

Campbell A., Muncer S. (1994). Sex differences in aggression: Social representation and social roles. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 233-240.

Campbell A., Muncer S., Coyle E. (1992). Social representation of aggression as an explanation of gender differences: A preliminary study. Aggressive Behavior, 18, 95-108.

Carré J. M., McCormick C. M. (2008). In your face: Facial metrics predict aggressive behaviour in the laboratory and in varsity and professional hockey players. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275, 2651-2656.

Cheng J. T., Tracy J. L., Foulsham T., Kingstone A., Henrich J. (2013). Two ways to the top: Evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 103-125.

Coetzee V., Chen J., Perrett D. I., Stephen I. D. (2010). Deciphering faces: Quantifiable visual cues to weight. Perception, 39, 51-61.

Darwin C. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London, England: John Murray.

Deaner R. O., Goetz S. M. M., Shattuck K., Schnotala T. (2012). Body weight, not facial width-to-height ratio, predicts aggression in pro hockey players. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 235-238.

Donofrio L. M. (2000). Fat distribution: A morphologic study of the aging face. Dermatologic Surgery, 26, 1107-1112.

Dotsch R., Todorov A. (2012). Reverse correlating social face perception. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 3, 562-571.

Eagly A. H., Steffen V. J. (1986). Gender and aggressive behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 309-330.

Facegen Main Software Development Kit 3.1. (2006). Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: Singular Inversions.

Fink B., Neave N., Seydel H. (2007). Male facial appearance signals physical strength to women. American Journal of Human Biology, 19, 82-87.

Fiske A. P. (1991). Structures of social life: The four elementary forms of human relations. New York, NY: Free Press.

Fiske A. P. (2000). Complementarity theory: Why human social capacities evolved to require cultural complements. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 76-94.

Gallup A. W., O’Brien D. T., White D. D., Wilson D. S. (2010). Handgrip strength and socially dominant behavior in male adolescents. Evolutionary Psychology, 8, 229-243.

Geniole S. N., Keyes A. E., Carré J. M., McCormick C. M. (2014). Fearless dominance mediates the relationship between the facial width-to-height ratio and willingness to cheat. Personality and Individual Differences, 57, 59-64.

Goetz S. M., Shattuck K. S., Miller R. M., Campbell J. A., Lozoya E., Weisfeld G. E., Carré J. M. (2013). Social status moderates the relationship between facial structure and aggression. Psychological Science, 24, 2329-2334.

Haselhuhn M. P., Ormiston M. E., Wong E. M. (2015). Men’s facial width-to-height ratio predicts aggression: A meta-analysis. PloS ONE, 10, e0122637.

Hehman E., Flake J. K., Freeman J. B. (2015). Static and dynamic facial cues differentially affect the consistency of social evaluations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 1123-1134.

Henrich J., Gil-White F. (2001). The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution & Human Behavior, 22, 165-196.

Hume D. K., Montgomerie R. (2001). Facial attractiveness signals different aspects of “quality” in women and men. Evolution & Human Behavior, 22, 93-112.

Isen J. D., McGue M. K., Iacono W. G. (2015). Aggressive-antisocial boys develop into physically strong young men. Psychological Science, 26, 444-455.

Jack R. E., Caldara R., Schyns P. G. (2012). Internal representations reveal cultural diversity in expectations of facial expressions of emotion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 14, 19-25.

Jones B. C., DeBruine L. M., Main J. C., Little A. C., Welling L. L., Feinberg D. R., Tiddman B. P. (2010). Facial cues of dominance modulate the short-term gaze-cuing effect in human observers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277, 617-624.

Landers R. N. (2015). Computing intraclass correlations (ICC) as estimates of interrater reliability in SPSS. The Winnower, 2, Article e143518.81744.

Lassek W. D., Gaulin S. J. C. (2009). Costs and benefits of fat-free muscle mass in men: Relationship to mating success, dietary requirements, and natural immunity. Evolution & Human Behavior, 30, 322-328.

Lefevre C. E., Etchells P. J., Howell E. C., Clark A. P., Penton-Voak I. S. (2014). Facial width-to-height ratio predicts self-reported dominance and aggression in males and females, but a measure of masculinity does not. Biology Letters, 10, Article 20140729.

Little A. C., Burriss R. P., Jones B. C., Roberts S. C. (2007). Facial appearance affects voting decisions. Evolution & Human Behavior, 28, 18-27.

Lukaszewski A. W., Simmons Z. L., Anderson C., Roney J. R. (2016). The role of physical formidability in human social status allocation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 385-406.

Mueller U., Mazur A. (1996). Facial dominance of West Point cadets as a predictor of later military rank. Social Forces, 74, 823-850.

Oosterhof N. N., Todorov A. (2008). The functional basis of face evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 11087-11092.

Parker G. A. (1974). Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 47, 223-243.

Pellegrini A. D. (1995). A longitudinal study of boys’ rough-and-tumble play and dominance during early adolescence. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 16, 77-93.

