Restricted access

Research article

First published online September 4, 2012

Request permissions

Explaining Left–Right Party Congruence Across European Party Systems: A Test of Micro-, Meso-, and Macro-Level Models

Ana Maria BelchiorView all authors and affiliations

Volume 46, Issue 3

https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414012453695

Abstract
References
Biographies

Abstract

Empirical studies on representation have been based mainly on the descriptive analysis of levels of political or ideological congruence between MPs and voters. Very few studies focus on explaining congruence, and those that have done so do not explore all the explanatory dimensions. This article contributes to filling this gap by testing whether three theoretical models can explain left–right congruence among European parties. These models explore causality at the micro or individual level (the characteristics of voters and MPs), the meso level (party characteristics), and the macro or system level (party system and institutional characteristics). Based on data from the PIREDEU project, the study examines the party systems of the 27 countries of the European Union with reference to the 2009 European Parliament elections. The findings reveal that MP–voter congruence is best explained at the party level and by key MP candidate characteristics.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Ansolabehere S., Jones P. E. (2010). Constituents’ responses to congressional roll-call voting. American Journal of Political Science, 54, 583-597.

Barnes S. (1977). Representation in Italy: Institutionalised tradition and electoral choice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Belchior A. M. (2008). Party political representation in Portugal. South European Society and Politics, 13, 457-476.

Belchior A. M. (2010). Ideological congruence among European political parties. Journal of Legislative Studies, 12, 121-142.

Benoit K., Laver M. (2006). Party policy in modern democracies. New York, NY: Routledge.

Braun D., Mikhaylov S., Schmitt H. (2010, July 22). EES (2009) Manifesto study documentation advance release (User beware/pre-release B). Retrieved from www.piredeu.eu

Converse P., Pierce R. (1986). Political representation in France. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.

Czesnik M., Kotnarowski M., Markowski R. (2010, May 16). EES (2009) Contextual dataset codebook, advance release. Retrieved from www.piredeu.eu

Dalton R. J. (1985). Political parties and political representation: Party supporters and party elites in nine nations. Comparative Political Studies, 18, 267-299.

Downs A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York, NY: HarperCollins.

Dye T. R., Zeigler H. (2006). The irony of democracy (13th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.

Enelow J. M., Hinich M. J. (1984). The spatial theory of voting: An introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Erzow L. (2007). The Variance Matters: How Party Systems Represent the Preferences of Voters. The Journal of Politics, 69(1), 182-192.

Esaiasson P., Holmberg S. (1996). Representation from above: Members of parliament and representative democracy in Sweden. Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth.

Eulau H. (1987). The congruence model revisited. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 7, 171-214.

European Election Studies. (2009a, April 7). European Parliament Election Study 2009, voter study, advance release. Retrieved from www.piredeu.eu

European Election Studies. (2009b, July). European Parliament Election Study 2009, candidate study, advance release. Retrieved from www.piredeu.eu

European Election Studies. (2009c, July 22). European Parliament Election Study 2009, manifesto study data, advance release (user beware/pre-release B). Retrieved from www.piredeu.eu

European Election Studies. (2009d, May 16). European Parliament Election Study 2009, contextual data, advance release. Retrieved from www.piredeu.eu

Freire A., Belchior A. M. (in press). Ideological representation in Portugal: MPs–electors linkages in terms of left–right placement and substantive meaning. European Political Science Review.

Gallagher M. (1991). Proportionality, disproportionality and electoral systems. Electoral Studies, 10, 33-51.

Held D. (1996). Models of democracy. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

Hill K. Q., Anderson A. H. (1995). Pathways of representation: A causal analysis of public opinion-policy linkages. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 924-935.

Holmberg S. (1989). Political representation in Sweden. Scandinavian Political Studies, 12, 1-36.

Holmberg S. (1999). Collective policy congruence compared. In Miller W., Pierce R., Thomassen J., Herrera R., Holmberg S., Esaiasson P., Wessels B. (Eds.), Policy representation in Western democracies (pp. 87-109). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Holmberg S. (2000). Issue agreement. In Esaiasson P., Heider K. (Eds.), Beyond Westminster and Congress: The Nordic experience (pp. 155-180). Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

Huber J., Powell G. B. Jr. (1994). Congruence between citizens and policy makers in two visions of liberal democracy. World Politics, 46, 291-326.

