Restricted access

Research article

First published online May 17, 2019

Request permissions

The Prosody of Wh-exclamatives and Wh-questions in German: Speech Act Differences, Information Structure, and Sex of Speaker

Sophie Repp https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1575-4553 [email protected]View all authors and affiliations

Volume 63, Issue 2

https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830919846147

Abstract
References
Supplementary Material

Abstract

The prosody of non-assertive speech acts other than questions is rather underexplored. Very little is known about the role of information structure in non-assertive speech acts in general. The present study presents two production experiments examining the prosody of string-identical verb-second (experiment 1) and verb-final (experiment 2) wh-exclamatives and wh-questions in German in relation to their status as different speech acts, in relation to their sensitivity to information structure, and in relation to speaker sex. The study shows that the two speech acts are differentiated by many prosodic means, both globally (duration, intonation contour) and locally (accent distribution in the clause-initial and clause-final regions; pitch, duration, intensity on various elements in the clause, especially the subject pronoun and the direct object, which are more prominent in exclamatives, and the verb-second auxiliary, which is more prominent in questions). Exclamatives overall show a very rigid prosodic contour; they typically are realized with an accent on the subject pronoun and on the object and end in a fall. Questions are much more flexible; they are realized as rises or falls, and show a more varied accent structure in the clause-initial and clause-final regions. Both speech acts show information-structural effects of givenness marking, but the effects in exclamatives are remarkably weak. It is proposed that the speech-act marking prosody overrides information-structural effects to some extent. Male and female speakers show differences in their preferred accent patterns for the two speech acts. Some acoustic differences are only reliable for female speakers.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Abels K. (2004). Why surprise-predicates do not embed polar interrogatives. Linguistische Arbeitsberichte, 81, 203–221.

Abels K. (2005). Remarks on Grimshaw’s clausal typology. In Maier E., Bary C., Huitink J. (Eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, 9 (pp. 1–15). Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Nijmegen Centre of Semantics.

Altmann H. (1993). Satzmodus. In Jacobs J., Stechow W. A.(Eds.), Syntax: Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung (pp. 1006–1029). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.

Bachorowski J.-A., Owren M. J. (1995). Vocal expression of emotion: Acoustic properties of speech are associated with emotional intensity and context. Psychological Science, 6, 219–224.

Bachorowski J.-A., Owren M. J. (2008). Vocal expressions of emotion. In Lewis M., Haviland-Jones J. M., Feldman Barrett L. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions: Third edition (pp. 196–210). New York, NY: The Guildford Press.

Banse R., Scherer K. R. (1996). Acoustic profiles in vocal emotion expressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 614–636.

Bänziger T., Scherer K. R. (2005). The role of intonation in emotional expressions. Speech Commununication, 46, 252–267.

Bates D., Bolker B., Maechler M., Walker S. (2013). Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4, R Package lme4. Version 1.1–11. [Computer Program]. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org

Batliner A. (1988a). Der Exklamativ: Mehr als Aussage oder doch nur mehr oder weniger Aussage? Experimente zur Rolle von Höhe und Position des F0-Gipfels. In Altmann H. (Ed.), Intonationsforschungen (pp. 243–271). Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.

Batliner A. (1988b). Produktion und Prädikation. Die Rolle intonatorischer und anderer Merkmale bei der Bestimmung des Satzmodus. In Altmann H. (Ed.), Intonationsforschungen (pp. 207–221). Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.

Batliner A. (1988c). Modus und Fokus als Dimensionen einer nonmetrischen multidimensionalen Skalierung. In Altmann H. (Ed.), Intonationsforschungen (pp. 223–242). Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.

Batliner A. (1989). Fokus, Modus, und die große Zahl. Zur intonatorischen Induzierung des Fokus im Deutschen. In Altmann H., Batliner A., Oppenrieder W. (Eds.), Zur Intonation von Modus und Fokus im Deutschen (pp. 21–70). Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.

Baumann S. (2006). The intonation of givenness: Evidence from German. Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.

Baumann S, Grice M., Steindamm S. (2006). Prosodic marking of focus domains: Categorical or gradient? In Hoffmann R., Mixdorff H. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Speech Prosody, Dresden (pp. 301–304). ISCA Archive. Retrieved from http://www.isca-speech.org/archive/sp2006

Baumann S., Riester A. (2012) Referential and lexical givenness: Semantic, prosodic and cognitive aspects. In Elordieta G., Prieto P. (Eds.), Prosody and meaning (pp. 119–162). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.