Penton-Voak I. S., Chen J. Y. (2004). High salivary testosterone is linked to masculine male facial appearance in humans. Evolution & Human Behavior, 25, 229-241.

Puts D. A. (2010). Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution & Human Behavior, 31, 157-175.

Rantanen T., Guralnik J. M., Foley D., Masaki K., Leveille S., Curb J. D., White L. (1999). Midlife hand grip strength as a predictor of old age disability. Journal of the American Medical Association, 28, 558-560.

Rhodes G., Simmons L. W., Peters M. (2005). Attractiveness and sexual behavior: Does attractiveness enhance mating success? Evolution & Human Behavior, 26, 186-201.

Schubert T. W. (2004). The power in your hand: Gender differences in bodily feedback from making a fist. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 757-769.

Scott I. M., Clark A. P., Josephson S. C., Boyette A. H., Cuthill I. C., Fried R. L., . . . Penton-Voak I. S. (2014). Human preferences for sexually dimorphic faces may be evolutionarily novel. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 14388-14393.

Sell A., Cosmides L., Tooby J., Sznycer D., Von Rueden C., Gurven M. (2009). Human adaptations for the visual assessment of strength and fighting ability from the body and face. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 276, 575-584.

Sell A., Tooby J., Cosmides L. (2009). Formidability and the logic of human anger. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 15073-15078.

Shrout P., Fleiss J. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420-428.

Simmons J. P., Nelson L. D., Simonsohn U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359-1366.

Smuts B., Cheney D., Seyfarth R., Struhsaker T., Wrangham R. (1987). Primate societies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Sutherland C. A. M., Oldmeadow J. A., Santos I. M., Towler J., Burt D. M., Young A. W. (2013). Social inferences from faces: Ambient images generate a three-dimensional model. Cognition, 127, 105-118.

Tinlin R. M., Watkins C. D., Welling L. L., DeBruine L. M., Al-Dujaili E. A., Jones B. C. (2013). Perceived facial adiposity conveys information about women’s health. British Journal of Psychology, 104, 235-248.

Todorov A., Dotsch R., Porter J. M., Oosterhof N. N., Falvello V. B. (2013). Validation of data-driven computational models of social perception of faces. Emotion, 13, 724-738.

Todorov A., Dotsch R., Wigboldus D., Said C. P. (2011). Data-driven methods for modeling social perception. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 775-791.

Todorov A., Olivola C. Y., Dotsch R., Mende-Siedlecki P. (2015). Social attributions from faces: Determinants, consequences, accuracy, and functional significance. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 519-545.

Todorov A., Oosterhof N. N. (2011, March). Modeling social perception of faces. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 28, 117-122.

Todorov A., Pakrashi M., Oosterhof N. N. (2009). Evaluating faces on trustworthiness after minimal time exposure. Social Cognition, 27, 813-833.

Todorov A., Said C. P., Oosterhof N. N. (2008). Understanding evaluation of faces on social dimensions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 455-460.

Toscano H., Schubert T. W., Sell A. N. (2014). Judgments of dominance from the face track physical strength. Evolutionary Psychology, 12, 1-18.

Valentine T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43, A, 161-204.

Van Vugt M., De Cremer D., Janssen D. P. (2007). Gender differences in cooperation and competition: The male-warrior hypothesis. Psychological Science, 18, 19-23.

Von Rueden C., Gurven M., Kaplan H. (2008). The multiple dimensions of male social status in an Amazonian society. Evolution & Human Behavior, 29, 402-415.

Von Rueden C., Gurven M., Kaplan H. (2011). Why do men seek status? Fitness payoffs to dominance and prestige. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278, 2223-2232.

Walker M., Jiang F., Vetter T., Sczesny S. (2011). Universals and cultural differences in forming personality trait judgments from faces. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 2, 609-617.

Walker M., Vetter T. (2009). Portraits made to measure: Manipulating social judgments about individuals with a statistical face model. Journal of Vision, 9, 1-13.

Watkins C. D., Fraccaro P. J., Smith F. G., Vukovic J., Feinberg D. R., DeBruine L. M., Jones B. C. (2010). Taller men are less sensitive to cues of dominance in other men. Behavioral Ecology, 21, 943-947.

Watkins C. D., Jones B. C., DeBruine L. M. (2010). Individual differences in dominance perception: Dominant men are less sensitive to facial cues of male dominance. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 967-971.

Willis J., Todorov A. (2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17, 592-598.

Wind A. E., Takken T., Helders P. J., Engelbert R. H. (2010). Is grip strength a predictor for total muscle strength in healthy children, adolescents, and young adults? European Journal of Pediatrics, 30, 477-488.

Windhager S., Schaefer K., Fink B. (2011). Geometric morphometrics of male facial shape in relation to physical strength and perceived attractiveness, dominance, and masculinity. American Journal of Human Biology, 23, 805-814.

Zebrowitz L. A., McDonald S. M. (1991). The impact of litigants’ baby-facedness and attractiveness on adjudications in small claims courts. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 603-623.

|

You currently have no access to this content. Visit the access options page to authenticate.