Hurley P., Hill K. Q. (2003). Beyond the demand-input model: a theory of representational linkages. The Journal of Politics, 65(2), 304-326.

Iversen T. (1994a). The logics of electoral politics: Spatial, directional, and mobilizational effects. Comparative Political Studies, 27, 155-189.

Iversen T. (1994b). Political leadership and representation in West European democracies: A test of three models of voting. American Journal of Political Science, 38, 45-74.

Klingemann H.-D. (1995). Party positions and voter orientations. In Klingemann H.-D., Fuchs D. (Eds.), Citizens and the state (pp. 183-205). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Laakso M., Taagepera R. (1979). Effective number of parties: A measure with application to West Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 12, 3-27.

Mattila M., Raunio T. (2006). Cautious voters—supportive parties: Opinion congruence between voters and parties on the EU dimension. European Union Politics, 7, 427-449.

May J. D. (1973). Opinion structure of political parties: The special law of curvilinear disparity. Political Studies, 21, 135-151.

McDonald M., Budge I. (2005). Election, parties, democracy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Miller W., Pierce R., Thomassen J., Herrera R., Holmberg S., Esaiasson P., Wessels B. (1999). Policy representation in Western democracies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Miller W., Stokes D. (1963). Constituency influence in Congress. American Political Science Review, 57, 45-56.

Pierce R. (1999). Mass-elite issue linkages and the responsible party model representation. In Miller W., Pierce R., Thomassen J., Herrera R., Holmberg S., Esaiasson P., Wessels B. (Eds.), Policy representation in Western democracies (pp. 9-32). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Pitkin H. F. (1967). The concept of representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Powell G. B. Jr. (2000). Elections as instruments of democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Powell G. B. Jr. (2004). Political representation in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 7, 273-296.

Przeworski A., Sprague J. (1986). Paper stones: A history of electoral socialism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Rabinowitz G., MacDonald S. E., Listhaug O. (1991). New players in an old game: Party strategy in multiparty systems. Comparative Political Studies, 24, 147-185.

Rabinowitz G., MacDonald S. E., Listhaug O. (2003, August). Issue voting in a responsible party system. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, PA. Retrieved from http://www.allacademic.com//meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/0/6/3/7/8/pages63784/p63784-1.php

Rae D. (1967). The political consequences of electoral laws. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Schmitt H., Thomassen J. (Eds.). (1999). Political representation and legitimacy in the European Union. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Thomassen J. (1994). Empirical research into political representation: Failing democracy or failing models? In Kent Jennings M., Mann T. E. (Eds.), Elections at home and abroad (pp. 237-264). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Thomassen J. (1999). Political communication between political elites and mass publics: The role of belief systems. In Miller W., Pierce R., Thomassen J., Herrera R., Holmberg S., Esaiasson P., Wessels B. (Eds.), Policy representation in Western democracies (pp. 33-58). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Thomassen J., Andeweg R. B. (2004). Beyond collective representation: Individual members of parliament and interest representation in the Netherlands. Journal of Legislative Studies, 10, 47-69.

Thomassen J., Schmitt H. (1999a). Introduction: Political representation and legitimacy in the European Union. In Schmitt H., Thomassen J. (Eds.), Political representation and legitimacy in the European Union (pp. 3-21). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Thomassen J., Schmitt H. (1999b). Issue congruence. In Schmitt H., Thomassen J. (Eds.), Political representation and legitimacy in the European Union (pp. 186-208). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Valen H., Narud H. (2007). The conditional party mandate: A model for the study of mass and elite opinion patterns. European Journal of Political Research, 46, 293-318.

Wessels B. (1999). System characteristics matter: Empirical evidence from ten representation studies. In Miller W., Pierce R., Thomassen J., Herrera R., Holmberg S., Esaiasson P., Wessels B. (Eds.), Policy representation in Western democracies (pp. 137-161). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Wlezien C., Soroka S. (2007). The relationship between public opinion and policy. In Dalton R., Klingemann H.-D. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political behavior (pp. 799-817). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Biographies

Ana Maria Belchior is an assistant professor at ISCTE-IUL (Lisbon University Institute) in Lisbon and senior researcher at CIES-ISCTE-IU. She has been involved in research on several projects related to the themes of democracy and globalization, political participation, democratic representation, and political congruence and has published her findings in diverse national and international journals.

|

You currently have no access to this content. Visit the access options page to authenticate.