Restricted access

Research article

First published online December 19, 2011

Request permissions

First Impressions From Faces Among U.S. and Culturally Isolated Tsimane’ People in the Bolivian Rainforest

Leslie A. Zebrowitz, Ruoxue Wang, […], P. Matthew Bronstad, Dan Eisenberg, Eduardo Undurraga, Victoria Reyes-García, and Ricardo Godoy+4View all authors and affiliations

Volume 43, Issue 1

https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022111411386

Abstract
References

Abstract

The authors examined the generalizability of first impressions from faces previously documented in industrialized cultures to the Tsimane’ people in the remote Bolivian rainforest. Tsimane’ as well as U.S. judges showed within-culture agreement in impressions of attractiveness, babyfaceness, and traits (healthy, intelligent/knowledgeable, dominant/respected, and sociable/warm) of own-culture faces. Both groups also showed within-culture agreement for impressions of other-culture faces, although it was weaker than for own-culture faces, particularly among Tsimane’ judges. Moreover, there was between-culture agreement, particularly for Tsimane’ faces. Use of facial attractiveness to judge traits contributed to agreement within and between cultures but did not fully explain it. Furthermore, Tsimane’, like U.S., judges showed a strong attractiveness halo in impressions of faces from both cultures as well as the babyface stereotype, albeit more weakly. In addition to cross-cultural similarities in trait impressions from faces, supporting a universal mechanism, some effects were moderated by perceiver and face culture, consistent with perceiver attunements conditioned by culturally specific perceptual learning.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Albright L., Malloy T. E., Dong Q., Kenny D. A., Fang X. (1997). Cross-cultural consensus in personality judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(3), 558-569.

Anderson S. L., Adams G., Plaut V. C. (2008). The cultural grounding of personal relationship: The importance of attractiveness in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 352-368.

Bar M., Neta M., Linz H. (2006). Very first impressions. Emotion, 6(2), 269-278.

Biernat M., Manis M., Stapel D. A., Suls J. (2007). Stereotypes and shifting standards: Assimilation and contrast in social judgment. In Stapel D. A., Sulus J. (Eds.), Assimilation and contrast in social psychology (pp. 75-97). New York: Psychology Press.

Bronstad P. M., Langlois J. H., Russell R. (2008). Computational models of facial attractiveness judgments. Perception, 37(1), 126-142.

Bronstad P. M., Russell R. (2007). Beauty is in the ‘we’ of the beholder: Greater agreement on facial attractiveness among close relations. Perception, 36(11), 1674-1681.

Buss D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 12, 1-49.

Darwin C. (1887). The autobiography of Charles Darwin: 1809-1882 (Project Gutenberg, EBook #2010). Available at http://www.gutenberg.org

Dion K. K. (2002). Cultural perspectives on facial attractiveness. In Rhodes G., Zebrowitz L. A. (Eds.), Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary, cognitive, and social perspectives (pp. 239-260). Westport, CT: Ablex.

Dion K. K., Pak A. W., Dion K. L. (1990). Stereotyping physical attractiveness: A sociocultural perspective. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 21, 378-398.

Eichorn D. H. (1981). Samples and procedures. In Eichorn D. H., Clausen J. A., Haan N., Honzik M. P., Mussen P. H. (Eds.), Present and past in middle life (pp. 33-51). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Ekman P., Friesen W. V. (1971). Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17(2), 124-129.

Furl N., Phillips P. J., O’Toole A. J. (2002). Face recognition algorithms and the other-race effect: Computational mechanisms for a developmental contact hypothesis. Cognitive Science, 26(6), 797-815.

Gangestad S. W., Buss D. M. (1993). Pathogen prevalence and human mate preferences. Ethnology and Sociobiology, 14, 89-96.

Gibson J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Oxford, UK: Houghton Mifflin.

Jones D., Hill K. (1993). Criteria of facial attractiveness in five populations. Human Nature, 4, 271-296.

Kramer S., Zebrowitz L. A., San Giovanni J. P., Sherak B. (1995). Infants’ preferences for attractiveness and babyfaceness. In Bardy R. J. B. B. G., Guiard Y. (Eds.), Studies in perception and action III (pp. 389-392). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Langlois J. H., Ritter J. M., Roggman L. A., Vaughn L. S. (1991). Facial diversity and infant preferences for attractive faces. Developmental Psychology, 27(1), 79-84.

Langlois J. H., Roggman L. A. (1990). Attractive faces are only average. Psychological Science, 1(2), 115-121.

Langlois J. H., Roggman L. A., Casey R. J., Ritter J. M. (1987). Infant preferences for attractive faces: Rudiments of a stereotype? Developmental Psychology, 23(3), 363-369.

Luevano V. X., Zebrowitz L. A. (2007). Do impressions of health, dominance, and warmth explain why masculine faces are preferred more in a short-term mate? Evolutionary Psychology, 5, 15-27.