Baumann S., Riester A. (2013). Coreference, lexical givenness and prosody in German. Lingua, 136, 16–37.

Baumann S., Röhr C. T., Grice M. (2015). Prosodische (De-)Kodierung des Informationsstatus im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 34, 1–42.

Brinckmann A., Benzmüller R. (1999). The relationship between utterance type and F0 contour in German. Proceedings of the Sixth European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (EUROSPEECH’99), Budapest, Hungary, 5–9 September 1999, ISCA Archive. Retrieved from http://www.isca-speech.org/archive/eurospeech_1999.

Beck S. (2006). Intervention effects follow from focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics, 14, 1–56.

Bierwisch M. (1966). Regeln für die Intonation deutscher Sätze. In Bierwisch M. (Ed.), Untersuchungen über Akzent und Intonation im Deutschen (pp. 99–201). Berlin, Germany: Akademieverlag.

Boersma P., Weenink D. (2014). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. [Computer program]. Retrieved from http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/

Breen M., Fedorenko E., Wagner M., Gibson E. (2010). Acoustic correlates of information structure. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 1044–1098.

Castroviejo Miró E. (2006). Wh-Exclamatives in Catalan. Doctoral dissertation. University of Barcelona, Spain.

Chen A. (2012). Shaping the intonation of wh-questions: Information structure and beyond. In De Ruiter P. (Ed.), Questions: Formal, functional and interactional perspectives (pp. 146–162). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

D’Avis F.-J. (2001). Über “w-Exklamativsätze” im Deutschen. Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.

D’Avis F.-J. (2002). On the interpretation of wh-clauses in exclamative environments. Theoretical Linguistics, 28, 5–31.

D’Avis F.-J. (2012). On the placement of the main accent in exclamatives. Talk presented at Information Structure in Non-Assertive Speech Acts. Workshop at the 34th Annual Meeting of the German Linguistic Society (DGfS), Frankfurt.

Delfitto D., Fiorin G. (2014). Exclamatives: Issues of syntax logical form and interpretation. Lingua, 152, 1–20.

Driemel I. (2015). Exclamatives and factivity: A new test based on Verum Focus. In Bellamy K., Karvovskaya E., Kohlberger M., Saad G. (Eds.), Proceedings of ConSOLE XXIII (pp. 406–442). Leiden, The Netherlands: Leiden University Center of Linguistics.

Elliott D. E. (1974). Toward a grammar of exclamatives. Foundations of Language, 11, 231–246.

Féry C. (1993). German intonational patterns. Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.

Féry C., Kügler F. (2008). Pitch accent scaling on given, new and focused constituents in German. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 680–703.

Grammis. Akzent. Retrieved from https://grammis.ids-mannheim.de/systematische-grammatik/2342

Grimshaw J. (1979). Complement selection and the lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry, 10, 279–326.

Gussenhoven C. (2004). The phonology of tone and intonation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Haan J. (2002). Speaking of questions. An exploration of Dutch question intonation. Utrecht, The Netherlands: LOT Publications.

Haida A. (2007). The Indefiniteness and Focusing of Wh-Words. Doctoral dissertation. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany.

Hedberg N., Sosa J. M. (2002). The prosody of questions in natural discourse. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Speech Prosody Aix-en-Provence, France (pp. 375–378). ISCA Archive. Retrieved from http://www.isca-speech.org/archive/sp2002

Hedberg N., Sosa J. M., Fadden L. (2004). Meanings and configurations of questions in English. In Bel B., Marlien I. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Speech Prosody Nara, Japan (pp. 309–312). ISCA Archive. Retrieved from http://www.isca-speech.org/archive/sp2004

Henton C. (1989). Fact and fiction in the description of female and male pitch. Language and Communication, 9, 299–311.

Hermes D. J., Van Gestel J. C. (1991). The frequency scale of speech intonation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90, 97–102.

Isačenko A. V., Schädlich H. J. (1966). Untersuchungen über die deutsche Satzintonation. In Bierwisch M. (Ed.), Untersuchungen über Akzent und Intonation im Deutschen (pp. 7–67). Berlin, Germany: Akademieverlag.

Jacobs J. (1988). Fokus-Hintergrund-Gliederung und Grammatik. In Altmann H. (Ed.), Intonationsforschungen (pp. 89–134). Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.

Jacobs J. (1991). Implikaturen und “alte Information” in w-Fragen. In Reis M., Rosengren I. (Eds.), Fragesätze und Fragen (pp. 201–222). Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.

Kohler K. J. (2004). Pragmatic and attitudinal meanings of pitch patterns in German syntactically marked questions. In Fant G., Fujisaki H., Cao J., Xu Y. (Eds.), From traditional phonology to modern speech processing—In honour of Professor Wu Zongji’s 95th birthday (pp. 205–215). Beijing, China: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

Krifka M. (2008). Basic notions of information structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 55, 243–276.

Kügler F. (2003). Do we know the answer? Variation in yes-no-question intonation. In Fischer S., Van de Vijver R., Vogel R. (Eds.), Experimental studies in linguistics 1 (pp. 9–29). Potsdam, Germany: Potsdam University Press.

Kügler F., Genzel S. (2012). On the prosodic expression of pragmatic prominence: The case of pitch register lowering in Akan, Language and Speech, 55, 331–359.

Kügler F., Smolibocki B., Arnold D., Braun B., Baumann S., Grice M., Jannedy S., Michalsky J., Niebuhr O., Peters J., Ritter S. B., Röhr C. T., Schweitzer A., Schweitzer K., Wagner P. (2015) DIMA—Annotation guidelines for German intonation. Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (paper no. 317). Glasgow, UK: University of Glasgow.

Ladd D. R., Silverman K., Tolkmitt F., Bergmann G., Scherer K. (1985). Evidence for the independent function of intonation contour type, voice quality, and F0 range in signaling speaker affect. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 78, 435–444.

Lieberman P., Michaels S. (1962). Some aspects of fundamental frequency and envelope amplitude as related to the emotional content of speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 34, 922–927.

Michalsky J. (2017). Frageintonation im Deutschen: Zur intonatorischen Markierung von Interrogativität und Fragehaltigkeit. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.

Näf A. (1996). Die w-Exklamativsätze im Deutschen—zugleich ein Plädoyer für eine Rehabilitierung der Empirie in der Sprachwissenschaft. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik, 24(2), 135–152.

Niebuhr O. (2012). Das ist (k)eine Frage—Phonetische Merkmale in der Identifikation standarddeutscher Deklarativfragen. In Anderwald I. L. (Ed.), Sprachmythen—Fiktion oder Wirklichkeit (pp. 203–222). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.

Niebuhr O., Bergherr J., Huth S., Lill C., Neuschulz J. (2010). Intonationsfragen hinterfragt: Die Vielschichtigkeit der prosodischen Unterschiede zwischen Aussage- und Fragesätzen mit deklarativer Syntax. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik, 77, 304–46.

Oppenrieder W. (1988). Intonatorische Kennzeichnung van Satzmodi. In Altmann H. (Ed.), Intonationsforschungen (pp. 69–205). Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.

Peters J. (2005). Intonation. In Duden: Die Grammatik (pp. 95–128). Mannheim, Germany: Dudenverlag.

Petrone C., Niebuhr O. (2014). On the intonation of German intonation questions: The role of the prenuclear region. Language and Speech, 57(1) 108–146.

Pinheiro J., Bates D., DebRoy S., Sarkar D. (2013). Package “nlme” version 3.1–108. [Computer program]. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org

Repp S. (2015). On the acoustics of wh-exclamatives and wh-interrogatives: Effects of information structure and sex of speaker. In The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (Ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (paper no. 319, pp. 1–5). Glasgow, UK: University of Glasgow.

Repp S. (2016a). Semantic restrictions in verb-second versus non-verb-second wh-exclamatives. Talk presented at workshop, ‘Verb second in grammar and processing: Its causes and its consequences’ at the 38th Annual Conference of the Deutschen Gesellschaft für Sprachwissenschaft (DGfS), Konstanz, Germany.