McArthur L. Z., Baron R. M. (1983). Toward an ecological theory of social perception. Psychological Review, 90, 215-238.

McArthur L. Z., Berry D. S. (1987). Cross-cultural agreement in perceptions of babyfaced adults. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18, 165-192.

Montepare J. M., Zebrowitz L. A. (1998). Person perception comes of age: The salience and significance of age in social judgments. In Zanna M. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 93-163). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Park J. H., Schaller M. (2009). Parasites, minds and cultures. The Psychologist, 22(11), 942-945.

Reyes-García V., Byron E., Vadez V., Godoy R., Apaza L., Pérez E., Leonard W., Wilkie D. (2004). Measuring culture as shared knowledge: Do test types matter? Data from Tsimane’ Amerindians, Bolivia. Field Methods, 16(2), 135-156.

Reyes-García V., Godoy R., Vadez V., Ruiz-Mallen I., Huanca T., Leonard W., McDade T., Tanner S., & TAPS Bolivia Study Team. (2009). The pay-offs to sociability: Do solitary and social leisure relate to happiness? Human Nature, 20, 431-446.

Reyes-García V., Kightley E., Ruiz-Mallen I., Fuentes-Peláez N., Demps K., Huanca T., Martinez-Rodrıguez M. R. (2010). Schooling and local environmental knowledge: Do they complement or substitute each other? International Journal of Educational Development, 30, 305-313.

Rhodes G. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. In Fiske S. T., Kazdin A. E., Schacter D. L. (Eds.), Annual review of psychology (Vol. 57, pp. 199-226.). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.

Rule N. O., Ambady N. (2008). Brief exposures: Male sexual orientation is accurately perceived at 50ms. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(4), 1100-1105.

Rule N. O., Ambady N., Adams R. B. Jr., Ozono H., Nakashima S., Yoshikawa S., et al. (2010). Polling the face: Prediction and consensus across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(1), 1-15.

Sangrigoli S., Pallier C., Argenti A. M., Ventureyra V. A. G., de Schonen S. (2005). Reversibility of the Other-race effect in face recognition during childhood. Psychological Science, 16(6), 440-444.

Shaffer D. R., Crepaz N., Sun C. R. (2000). Physical attractiveness stereotyping in cross-cultural perspective—Similarities and differences between Americans and Taiwanese. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31(5), 557-582.

Undurraga E. A., Eisenberg D. T. A., Magvanjav O., Wang R., Leonard W. R., McDade T. W., Reyes-García V., Nyberg C., Tanner S., Huanca T., Godoy R. A., & TAPS Bolivia Study Team. (2010). Human’s cognitive ability to assess facial cues from photographs: A study of sexual selection in the Bolivian Amazon. PLoS ONE, 5(6), e11027.

Wheeler L., Kim Y. (1997). What is beautiful is culturally good: The physical attractiveness stereotype has different content in collectivistic cultures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 795-800.

Willis J., Todorov A. (2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17(7), 592-598.

Zebrowitz L. A., Bronstad M. P., Montepare J. M. (2011). An ecological theory of face perception. In Ambady N., Adams R., Nakayama K., Shimojo S. (Eds.), The science of social vision (pp. 3-30). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Zebrowitz L. A., Fellous J. M., Mignault A., Andreoletti C. (2003). Trait impressions as overgeneralized responses to adaptively significant facial qualities: Evidence from connectionist modeling. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 194-215.

Zebrowitz L. A., Kikuchi M., Fellous J. M. (2010). Facial resemblance to emotions: Group differences, impression effects, and race stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 175-189.

Zebrowitz L. A., Montepare J. M. (1992). Impressions of babyfaced males and females across the lifespan. Developmental Psychology, 28, 1143-1152.

Zebrowitz L. A., Montepare J. M. (2006). The ecological approach to person perception: Evolutionary roots and contemporary offshoots. In Schaller M., Simpson J. A., Kenrick D. T. (Eds.), Evolution and social psychology (pp. 81-113). New York: Psychology Press.

Zebrowitz L. A., Montepare J. M. (2008). Social psychological face perception: Why appearance matters. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1497-1517.

Zebrowitz L. A., Montepare J. M., Lee H. K. (1993). They don’t all look alike: Differentiating same versus other race individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 85-101.

Zebrowitz L. A., Olson K., Hoffman K. (1993). Stability of babyfaceness and attractiveness across the lifespan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 453-466.

Zebrowitz L. A., Rhodes G. (2004). Sensitivity to ‘bad genes’ and the anomalous face overgeneralization effect: Accuracy, cue validity, and cue utilization in judging intelligence and health. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 28, 167-185.

|

You currently have no access to this content. Visit the access options page to authenticate.