Repp S. (2016b). Contrast: Dissecting an elusive information-structural notion and its role in grammar. In Féry C., Ishihara S. (Eds.), OUP handbook of information structure. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Repp S., Rosin S. (2015). The intonation of echo wh-questions. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH 2015), Dresden, Germany, 6–10 September 2015 (pp. 938–942). International Speech Communication Association. ISSN: 1990-9770, ISCA Archive. Retrieved from http://www.isca-speech.org/archive/interspeech_2015

Rett J. (2008). Degree Modification in Natural Language. Doctoral dissertation, State University of New Jersey, USA.

Rett J. (2011). Exclamatives, degrees and speech acts. Linguistics and Philosophy, 34, 411–442.

Roguska M. (2007). Exklamation und Negation. Doctoral dissertation, Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz, Germany.

Rohloff M., Michalsky J. (2018). Pitch scaling as a question cue in German wh-questions. In Proceedings of Phonetics & Phonology in German-Speaking Countries (P&P 13, pp. 169–172). Berlin, Germany: Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.

Röhr C., Baumann S. (2010). Prosodic marking of information status in German. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Speech Prosody Chicago (paper no. 19). ISCA Archive. Retrieved from http://www.isca-speech.org/sp2010/ITRW

Rooth M. (1985). Association with Focus. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, USA.

Rooth M. (1992). A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics, 1, 75–116.

Rosengren I. (1992). Zur Grammatik und Pragmatik der Exklamation. In Rosengren I. (Ed.), Satz und Illokution: Volume 1 (pp. 263–306). Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.

Rosengren I. (1997). Expressive sentence types—a contradiction in terms: The case of exclamation. In Swan T., Westvik O. J. (Eds.), Modality in Germanic languages: Historical and comparative perspectives (pp. 151–184). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Scherer K. R., Banse R., Wallbott H. G., Goldbeck T. (1991). Vocal cues in emotion encoding and decoding. Motivation and Emotion, 15, 123–148.

Schmid C., Moosmüller C. (2013). Gender differences in the phonetic realization of semantic focus. In Mertens P., Simon A. C. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Prosody-Discourse Interface Conference 2013 (IDP-2013), Leuven, September 11–13 (pp. 13–19). Retrieved from http://www.arts.kuleuven.be/ling/franitalco/idp2013/proceedings.html

Schneider K., Lintfert B. (2003). Categorical perception of boundary tones in German. In Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS-15), Barcelona (pp. 631–634). ICPhS Archive. Retrieved from http://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs/icphs2003.

Scholz U. (1991). Wunschsätze im Deutschen—formale und funktionale Beschreibung. Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.

Selting M. (1995). Prosodie im Gespräch: Aspekte einer interaktionalen Phonologie der Konversation. Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.

Truckenbrodt H. (2012). On the prosody of German wh-questions. In Elordieta G., Prieto P. (Eds.), Prosody and Meaning (pp. 73–118). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.

Uhmann S. (1991). Fokusphonologie: Eine Analyse deutscher Intonationskonturen im Rahmen der nicht-linearen Phonologie. Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.

van Heuven V. J., Haan J. (2000). J. Phonetic correlates of statement versus question intonation in Dutch. In Botinis A. (Ed.), Intonation. analysis, modelling and technology (pp. 119–144). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

van Heuven V., van Zanten E. (2005). Speech rate as a secondary prosodic characteristic of polarity questions in three languages. Speech Communication, 47, 87–99.

von Essen O. (1964). Grundzüge der hochdeutschen Satzintonation. Ratingen, Germany: A. Henn Verlag.

Wochner D., Schlegel J., Dehé N., Braun B. (2015). The prosodic marking of rhetorical questions in German. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH 2015) (pp. 938–942). International Speech Communication Association.

Xu Y. (2013). ProsodyPro—A tool for large-scale systematic prosody analysis. In Bigi B., Hirst D. (Eds.), Proceedings of Tools and Resources for the Analysis of Speech Prosody (TRASP), Aix-en-Provence (pp. 7–10). Aix-en-Provence, France: Laboratoire Parole et Langage (LPL). Retrieved from http://www.lpl-aix.fr/~trasp/Proceedings/TRASP2013_proceedings.pdf

Zanuttini R., Portner P. (2003). Exclamative clauses: At the syntax-semantic interface. Language, 79, 39–81.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

supplementary_materials.docx
32.34 KB

|

You currently have no access to this content. Visit the access options page to authenticate.